When it collapses, if it collapses, it pushes on the padding underneath it, and like you said it's no different. I just cant see the harm in having a hard shell on top of a energy absorbing pad as opposed to the same energy absorbing pad by itself.
The amount of broken elbows with hard armour can probably prove that. I think most are getting slightly confused on the word "soft" Soft armour which is engineered is not really that soft If we use Forcefield as an example. The outsde shell or surface is a hard rubber type texture with shapes moulded into it depth wise.
So it is pretty hard and then as you get inside it turns solid and body heat would soften it up.
Hard plastic with out a doubt will transfer any or all energy right through.
As I see more riders that have hit the ground then neary anyone,,,hard armour is painful and not affective. It gives you a mental sense of protection but is very old school in today's sport. Not to mention a lot of it is dumped into the North American market as we have no controlling body protecting riders. So where it might not be marketable in Europe it is here.