Ghomeshigate

If charges are laid against Ghomeshi and he is convicted and winds up in jail, he may get to experience the other side of his enthusiasm for "rough play". No doubt his new bestest buddies will ensure everything is consensual.
 
Yes, I would try, at least I think I would. But thankfully I've never been in that situation, so I don't know


Oh and regarding "they enjoyed it which is why they didn't go to the police"

Seriously ??? Give your head a shake.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ok. So the dude is in S&M, so what's the big deal? He chokes and slaps her a few times. She plays along. He then demands the head. She plays along. He closes with an intercourse. She plays along.
After all is done, he puts on his "nice" guy hat and, perhaps, offers her a fat-free yogurt from his fridge and a sleep over. Yet again, she plays along.
She leaves in the morning and doesn't call the cops.

Sounds like both parties had a good time.
Definetely no rape or assault here.

Why does she all of a sudden decides to come forward now?
a. Money
b. Fame
c. Jealousy
d. All of the above

I bet if the guy was nobody, this wouldn't even make the news.
 
But he never offered to get her a job for sex, he asked her out, banged her and AFTER that he said ill see what i can do for you.
She used him to get ahead in life

He got laid and tried to hook her up in exchange

This sounds a lot like the plot to every backroom casting video....
 
Ok. So the dude is in S&M, so what's the big deal? He chokes and slaps her a few times. She plays along. He then demands the head. She plays along. He closes with an intercourse. She plays along.
After all is done, he puts on his "nice" guy hat and, perhaps, offers her a fat-free yogurt from his fridge and a sleep over. Yet again, she plays along.
She leaves in the morning and doesn't call the cops.

Sounds like both parties had a good time.
Definetely no rape or assault here.

Why does she all of a sudden decides to come forward now?
a. Money
b. Fame
c. Jealousy
d. All of the above

I bet if the guy was nobody, this wouldn't even make the news.


With most of the women remaining anonymous I doubt it's those reasons.
 
I can't believe how some people think. I guess the victims of Graham James, Gordon Stuckless, Jerry Sandusky, and all the priests wanted it. The choir boys continued to go t to church, Sheldon Kennedy and Theo Fleury continued to play hockey, Sandusky's victims continued to play football, and these are only a few that went public, there's so many that never go public. It's hard for a person to come forward, they feel they will be blamed, they feel they are the only one, they are afraid to face the person in court. There's so many reasons. People are afraid of ruining their careers.
Well said.

It appears that the two women who have openly come forward are women who were definitely not consenting in any way and were assaulted.
 
Ok. So the dude is in S&M, so what's the big deal? He chokes and slaps her a few times. She plays along. He then demands the head. She plays along. He closes with an intercourse. She plays along.
After all is done, he puts on his "nice" guy hat and, perhaps, offers her a fat-free yogurt from his fridge and a sleep over. Yet again, she plays along.
She leaves in the morning and doesn't call the cops.

Sounds like both parties had a good time.
Definetely no rape or assault here.

Why does she all of a sudden decides to come forward now?
a. Money
b. Fame
c. Jealousy
d. All of the above

I bet if the guy was nobody, this wouldn't even make the news.

Do you really think that little of women that all they want is to take down the successful male at any cost. What a petty and pathetic world view. The guy just has to say "its all in good fun" and you believe that over 8 women who never knew each other and all have very similar stories. These women are clear it WAS NOT consensual they are all stating that and its pretty clear to anyone why they didn't come forward against a popular radio host. People like you saying they wanted it or are just after money despite all of the facts pointing out how wrong you are. Please educate yourself about this case before you give an ignorant opinion. False reporting rape and abuse is 3-5% yet you would believe that its a 3% and assume they are false reporting. It couldn't possibly that a successful man is a serial abuser. Just look at Jimmy Saville and BBC. If you can't figure out why someone might be too embarrassed and shammed to go tell the police and have their entire lives ripped apart and be questioned about things like 'what were you wearing' and other ******** that has nothing to do with the fact that someone attacked them without consent. A lot of rape and abuse goes unreported because of exactly how people like yourself assume the worst of any women despite the facts blowing your opinion away.

