heads up! O.P.P. safety blitz this whole week. | Page 4 | GTAMotorcycle.com

heads up! O.P.P. safety blitz this whole week.

This is the topic that never ends, it just goes on and on my friends, some started posting not knowing what it is but will continue posting forever just because this is the topic that never ends it goes on and on my friends some started..............
 


lane splitting and filtering are two different things, and no they won't pull you over for filtering, because I’ve seen them filter traffic in Toronto myself and I followed one last year! lane splitting is when cars are moving at traffic flow and you cut through them yes thats dangerous!!!

filtering is when all cars are stopped at traffic light, alot of the people who do get harassed by cops rarely for this is because they were most likely "splitting" while cars were also moving, they don't bother when all cars are stopped in traffic and you filter because there is no "exact" law for it that says simply "filtering is illegal" so it's a huge hassle for them to ever get a conviction or get the right charge.

I know this is true for motorcycle cops because in summer 30+ heat they are not going to stick in traffic like a car for half an hour! i've seen them bend the rule too if i may sa so.lol... and for those of us who have air cooled bikes we have a a very good excuse when and IF we ever do get pulled, but franckly never been stopped for filtering ever by a cop! and you have to be smart about it too just with everything in life, lets say you are filtering in stopped traffic, and you see a cop car two or three cars ahead, just stop, where you are, and merge when the lights go green back into the lanes, if you pass a marked cop like that, something is wrong with the riders visions and shouldn't be riding in the first place! if its and unmarked one, those are not hard to find either, the odd chance you pass one, you already are up ahead get going fast and be on your way.


For everyone talking about the blitz issue, it's not to scare people, it's to warn the public of the excessive presence, because the public has the right to know what and why so many police forces and vehicles will be present and for what our tax money is going to be spent for, this also helps people save them selves from getting into big trouble and tickets. Otherwise people would be complaining on why so much police presance is there if we were not told about it, because lets face it people just find a way to complain about everything, and this is not just one week they "really" work, infact im one of those people who rather they be less on the streets even on a "normal" day so i can have some skilled and sensible fun, there are tooo many traffic unit cop cars out there! more cops dosen't mean better drivers, just means, more people getting caught being stupid, i rather be a safe, experienced rider who likes to have fun and not get caught with a fine all the time for something silly like using hand signals over my indicators or one dim bulb, because people feel the need to increase cops all the time because stupid careless people can't stop being who they are naturally and complainers, whiners and morons want an organisation they can pay to get rid of them, while the normal people in between get the stick from both ends.


Cops are not all the same, the everyday cops you see are TRAFFIC UNIT cops it's their job to enforce and fine people, there are cops in other divisions you never hear about or see because they are doing their jobs, investigating, narcotics, murder, homicides etc I never understood why people can't see this simple thing.


next time you get a ticket look at the bottom unit, it will say the cop is from a "traffic unit", if he was a homicide cop or detective or any other division and type of cop he would not even pull you over unless it was involved in his line of work, it’s that simple.lol all cops have the same basic authority but, all are split into specific devisions and jobs types and thats why you will find a traffic unit cop doing many different things, like triffic, murder investigation, but anything other then traffic they are just the temporary security till the real cops show up for that specific job.


also cops are NOT there to serve and protect people or you, their job is and has always been from the start of this type of force to, catch, arrest and charge people for breaking the law or rules, so if you get off, consider yourself extremely lucky, because they don't have to let you off it’s their job to charge you and fine or arrest you weather you and i like it or not, we did this to ourselves.


ever have a problem and you go to the cops and they can't help you until you feed them the exact proof or evidence and information of a suspect or problem, seems like you do all the leg work and they take the cake for that one too. again, it's not their job to protect and serve but to arrest and procecute, hope you all see the picture, they just make it seem like that, one person being arrested and charged fo someone looks like serving and protecting to the rest. "kill one person at a time, and no one will care, they will think its for "their" protection... when you are actually killing "THEM" ... the same people you are serving and protecting.... one by one"


The simple solution is for each human being to start taking their own responsibility, to start driving safer, start riding safer, and care about others, help others, protect others, don't fight or hate each other, if everyone pulled their own weight WE WOULD'NT NEED COPS! Or any other government or organizational help. People like to hate on God, but he gave us simple rules and commandments to follow, and if you read them it will make sense that he was saving us from this exact destruction we all are heading towards, everyone is complaining and fighting each other, never to really see the bigger picture. We are the problem, and only we can fix ourselves, no cop, no government force will or can protect us from our own evils, the smart evil selfish ones just use this knowledge against everyone to get richer.


