I have dealt with that shop and had no issue with them myself. But, I normally keep a tight rein on projects to avoid cost escalation and to nip scheduling problems in the bud. On something like this, the bike itself would never leave my own shop, and anything that involves paying others to do something gets divided up into manageable chunks with a well defined scope of work and cost for each one, "Order this list of parts", or "paint this like this example", or "press out this old bearing and press in this new one". But it's obviously way too late for that now, in this case.
A poorly-defined scope of work and a blank check are not going to get a house built properly ... and they're not going to get a bike built properly, either.
Just like most legal cases ... there are three different stories - the plaintiff's, the defendant's, and the truth. We've only heard one of them. It sure does not sound good ... but there has got to be more to it than this.
It is very, very easy to spend $6500 on just a built engine (nevermind a whole bike), and end up with one that, at least from the outside, looks exactly the same as what you started with.
A poorly-defined scope of work and a blank check are not going to get a house built properly ... and they're not going to get a bike built properly, either.
Just like most legal cases ... there are three different stories - the plaintiff's, the defendant's, and the truth. We've only heard one of them. It sure does not sound good ... but there has got to be more to it than this.
It is very, very easy to spend $6500 on just a built engine (nevermind a whole bike), and end up with one that, at least from the outside, looks exactly the same as what you started with.