I'm not sure if that was intended to be tongue-in-cheek or not. It's a bit of a reach to suggest that infants are responsible for their own safety.
In any case, it doesn't appear that they're even required to enforce laws, like arresting someone for violating a restraining order:
or
In any case, it doesn't appear that they're even required to enforce laws, like arresting someone for violating a restraining order:
In 2005's Castle Rock v. Gonzales, a woman sued the police for failing to protect her from her husband after he violated a restraining order and abducted and killed their three children. Justices said the police had no such duty.
or
Supreme Court precedent in Deshaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services (1989). In that case, a young boy was repeatedly abused at the hands of his father, something that county Social Services was aware of, but made no effort to remove the child. His mother sued once the four-year old entered a vegetative state, and the Court ruled that that the state did not have a special obligation to protect a citizen against harms it did not create