BULL ****! I got nailed by and Armed Robbery Detective and the lil ****er showed up to traffic court. People need to start robbing eachother to keep those bastards busy
 
This is the topic that never ends, it just goes on and on my friends, some started posting not knowing what it is but will continue posting forever just because this is the topic that never ends it goes on and on my friends some started..............


I thought this was for the thread about the guy...and 2 or 3 guys...some company HR thing...pick up trucks...firefighters...the memory is fading slowly...where am i...what am i doing here...
 
I thought this was for the thread about the guy...and 2 or 3 guys...some company HR thing...pick up trucks...firefighters...the memory is fading slowly...where am i...what am i doing here...

Dooooood that one was epic... I think I might wander over there now
 
It reminds me of when the Border guards at Canada Customs decide to have a ZERO hour. They just pull in 100 vehicles and search them and harrass the people in them and make them feel like criminal and say insulting things. This happened to me and some friends in January. I lived in Niagara for 20 years so I'm used to these losers attitudes and GOD complexes.

What if during these zero hour shows, they got a directive from CSIS/RCMP/Homeland/CIA/FBI/Interpol that terrorists were going to breach the border? or that contraband was going to cross?

the people who bombed the London Underground were born UK citizens, just because you live in Niagara doesn’t make you LESS suspicious; if living in Niagara meant you would be given a break at the border.. all the terrorists would live in Niagara and then execute their diabolical plans

This reminds me of the indiscriminate ways of the OPP when they threaten the driving public: THEY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY'RE DOING. If they had an idea, they'd do something a lot more useful like pick out the drivers merging onto the 401 doing 50 km/h and towing trailers with stuff falling out or going by construction areas and tell the contractors to stop spilling dirt, rocks and crap all over the roads near their projects or find the overloaded concrete trucks spilling stones and concrete all over town.

you can’t be serious, are you trolling or are these your educated suggestions?

you want police to investigate which piece of stone/rock/debris dropped out of which truck? how exactly will police know which trucks blown tire is in the left lane.. or who’s box of bananas is stuck in the middle lane?

i guess it’s as easy as following the yellow brick road... RIGHT?

If you're in the law enforcement profession and you wonder why you never get a "thanks", the reasons are above. The Police have done everything that they can to make the public fear them whenever they get the opportunity. Announcing BLITZ's, G20, Frying an immigrant in the Vancouver airport and lying about it then being found guilty of obstruction of justice (Monty Robinson) and the list goes on. Blitz's are just one more example of how not to represent a police force that is actually interested in helping the public. If you're going to do it, why announce it to the public like you're out to punish them?
Lets stereotype the entire Canadian Police Force from Vancouver to Halifax for the choice actions of a few

*thumbs up* (how theassassin thinks)

A: Police fried immigrant at Airport
B: new immigrants arrive at Airport

A + B = All police fry new immigrants at airports*

*existential fallacy

You've got a good point.
It seems funny to me that when a cop catches you speeding, they have to say that "they saw a vehicle exceeding the speed limit in their estimation and they then checked the vehicle speed with radar to confirm"......goes right along with their "expert ability" to estimate speed which I think is total BS. There's no way that on a highway in heavy traffic that they can say that for certain, not to mention the old line "I didn't lose sight of the vehicle", hahahaha!
I can guarantee that their expert estimation of my speed would be a higher number than their Radar Gun says once the officer has a word with me on the side of the road, but that's my own choice.
I think the only way that this sort of evidence should be given is with a video clip of the incident with the speed of the vehicle displayed as the vehicle approaches. Show that video in court then I'd say, fine to whatever they deem is fitting for a charge. This technology exists already and I'm sure that the insurance companies would gladly foot the bill for the equipment!
why on god's green earth would insurance companies pay for it?

imagine doing traffic enforcement and reading vehicle speeds for hundreds of thousands of hours over 20yrs... i'm sure you'd have a very good idea as to how fast cars are travelling, especially if they're maintaining a certain speed

again you're living in this bubble where police work is fairy dust and magic; i guess you're also surprised how police get readings while driving in the opposite direction

i'd love to hear your opinions on speed enforcement from the sky done with a: stop watch
 
