cbr600_brandon
Well-known member
oh my ****ing god it is my f4i
how is the 2002 CBR 600 F4I
- Thread starter cbr600_brandon
- Start date
- Status
cbr600_brandon
Well-known member
I know its my bike because the rear tail is faded and it has the stickers on the side and also every thing is the same
cbr600_brandon
Well-known member
I don't thing my last msg went trough yes that is my f4i same faded tail same stickers same every thing even when they pulled up to the guys house at the end same car and every thing LOL
FlightTeam6er
Well-known member
Haha that's awesome! It's a sick bike tho, sounds wicked.
Yes it is amazing that you have found the ONLY way to get cheap insurance. The minute your insurer sees your the rider, the policy will be voided and if you hit and injure someone, you will never again hope to own anything because they $500,000 - $10,000,000 award will be yours to pay off.
Oh and you might want to tell dear old dad that when this happens ALL his insurance will be canceled for committing insurance fraud. He will then need to get a policy from faculty insurer at 3- 500 % of what he currently pays.
Not sure how an 18 year old has "10 years riding experience" unless your talking dirtbikes which mean NOTHING to insurance your still a brand new rider to them, even if you 40 years dirt experience and got your M1
Lastly, you realize that when you apply for insurance when your say 25 you will be rated as a NEW rider because your current fraud won't be taken into consideration.
Nice you publicly admitted that is your bike now a copper watching it can run your plate which is nicely displayed on the video. Don't answer the door anytime soon.
But your smarter then anyone of us or the entire insurance industry so off you go. Keep up that front wheel
Last edited:
FlightTeam6er
Well-known member
Holy relax. He's probably on the insurance as a secondary rider. His Dad is probably primary thus he is insured to ride it and covered if an accident were to happen. Non issue.
An what can a cop do by running a previous owners licence plate that is no longer valid? Ill give you a hint... nothing.
You are trying way to hard.
Apparently your unaware how insurance works a policy premium is based upon the highest risk rider, (given that he was quoted, according to him $8,000+, I highly doubt it dropped to under $1,000 with him as secondary). If he is the primary rider, (which he also admitted to on a public forum), hard to argue when a crash occurs that he was an occasional rider.
As for the plate. When I was a cop, I could run a plate current or not, and that would provide VIN. VIN then reveals entire history including current owner. The insurance industry also has investigators who can determine from this info if fraud is involved. Epic fail on your part feel free to come back when you actually know what your talking about
Point is he IS committing fraud and according to insurers that is why the rest of us pay high premiums.
As for the plate. When I was a cop, I could run a plate current or not, and that would provide VIN. VIN then reveals entire history including current owner. The insurance industry also has investigators who can determine from this info if fraud is involved. Epic fail on your part feel free to come back when you actually know what your talking about
Point is he IS committing fraud and according to insurers that is why the rest of us pay high premiums.
FlightTeam6er
Well-known member
Just stop. You are accomplishing nothing. Whether he is actually the primary rider or not doesn't matter. You claimed he was going to be held liable for 500,000-10,000,000 because he had "no coverage" which is false. The bike is insured and he would be on the policy.
Getting the VIN of a bike that is "legally" on the road and insured will accomplish nothing. He is not riding an uninsured bike, he is not riding a bike that isn't certified, his father most likely owns the bike so there is nothing you can do if he put his son on his insurance and let him ride it.
Get over it.
Last edited:
You're right, it doesn't matter. Insurance premium on motorcycles is based on the highest risk rider in the household. That's what Hedo is trying to say. This is all fun and games until something happens. Also, it's great that there's 10 years of (assuming dirtbike) riding experience, but last I checked, Minivans don't make left turns when you're on a trail.
#CatchMe anyone?
cbr600_brandon
Well-known member
thanks for the support at least you understand
cbr600_brandon
Well-known member
no I own the bike
Holy geez, how did I miss this trainwreck of a thread for so long?
I'm sure glad CBR600 and FlightTeam are all knowing and have found such interesting ways to exhibit such total disregard for laws and facts, while committing and condoning fraud, all while posting plenty of incriminating evidence online (statements, admissions, hell, even video!) for the police and their insurance companies to chew on if things happen to ever go horribly wrong.
I'm sure glad CBR600 and FlightTeam are all knowing and have found such interesting ways to exhibit such total disregard for laws and facts, while committing and condoning fraud, all while posting plenty of incriminating evidence online (statements, admissions, hell, even video!) for the police and their insurance companies to chew on if things happen to ever go horribly wrong.
FlightTeam6er
Well-known member
Hmm, I'm not sure how that works then. How can the person on the ownership claim they aren't the primary driver?
Something doesn't add up with this.
cbr600_brandon
Well-known member
because I bought the bike but its under my dads name he never rides only me
Bro. That means your Dad owns it. You're riding uninsured on a stolen bike.
GG.
FlightTeam6er
Well-known member
Dude, I just said that your dad must own it if he is the primary rider and your reply was "no I own the bike". If he is the owner he is the policy holder and you are just a second party that has permission to use it.
Last edited:
No, when he lives in the same house and is related, it doesn't work that way.
If it did why would ANYONE pay through the nose to put their kids on their insurance policies while they're living at home? Everyone would just not bother. Go ahead kids, drive the car, it's insured under my name, I'm just "loaning" it to you, no problem?
So, Bermuda is more or less correct. Dude is driving uninsured for all intents and purposes....because the $8000 quote he admits getting to actually have his name on the pink slip and be legal was too expensive, again, as he mentioned.
Further to that, for his dad to have insured the bike under his name he has told the insurance company that he is the primary and only rider (a lie, clearly, just to save his son from paying the insurance he admits to not being able to afford), so if he actually needs the insurance someday, the insurance company is going to nullify and cancel the policy immediately...leaving him holding the bag on on a potentially millions of dollars tort claim, in the right situation.
Not to mention the driving without insurance HTA tickets if ever caught. He *might* be able to get out of that one if the officer decides to cut him a break based on the fact the bike is actually insured, but the bike being in one name and a different one on the insurance slip will raise eyebrows and could still end bad for him.
Last edited:
- Status