Jian Gomeshi is a creep and an abuser. 8 women now have come forward and none of them have anything to gain from this. Reporting rape doesn't give you fame it gets you harassed by ********. There is no money and if you truly believe 8 women who have successful careers are just Jealous I can't help that level of disfunctional thought.
 
Jian Gomeshi is a creep and an abuser. 8 women now have come forward and none of them have anything to gain from this. Reporting rape doesn't give you fame it gets you harassed by ********. There is no money and if you truly believe 8 women who have successful careers are just Jealous I can't help that level of disfunctional thought.
Agree!

and this was posted on another forum that addresses the reasons of why some people do not leave the situation or do not report abuse immediately.
its called disassociative shock. when confronted with a traumatic situation that is so outside of the norm and psychologically overwhelming, people often disassociate and their mind goes somewhere else. you brain just splits off so your conscious self doesn't have to register the trauma. you become passive and thoughtless.

oftentimes this is followed by dissassociative amnesia, ptsd or somatization - people will start suffering from vague pains with no physiological cause (there are cases of people going blind after experiencing trauma - when nothing was actually wrong with their eyes at all). vaginismus for example, which is when a womans vagina contracts whenever any kind of penetration is about to occur, is oftentimes as a result of a previous traumatic sexual experience.

the other thing that happens in some cases, is that a woman, when put in such a situation, will make a conscious decision to just go along with what is happening, in order to avoid a graver ending. if someones trying to rape you and you dont think you would be able to get away if you fought, or you think that if you resist it could become worse, it makes sense to just submit in order to get it over with faster.

i saw in some comments on some article, a person was questioning why only years later people come forward about abuses that have happened in the past. its pretty much because of dissassociative shock - after the event, the person will compartmentalize the experience in the subconscious so they dont have to process it. then maybe they get some somatic illness, or ptsd, or they just act out and they dont know why. it takes many years but eventually those compartmentalized/split off memories resurface in the conscious mind, and at that time the person is forced to process what happened.

dissasociative shock is the underlying factor in people who suffer from dissassociative identity disorder - multiple and repeated severe psychological trauma will sometimes split a person so much that they develop other personalities to help them cope with what they have gone through. but thats on the extreme end.

-source: nursing school/dsm IV/personal experience
 
Jian Gomeshi is a creep and an abuser. 8 women now have come forward and none of them have anything to gain from this. Reporting rape doesn't give you fame it gets you harassed by ********. There is no money and if you truly believe 8 women who have successful careers are just Jealous I can't help that level of disfunctional thought.

It's 9 women now. And two of the ones that actually came forward publicly, one was a lawyer, and the other is an actress (so she had her own fame so pretty sure she wasn't looking for this kind of fame) and is now a captain in the Royal Canadian Air Force.

So please all of you think these women are looking for fame, give your head a shake. the only thing that has changed is that now they realize they are not alone in their experience and people are listening
 
So from a legal perspective, [...], I can see how this would fall apart if tested in court.

[...]

So basically the defence lawyer will slut shame the victim, ask how many people she's slept with, and if she had a brazilian wax before meeting up with the perpetrator, all this while the perpetrator sits there and enjoys watching the victim be victimized AGAIN

This is why the system is a joke, and women don't come forward


Princess's Man says: This is incorrect. Evidence to "slut shame" a victim (sexual history, provocative dress, etc) is not admissible in court. With that said, though, Princess's Man agrees with your statement that the legal system is very difficult for victims.
 
We're voting? Nobody said we're voting. I'm not ready yet.
 
the fact that someone attacked them without consent

As an FYI, the absence of resistance, physically or verbally, makes this very consensual.
Not the money/fame/jealousy thing? Well, perhaps, shecouldn't live with the fact that he stopped bonning her then?

Remember, she had a nerve to accept his invitation and flyout of her province to visit him at his house after flirting with him at thatbook signing event. What was she expecting? A job interview?
 
As an FYI, the absence of resistance, physically or verbally, makes this very consensual.
Not the money/fame/jealousy thing? Well, perhaps, shecouldn't live with the fact that he stopped bonning her then?

Remember, she had a nerve to accept his invitation and flyout of her province to visit him at his house after flirting with him at thatbook signing event. What was she expecting? A job interview?