What if during these zero hour shows, they got a directive from CSIS/RCMP/Homeland/CIA/FBI/Interpol that terrorists were going to breach the border? or that contraband was going to cross?

the people who bombed the London Underground were born UK citizens, just because you live in Niagara doesn’t make you LESS suspicious; if living in Niagara meant you would be given a break at the border.. all the terrorists would live in Niagara and then execute their diabolical plans



you can’t be serious, are you trolling or are these your educated suggestions?

you want police to investigate which piece of stone/rock/debris dropped out of which truck? how exactly will police know which trucks blown tire is in the left lane.. or who’s box of bananas is stuck in the middle lane?

i guess it’s as easy as following the yellow brick road... RIGHT?

Lets stereotype the entire Canadian Police Force from Vancouver to Halifax for the choice actions of a few

*thumbs up* (how theassassin thinks)

A: Police fried immigrant at Airport
B: new immigrants arrive at Airport

A + B = All police fry new immigrants at airports*

*existential fallacy

why on god's green earth would insurance companies pay for it?

imagine doing traffic enforcement and reading vehicle speeds for hundreds of thousands of hours over 20yrs... i'm sure you'd have a very good idea as to how fast cars are travelling, especially if they're maintaining a certain speed

again you're living in this bubble where police work is fairy dust and magic; i guess you're also surprised how police get readings while driving in the opposite direction

i'd love to hear your opinions on speed enforcement from the sky done with a: stop watch

Wow I think you misread a lot of what assassin said dude. Are you a cop, you seem to have the IQ of one.

Ill just point out one thing you said... You said assassin claimed all police fry imagrants, re-read that please, you are misquoting like a champ!
 
On my commute home last night I was passed on the highway by an OPP cruiser doing an average of 150-160km/hr all the way from Milton to Kitchener.
I followed behind him (Behing another car aka speed dummy) doing 149km/hr the whole way home and everytime a car would move out of his way (As he would ride the cars *** in the fast lane till they moved) he would accelerate and start pulling away from us (About 160-170km/hr) and we would catch back up while he was waiting for the cars to move.

He was going no where important but still going fast enough were anyone else would get the HTA172 charge.

How do you know he was not going to a call or something? Anyways I would be careful if you decide to follow a vehicle like that, their unmarked SUV's are crazy stealth and you don't notice them until they light up like a Christmas tree
 
What if during these zero hour shows, they got a directive from CSIS/RCMP/Homeland/CIA/FBI/Interpol that terrorists were going to breach the border? or that contraband was going to cross?

the people who bombed the London Underground were born UK citizens, just because you live in Niagara doesn’t make you LESS suspicious; if living in Niagara meant you would be given a break at the border.. all the terrorists would live in Niagara and then execute their diabolical plans



you can’t be serious, are you trolling or are these your educated suggestions?

you want police to investigate which piece of stone/rock/debris dropped out of which truck? how exactly will police know which trucks blown tire is in the left lane.. or who’s box of bananas is stuck in the middle lane?

i guess it’s as easy as following the yellow brick road... RIGHT?

Lets stereotype the entire Canadian Police Force from Vancouver to Halifax for the choice actions of a few

*thumbs up* (how theassassin thinks)

A: Police fried immigrant at Airport
B: new immigrants arrive at Airport

A + B = All police fry new immigrants at airports*

*existential fallacy

why on god's green earth would insurance companies pay for it?

imagine doing traffic enforcement and reading vehicle speeds for hundreds of thousands of hours over 20yrs... i'm sure you'd have a very good idea as to how fast cars are travelling, especially if they're maintaining a certain speed

again you're living in this bubble where police work is fairy dust and magic; i guess you're also surprised how police get readings while driving in the opposite direction

i'd love to hear your opinions on speed enforcement from the sky done with a: stop watch

If the border guards catch a terrorist in a zero hour, good for them. It'd probably be the first time in about 25 years that I heard of them doing that since an IRA got caught back in the 80's in Niagara. In the mean-time they can show a bit of respect and maybe a bit of class during their questioning instead of acting like a bunch of a-holes. They can see who I am and they know I've been crossing the borders for most of my life with no problems, so why act like a-holes when they interact with you. This remimds me of what you get from police with bad attitudes = GOD COMPLEX. I wouldn't have such a problem with a zero hour if they actually accomplished something, otherwise it's just another "we have no idea what we're doing" activity.
If you don't think that insurance companies would be happy to buy radar/video equipment I'd say you should wear a helmet more often when you go dirt biking.

