Draco, I'm confused about what went wrong here. You ordered a product and service - lower kit and installation of said kit. They delivered on this.
He asked if the bike they were considering purchasing could be lowered like the one on the show room floor. The sales rep...as in "representative for the Kahuna" said "sure, no problem". By the sales rep acknowledging such, one can and should infer that such a modification can be done safely.
it's not as if he walked in with a pair of lowering links and just insisted that they be installed.
You rode a bike that was set up for your wife and sounds like you were too heavy to be riding it, causing the wheel to hit the undertail. How is Kahuna to blame?
Correction: it was NOT set up for his wife. the sales rep was informed and understood that BOTH he and his wife would be riding it. in any case, it was "not set up" for his wife. all that was done was the installation of a 2" lowering link. suspension settings were not adjusted, available suspension travel was not modified to account for the decreased clearance, and a stiffer spring to accommodate the decreased suspension clearance was not installed, or suggested.
in summary: the bike was NOT lowered in a professional or safe manner. It was a hack job. Ergo, the purchaser's request was NOT honoured. Therefore, Kahuna is responsible for the damage they caused, or known would have been caused.
I can understand if you went in and did some research, asked the service shop if this was a safe option considering you are riding it. But it sounds from your post that Rod knew you would ride the bike and you went ahead and ordered the service. Should he refuse to do it based on the assumption that you did not do your research?
"Research" is not required in this scenario. The sales rep, as a representative of the company from which the bike was purchased and the modification was (poorly) done had said "not a problem" knowing full well that Draco would be riding the bike. the statement "no problem" in and of itself makes Kahuna liable for any negative consequence of their negligent actions. Even if rob the sales rep did not know what he was talking about, by rob as a representative of kahuna saying "no problem" makes kahuna liable.
if Draco is too heavy, Rob should have taken this into account before he said "no problem". Rob knew Draco would be riding the bike. It doesn't matter if it was going to be just a few times or all the time. The bike was sold with Rob knowing full well that BOTH Draco and his wife would be riding. If lowered PROPERLY and if the new owners were properly warned, it is extremely likely that no damage would have resulted. if the bike was NOT going to lowered properly, then Rob should ABSOLUTELY have refused to do the modification, or at least told Draco that he could not ride the bike without damaging it.
I think what they did was fair. They could have been completely uncooperative and insisted you pay full price for service like everyone else. Instead, it sounds like they were willing to work out a deal with you, seeing that you are upset.
they were ABSOLUTELY NOT fair in the grievance process. they WERE in fact completely unco-operative. When Draco was given a quote of $215 to remedy the situation, Draco, realizing he was pretty much paying for everything, and the shop paying NOTHING, said "not good enough". To this, Kahuna tried to play a shell game, saying that in that case, they wouldn't charge labour to re-raise the bike, but would then instead charge labour to install the new fender. New quote: $215. I'd call that a BS, "F.U." move on the part of Kahuna. Treating the customer as an idiot, and spitting in his face.
You have to remember there is a reason there are different departments for service and sales. Each has an expertise in their own area. Sometimes the lines may be blurred, but this should not be expectation...just a pleasant surprise when it does happen.
just because they are different departments does NOT exempt them from communicating to one another, especially if one department is a five second walk or a phone call away from the other. the staff at kahuna clearly did not do their due diligence in ensuring that the weight of the rider would not adversely affect the safety of the bike for the manner in which they were intending to lower it. Something they should have known, and should have done.
Lesson learned here. Be an informed customer. You don't need to know exactly how to lower a bike but you should do your homework before ordering it up. Same goes for any other product/service.
how can you advise him to be an "informed customer" but then tell him he does not need to know how exactly the bike would be lowered, when the way the bike was lowered was precisely what led to the problem?
Again, Kahuna said it would be no problem. As such, Draco, as a consumer has the right to believe that Kahuna knows what they are talking about at face value. If kahuna was wrong, as they obviously are, because the bike became damaged, they should and are liable.