Let me repeat

The Supreme Court has said that consent that is given only in advance isn’t determinative – consent is an ongoing process and a person must be in a state of consciousness to be able to withdraw that consent at any time. What happened WAS NOT CONSENSUAL

Also when it comes to BDSM (as Jian claims it was) the law doesn’t actually care about consent. The Supreme Court has said that a person cannot consent to an assault that causes bodily harm.

Oh yeah, I'm sure she flew out to see him fully knowing she was going to be punched, slapped, choked

your comment was so f'n ignorant it hurt my eyes to even read it.
 
As an FYI, the absence of resistance, physically or verbally, makes this very consensual.
Not the money/fame/jealousy thing? Well, perhaps, shecouldn't live with the fact that he stopped bonning her then?

Remember, she had a nerve to accept his invitation and flyout of her province to visit him at his house after flirting with him at that book signing event. What was she expecting? A job interview?

You obviously don't understand consent or how it works.

Are you really suggesting these now 9 women are all just jealous of a Jian's magic dick? You can't be that ignorant can you?

Again you don't understand consent. Flirting with someone and coming to visit them is not an invitation for abuse. Did you really just right "What was she expecting" as an implication that visiting someone is consent to anything other than what the personal want to allow. Please educate yourself on how consent works in Canada before you end up raping someone thinking that being flirty is consenting to be beaten and rapped.

You sir are an example rape culture in fine form. disgraceful. Keep digging your hole.

Is it just women you think so little of or do you think Fleury must have 'wanted it' from Graham James? Did the alter boys just want more fame/attention from the priests? Must have been the money then right? Would you apply any of the other ignorant reasonings to these other cases of abuse and rape? Why only women? please think long and hard about your view of women.
 
Even the BDSM community is saying what he did is assault, not BDSM.

The problem with everything that is currently hitting the news is that it needs to be said to police, privately, rather than widely broadcast. This is because putting all of the details out there makes it more difficult to prove, in a court of law, that he did these things. It contaminates possible evidence and people who do that sort of thing need to be hammered by the law and the courts, so that they are no longer free to abuse new victims.
 
It's 9 women now. And two of the ones that actually came forward publicly, one was a lawyer, and the other is an actress (so she had her own fame so pretty sure she wasn't looking for this kind of fame) and is now a captain in the Royal Canadian Air Force.

So please all of you think these women are looking for fame, give your head a shake. the only thing that has changed is that now they realize they are not alone in their experience and people are listening

Indeed!
 
Even the BDSM community is saying what he did is assault, not BDSM.

The problem with everything that is currently hitting the news is that it needs to be said to police, privately, rather than widely broadcast. This is because putting all of the details out there makes it more difficult to prove, in a court of law, that he did these things. It contaminates possible evidence and people who do that sort of thing need to be hammered by the law and the courts, so that they are no longer free to abuse new victims.

This brings up a very good and greater issue and that is how police deal with rape cases and cases of assault. A large portion of victims don't go to police for various reasons all of them valid especially in cases where someone is famous. The good thing to come out of all this is that people are talking about sexual violence toward women and discussing the obstacles victims face.
 
Also when it comes to BDSM (as Jian claims it was) the law doesn’t actually care about consent. The Supreme Court has said that a person cannot consent to an assault that causes bodily harm.

Even within the scene you always discuss boundaries before and some people may want some bruising or perhaps even bite marks. The supreme courts puts BDSM practicers in a weird position with this ruling but its difficult to make laws to fit all sex acts in i suppose.

Its considered impolite to force anyone into it. If you are dating someone from outside of the scene you are supost to broach the subject first not just up and slap them and claim "its my fetish". This is a black eye for the BDSM community that is already grossly misunderstood.
 
This brings up a very good and greater issue and that is how police deal with rape cases and cases of assault. A large portion of victims don't go to police for various reasons all of them valid especially in cases where someone is famous. The good thing to come out of all this is that people are talking about sexual violence toward women and discussing the obstacles victims face.

It's a difficult situation all around, made no less so by the person's (relative) fame. If it's ever going to stop, though, it requires prosecution.
 
Back
Top Bottom