Your comments about investigating dirt, bananas and a brick in the road really miss the point as does most of the rest of your reply. A lot of people are getting tired of the way the Police represent themselves in the media and we're taking more notice when they do things wrong now.
The "New World Order" is based on being needed in the name of security and it will continue to grow unless people smarten up and stick up for their rights. I'm not a conspiracy nut or anything but this country is beginning to look a lot less like the Canada I grew up in starting over 40 years ago.

They might not fry an immigrant at the airport everyday but they've got no qualms about lying about it in court or with removing their nametags so they can beat protesters. That covers Vancouver and Toronto........could probably google some bad policing in Halifax too if you want.

My point is that Police have demonstrated too many times that they use bad judgement and are too abusive with their powers to give them the ability to ruin peoples lives by charging them with stunting, suspending licenses and towing a vehicle at just their own word. Penalties this stiff must be backed up with something other than the word of a policeman with a potetially poor attitude because a sportbike rider told him to go F***K himself because he's got a ****** attitude and acted like an a*****e when he got out of his cruiser.

I find your Airplane and stopwatch comment pretty funny because in court, both the airplane policeman and the traffic policeman would have to show up in court to give evidence together and this rarely happens. In the meantime it amounts to harrassment and ruining someones life in the process with no responsibility for f*****g with someones life.
Unlike yourself, I believe that estimation of speed is not always possible but a policeman can say he did in court. Where there's a lot at stake or a license was suspended or a vehicle towed or a stunting or evading charge was laid, there should be the requirement to have video evidence with a radar speed shown on the video. This already exists, why is it not required as mandatory for serious charges? -- its because we are being conditioned to accept the police word as gospel even if it ruins someones life......and there's no conviction afterwards, that's what upsets me. And no, I am not involved with any case like this by the way.

No sweat to them at all, business as usual. Once again the police can ruin someone's life and not be held responsible when there's no conviction.
 
Last edited:
Wow I think you misread a lot of what assassin said dude. Are you a cop, you seem to have the IQ of one.

Ill just point out one thing you said... You said assassin claimed all police fry imagrants, re-read that please, you are misquoting like a champ!
Holmes please try to read between the lines, i believe you've interpreted some of my previous posts as being satirical.. why not this one?

i even included an asterisk: existential fallacy

i guess i'll lay it down in layman: you can't generalize everyone based on the actions of a few... and that's what theassassin was doing

If the border guards catch a terrorist in a zero hour, good for them. It'd probably be the first time in about 25 years that I heard of them doing that since an IRA got caught back in the 80's in Niagara. In the mean-time they can show a bit of respect and maybe a bit of class during their questioning instead of acting like a bunch of a-holes. They can see who I am and they know I've been crossing the borders for most of my life with no problems, so why act like a-holes when they interact with you. This remimds me of what you get from police with bad attitudes = GOD COMPLEX. I wouldn't have such a problem with a zero hour if they actually accomplished something, otherwise it's just another "we have no idea what we're doing" activity.
If you don't think that insurance companies would be happy to buy radar/video equipment I'd say you should wear a helmet more often when you go dirt biking.

Your comments about investigating dirt, bananas and a brick in the road really miss the point as does most of the rest of your reply. A lot of people are getting tired of the way the Police represent themselves in the media and we're taking more notice when they do things wrong now.
The "New World Order" is based on being needed in the name of security and it will continue to grow unless people smarten up and stick up for their rights. I'm not a conspiracy nut or anything but this country is beginning to look a lot less like the Canada I grew up in starting over 40 years ago.

They might not fry an immigrant at the airport everyday but they've got no qualms with removing their nametags so they can beat protesters. That covers Vancouver and Toronto........could probably google some bad policing in Halifax too if you want.

My point is that Police have demonstrated too many times that they use bad judgement and are too abusive with their powers to give them the ability to ruin peoples lives by charging them with stunting, suspending licenses and towing a vehicle at just their own word. Penalties this stiff must be backed up with something other than the word of a policeman with a potetially poor attitude.

