When you're being assaulted by a guy with a gun, a club, and anger management issues you're wise to be the first one to pull your gun, I'd say.
While that makes sense, your argument could be used for many many police interactions and the results would be far different. Unless you have a video of the entire situation (and it is secure or widely distributed), sadly no matter what you do, you lose. Even if you have video, you probably lose.When you're being assaulted by a guy with a gun, a club, and anger management issues you're wise to be the first one to pull your gun, I'd say.
It should never get to the point of what happened between those two officers. The aggressor should have been cashiered from the force long ago, given his track record. It's based on that record that I'm willing to believe the other officer about what happened, even though he is the one who discharged his weapon.While that makes sense, your argument could be used for many many police interactions and the results would be far different. Unless you have a video of the entire situation (and it is secure or widely distributed), sadly no matter what you do, you lose. Even if you have video, you probably lose.
Another cop in Durham just got criminally charged for pointing their gun at somebody without justification. It's somewhat positive that some blue is actually being charged for bad behaviour now but until they start getting sentences the same (or worse) than you or I would get for pointing a gun at somebody, it is the same farce it has always been. Obviously I am not talking about justified events that occur in the the execution of their duties.
I agree. I was just pointing out that even with the appalling record of the cop that got shot, he was still on the force and carrying a gun. If he got in an altercation with you instead of a coworker, it would have been bad for you almost without exception.It should never get to the point of what happened between those two officers. The aggressor should have been cashiered from the force long ago, given his track record. It's based on that record that I'm willing to believe the other officer about what happened, even though he is the one who discharged his weapon.
Given the way that things have been going lately we might finally be seeing the end of the "old boys club" in our lifetimes.
That sucks. It's not an easy situation to deal with when cops are going into a place they know is full of guns. I would be shocked if SIU does anything here (even if this was another needless death caused by piss poor police tactics and training).Interested to find out what happened here...
Man shot in police incident was gunsmith, neighbour says
Special Investigations Unit assigns five inspectors to incidentwww.brantfordexpositor.ca
Rodger was an aquantence of mine and well regarded in the sports shooting community
From what I have read, I am inclined to believe that. Why go in politely when you can unleash testosterone though? None of these investigations ever touch the question of should things have been done differently. SIU just looks at whether officer deserves criminal charges (almost always they decide no). Everything else is dealt with (or ignored) in house as heaven forbid anyone takes responsibility for killing people. Better to go back to work and if it happens again in the future, too bad. (obvious sarcasm dripping through this post).Thing is... Knowing Rodger they could have sent over two plainclothes detectives with a tray of double doubles and just asked to come in and search.
He was a licensed gunsmith/firearms business... Subject to regular inspections anyway
Agreed. No idea if a conviction would come from it but any normal citizen would have been immediately charged. Policy should be either to lay the charge roadside or not but a different policy based on your occupation is untenable.I wish the media would use their power more to put pressure on situations like this to keep something like that front and center until officer is charged like any other member of the public would be.
Oy….that car he hit is going to be charged with impeding traffic or something stupid. /sI think there may have been a post on this before but not sure which thread. Dashcam video has now come out. Police SUV piling into slow moving or stopped cars on QEW. If it's the incident I am remembering, no charges laid at the scene which is a vastly different outcome than a civilian in the same situation.
CAUGHT ON CAMERA: OPP crash on Oakville QEW that injures 4 captured on dashcam video
Investigators expected to provide updatewww.stcatharinesstandard.ca
My favourite is lighting up their flashing lights to not wait at a red light…love it.
400 was putting out pilons to drop to one lane last week. Prior to this, police SUV was driving along at 105 to 110. Traffic slowed as lanes were removed. Cop threw on the cherries, went through the cone line, past the trucks putting out cones then turned them off and continued at 105 to 110.Pushing their luck with that one... Lol
'Buddy of mine took a suspension for just that.
Citizen Karen noted the car's number, time of day, location etc. and filed a complaint.
Investigation led to the the conclusion there was no compelling reason for the constable to have done what he did.
'Buddy didn't bother appealing... Took the suspension and we went fishing.
400 was putting out pilons to drop to one lane last week. Prior to this, police SUV was driving along at 105 to 110. Traffic slowed as lanes were removed. Cop threw on the cherries, went through the cone line, past the trucks putting out cones then turned them off and continued at 105 to 110.
The question is whether the damage to the public trust (us vs them) was worth saving a minute of drive time. I had to to pee too. Obviously they weren't in a tremendous hurry as they didn't drive quickly after, they just didn't want to wait with the rest of us (maybe they had a meeting or something "justified" but I had a meeting to get too as well).I'd probably do the same... We all would.
Especially if I had to pee.
Truth is... When we see these things happen... We have no idea why or the reasoning behind. There's even a chance it's totally legit and justifiable.
In a case in which there are injuries and significant property damage like in this case then you're right, any regular citizen would have been charged. If there are no injuries then it's not hugely uncommon for OPP to just let insurance deal with it.Agreed. No idea if a conviction would come from it but any normal citizen would have been immediately charged. Policy should be either to lay the charge roadside or not but a different policy based on your occupation is untenable.
That’s what ex-cop buddy told me also when I told him how annoying it is. Literally said the same words.Truth is... When we see these things happen... We have no idea why or the reasoning behind. There's even a chance it's totally legit and justifiable.
It must suck to drive a cop car in traffic.That’s what ex-cop buddy told me also when I told him how annoying it is. Literally said the same words.
He’s right. But it’s pretty fishy when the lights go on JUST to get around traffic.