Ghomeshigate

also femmechick, you seem to write from a feminist point of view.

am i right ? maybe that why you cant see why some women love to be dominated. and maybe feel shame for it after.
 
also femmechick, you seem to write from a feminist point of view.

am i right ? maybe that why you cant see why some women love to be dominated. and maybe feel shame for it after.

What does that have to do with Feminism?

Is the reason you keep bringing up people not reporting acts right away (even though the reason have been state repeatedly) because your a misogynist?
 
BDSM has been around since long before the book, sweetie.

an air force captain trained to fight, cant fight off JG ?

hell hath no fury like a woman used and abused.

none of you friends like 50 shades, but all your friends friends love it ?

All my friends couldn't be bothered to waste their time reading poorly written fiction. I had 1 acquaintance and HER married friends read 50 shades and Twilight and loved both.

as for the rest, not one phone call to police ? do none of these ladies have a man or women that saw these bruises and asked WTF ?????
i can assure you, if my GF/Wife/ friend shows up with bruises, Im asking wtf happened, and then Im getting arrested after laying a beatdown myself on who did it.

How nice of you, you let your wife date others?

i honestly believe theres more reasonable doubt on the complainants.

i will say this though... where are all JG's BDSM partners now ?
The BDSM community has come out strongly AGAINST JG

why aren't they supporting him saying that they enjoy it... you gotta figure some of these women like it..
Actually these women didn't, and AGAIN the BDSM community has spoken against JG.

maybe they are too embarrassed to admit they enjoy being hit .
If that were the case they wouldn't have come forward in the first place

Your so clueless when it comes to women i can't even be bothered
 
also femmechick, you seem to write from a feminist point of view.

I write from 2014 where I believe in EQUALITY for everyone. Not 1854.

am i right ? maybe that why you cant see why some women love to be dominated. and maybe feel shame for it after.

BHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Again, you think women care THAT much about a casual hookup


BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

BHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHY

My friends will have a good little chuckle over that this weekend.

we'll conduct a survey. I'll let you know

but in the meantime

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
 
Last edited:
What does that have to do with Feminism?

Is the reason you keep bringing up people not reporting acts right away (even though the reason have been state repeatedly) because your a misogynist?

When in doubt the person with the weaker position will generally go for the ad hominem attack. No need to follow suit ;)
 
What does that have to do with Feminism?

Is the reason you keep bringing up people not reporting acts right away (even though the reason have been state repeatedly) because your a misogynist?

LOL im not a misogynist.

i love chicks. all chicks. I just dont trust them. huge difference.

you never can tell what a woman is thinking. no-one can....lol
 
When in doubt the person with the weaker position will generally go for the ad hominem attack. No need to follow suit ;)

While it is an Ad Hom Its not fallacious as it relates to credibility of his statements. I refer you to his Previous Generalizations that women are all vindictive. Its not an insult its an accurate description of his positions. Just as its not A Fallacious ad hom to call out a white supremacist for being racist.
 
While it is an Ad Hom Its not fallacious as it relates to credibility of his statements. I refer you to his Previous Generalizations that women are all vindictive. Its not an insult its an accurate description of his positions. Just as its not A Fallacious ad hom to call out a white supremacist for being racist.

Actually I was pointing at his ad hominem attack, then cautioning you that it doesn't make your own argument any stronger by using the same tactic. If you were going to go that route, anyway, then it might have been better to wait and point out the irony of someone who refers to woman as "chicks" and "sweetie" claiming to not be a misogynist ;)
 
I write from 2014 where I believe in EQUALITY for everyone. Not 1854.



BHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Again, you think women care THAT much about a casual hookup


BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

BHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHY

My friends will have a good little chuckle over that this weekend.

we'll conduct a survey. I'll let you know

but in the meantime

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


but what if the women werent looking at JG as a casual hookup ? what if they were looking for maybe a husband or long term monogamous relationship.

and the reason i asked about your feminism, is becasue you would look at this case from an entirely different perspective than anyone else.

of course a feminist is going to have issues with a man that dominates women.
 
Actually I was pointing at his ad hominem attack, then cautioning you that it doesn't make your own argument any stronger by using the same tactic. If you were going to go that route, anyway, then it might have been better to wait and point out the irony of someone who refers to woman as "chicks" and "sweetie" claiming to not be a misogynist ;)

Yea i suppose you are right. Sometimes its hard to resist the low hanging fruit
 
but what if the women werent looking at JG as a casual hookup ? what if they were looking for maybe a husband or long term monogamous relationship.

and the reason i asked about your feminism, is becasue you would look at this case from an entirely different perspective than anyone else.

of course a feminist is going to have issues with a man that dominates women.

I don't really see any difference between her position and that of any woman, who just plain doesn't want to be beaten.
 
of course a feminist is going to have issues with a man that dominates women.

Im a feminist and i don't have any issues with it as long as we are talking about consensual sexual role play. There is nothing in feminism that would prevent either party being a DOM or a SUB as long as its mutually agreeable.
Now if we are talking about a man who wants to dominate women outside of mutual sexual understandings then even you must see a problem with that. Especially if we are talking about the use of violence or verbal abuse.
 
but what if the women werent looking at JG as a casual hookup ? what if they were looking for maybe a husband or long term monogamous relationship.

OMG!!!! This was even funnier than your last one

BJHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

BTW, it was the married & bored women that liked 50 shades....just saying....arent'y you married, you seem to know quite a bit about 50 shades. I know as much about 50 shades as i know about the Kardashians - they exist, and and nothing else.

But back to that whole husband comment

BAHAHAHYAHAHAHYAHAHAHAHAHAH

and the reason i asked about your feminism, is becasue you would look at this case from an entirely different perspective than anyone else.

of course a feminist is going to have issues with a man that dominates women.

You'll never get it, so I'm not going to bother anymore. There's an old saying in Italian, something about a donkey and stubbornness, and resisting change...I'll have to ask mom.

But my god,
what if they were looking for maybe a husband or long term monogamous relationship
was the BEST!!!!


BHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
 
My wife liked it :(

But you don't seem to have a problem understanding what women like/need.

Not like some of the posters who ask dumb questions like "if I spank her will I be accused of rape 10 years later, because the girl I was with felt jilted because I didn't wife her"

You get it, I wouldn't worry about it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
You guys continue on but I am just going to say:

Most woman don't know what woman want/need, you know what YOU want/need but you don't know what others want/need.. and if you believe your best friend is telling you the truth about what she wants/needs you are blind to the realities of today's peoples REAL sexual desires.

..and it is easy to take the side of the "victims" and take an air of superior intellect like Rob M always does, but the reality is, you are all so blinded by your little misconceptions and prejudices that you are not able to open your mind to other possibilities and all you do is judge others accordingly.

Now I have work to do.
 
You guys continue on but I am just going to say:

Most woman don't know what woman want/need, you know what YOU want/need but you don't know what others want/need.. and if you believe your best friend is telling you the truth about what she wants/needs you are blind to the realities of today's peoples REAL sexual desires.

..and it is easy to take the side of the "victims" and take an air of superior intellect like Rob M always does, but the reality is, you are all so blinded by your little misconceptions and prejudices that you are not able to open your mind to other possibilities and you do is judge others that do.

Now I have work to do.

Your just as hysterical as the last guy with his misconceptions & prejudices about women.

As for the superior intellect, it really hasn't been that hard.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top Bottom