I find your Airplane and stopwatch comment pretty funny because in court, both the airplane policeman and the traffic policeman would have to show up in court to give evidence together and this rarely happens. In the meantime it amounts to harrassment and ruining someones life in the process with no responsibility for f*****g with someones life. No sweat to them at all, business as usual

CBSA have to treat everyone the same amount of scrutiny, are you suggesting that brown people with turbans (long-beard) and pajamas should be treated differently than white folks strolling across the border everyday?

what's the point of having border guards or a border at all? might as well leave it open for everyone to cross?

iirc you've so far suggested that police should: look for missing children, investigate road debris, target slow drivers in the "passing lane" & on-ramp RATHER than setup traffic enforcement points that target: aggressive/distracted/impaired drivers which could avert major traffic fatalities that have plagued GTA roads these past few weeks

i agree there are a few bad apples, but i'd like to stress that you can't generalize everyone.. most importantly don't blame the police, target the heart of the problem!

local residents, local councilmen, politicians and lawmakers; s172 wasn't written and put into law by the officer that gave impounded you for doing a +50 wheelie

most of the s172 trials have been in favour of police decisions by sitting judges (motorcycles filtering traffic); so it's not like 99% of the impounded vehicles have been wrongfully impounded; most people know they are in the wrong, but get reduced sentences to +49 or get off with a technicality but are already in the hole $1000 for the tow/impound + $3000 for the lawyer and who knows what for the 7-days of missed work + summons/trial dates
 
Holmes please try to read between the lines, i believe you've interpreted some of my previous posts as being satirical.. why not this one?

i even included an asterisk: existential fallacy

i guess i'll lay it down in layman: you can't generalize everyone based on the actions of a few... and that's what theassassin was doing



CBSA have to treat everyone the same amount of scrutiny, are you suggesting that brown people with turbans (long-beard) and pajamas should be treated differently than white folks strolling across the border everyday?

what's the point of having border guards or a border at all? might as well leave it open for everyone to cross?

iirc you've so far suggested that police should: look for missing children, investigate road debris, target slow drivers in the "passing lane" & on-ramp RATHER than setup traffic enforcement points that target: aggressive/distracted/impaired drivers which could avert major traffic fatalities that have plagued GTA roads these past few weeks

i agree there are a few bad apples, but i'd like to stress that you can't generalize everyone.. most importantly don't blame the police, target the heart of the problem!

local residents, local councilmen, politicians and lawmakers; s172 wasn't written and put into law by the officer that gave impounded you for doing a +50 wheelie

most of the s172 trials have been in favour of police decisions by sitting judges (motorcycles filtering traffic); so it's not like 99% of the impounded vehicles have been wrongfully impounded; most people know they are in the wrong, but get reduced sentences to +49 or get off with a technicality but are already in the hole $1000 for the tow/impound + $3000 for the lawyer and who knows what for the 7-days of missed work + summons/trial dates

Source please.


oh and....
*cough* Sgt. Dennis Mahoney-Bruer *cough*
 
You said
"CBSA have to treat everyone the same amount of scrutiny, are you suggesting that brown people with turbans (long-beard) and pajamas should be treated differently than white folks strolling across the border everyday?

what's the point of having border guards or a border at all? might as well leave it open for everyone to cross?"

My point was the "we have no idea what we're doing" zero hour activity, not the people you're describing. I said I've been crossing the border for many decades without problems, why act like an a-hole when they're dealing with the public, there's no excuse for their attitudes and GOD complexes, similar to OPP with their Blitz's - "We have no idea what we're doing so we announce another blitz".

you said "iirc you've so far suggested that police should: look for missing children, investigate road debris, target slow drivers in the "passing lane" & on-ramp"
-----yea, what could I be thinking???

you said: "RATHER than setup traffic enforcement points that target: aggressive/distracted/impaired drivers which could avert major traffic fatalities that have plagued GTA roads these past few weeks"
--------with the amount of traffic fatalities lately, I'd say the Police are failing miserably at prevent and educating. No wonder because they're more worried about announcing BLITZ's.
 
iFly55, you fabricate arguments like cops fabricate evidence. You read what ever you wanted and replied totally out of context. For example theassassin asked for some respect at the border, you tried to make him look racist. Awesome!
 
Lots of OPP from Gooderham all the way east through Bancroft to the Quebec border at Shawville today. Not sure if that's normal or not, but I went by quite a few cruisers and was followed by one from just east of Gooderham all the way in to Bancroft where he turned around and headed back west. No OPP on 507, though.
 
tumblr_lz4v0bzq2t1qd2avdo1_500.gif
 

Back
Top Bottom