Ghomeshigate

If only real life where that easy, I can tell you first hand this is not always the case and it's way too complicated to even beginning to explain, justify or help you understand.
Either way I'm sure you will just chalk it up to either it was deserved or subliminally desired. Not even close ..


so if someone is treating you like an animal, slapping you, spanking you, squeezing your neck, you wouldnt ask them to stop , go get help or tell someone ?

ok then.
 
Lesbians sticking up for BDSM ? hehe

She can't recall how all those emails got deleted, what she knew or didn't know, what happened to that billion dollars plus, but what goes on in your bedroom? Oh lets stick our nose into that...jesus, these ****en politicians make me sick

so if someone is treating you like an animal, slapping you, spanking you, squeezing your neck, you wouldnt ask them to stop , go get help or tell someone ?

ok then.

Clearly the protocol in such a situation is to go on a second and third date and see if this behavior continues. Then years later say that you never consented...
 
Clearly the protocol in such a situation is to go on a second and third date and see if this behavior continues. Then years later say that you never consented...
You keep repeating this. Where did you get that from?
 
Some guy, a former university peer of Jian's is claiming that some unwanted fondling went on.

http://m.thestar.com/#/article/news...s_of_complaints_during_york_student_days.html

Well holy sh*t!!! Finally!!! A victim who doesn't appear to be lying about JG's assault. Must be because he's a MAN.

Hmmm, but why didn't he report it? Why did he wait 20+ years to report it?? Oh never mind....he's a man so it must be true. Oh yeah AND he grabbed him by the arm and told him to "stop".
 
Ghomeshi invited her to visit him in Toronto at his house in Cabbagetown, she says, and she did.

When she arrived at his house and greeted him, she says Ghomeshi answered the door and stared at her. Without speaking, she alleges that he threw her against the wall and demanded that she get on her knees and perform fellatio. She alleges that when she kneeled down he struck her repeatedly about the head, “hard enough that (her) vision was blurred.”

She says he took his belt off, tied it tight around her neck, “yanked” it, and led her around by the belt. They had intercourse, she said, and during it she alleges he whipped her back with his belt and hit her about the head. She alleges he put his full body weight on her face during fellatio, to the point where she gagged, couldn’t breathe, and felt she would vomit. A subsequent encounter, she alleges, left her with deep bruising on her body.


ecb262572f7e6eacadc00b36213694c79da2055cfb416386d05109bcf735e727.jpg

You keep repeating this. Where did you get that from?

From the official recollection of the women involved in this story. That's straight from their mouth...
 
Looks like he just hired one of the country's best criminal attorney's

Marie Henien

and 2 of her partners

Danielle Robitaille
&
Scott Hutchison
 
Last edited:
From the official recollection of the women involved in this story. That's straight from their mouth...

That was only ONE account, what about the other 8?
 
Actually it was 2

If i tell you 9 stories and 2 out of them were lies, you gonna believe the other 7 or you gonna be a lil suspicious?

I only remember one, quote the 2nd one please
 
I ain't doing all the work for you. The least you can do is read the damn whole story...

I'm not the one saying it was two.

As far as I have read (and I have read A LOT), it was only one.
 
Well holy sh*t!!! Finally!!! A victim who doesn't appear to be lying about JG's assault. Must be because he's a MAN.

Hmmm, but why didn't he report it? Why did he wait 20+ years to report it?? Oh never mind....he's a man so it must be true. Oh yeah AND he grabbed him by the arm and told him to "stop".

lol @ how you think.


anyways... my guess was he didnt report it cause it wasnt as bad as he makes it seem ?
and the reason hes telling his story because the newspapers pay ?

thats my guess.
 
lol @ how you think.


anyways... my guess was he didnt report it cause it wasnt as bad as he makes it seem ?
and the reason hes telling his story because the newspapers pay ?

thats my guess.

You guess wrong. Shopping line tabloids pay. Newspapers don't.
 
lol @ how you think.


anyways... my guess was he didnt report it cause it wasnt as bad as he makes it seem ?
and the reason hes telling his story because the newspapers pay ?

thats my guess.

But he must be telling the truth, right?

It's the 9 women that are lying, right?

If it wasn't as bad as he makes it seem, why come forward in the first place?

Lol, @ newspapers paying for something that's got a surplus supply (ie. JG stories of assault)

Unfortunately I'm not convinced that JG will be charged, and if he he is, that he'll be convicted. This doesn't mean I think he's innocent. No, he's a predatory POS.

So now there are 10 accounts of JG's douchey behavior. All these accounts published in the media. The problem is, one could argue yes, it's Similar facts, and other would argue that the victims have corroborated their stories. I don't mean it's done on purpose, but it's that they have heard the other accounts. Evidence cannot be biased. That's the problem now, the evidence is biased.

However, I stand firmly behind my statement, JG is a predatory POS.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
I ain't doing all the work for you. The least you can do is read the damn whole story...

So you're talking about the case of Lucy DeCoutere and assuming that her saying that she "saw him twice again" meant that she went on two more dates with him over the weekend, rather than was just in the same place at the same time? I've already commented on that a couple of times before now.

But he must be telling the truth, right?

It's the 9 women that are lying, right?

If it wasn't as bad as he makes it seem, why come forward in the first place?

Lol, @ newspapers paying for something that's got a surplus supply (ie. JG stories of assault)

Unfortunately I'm not convinced that JG will be charged, and if he he is, that he'll be convicted. This doesn't mean I think he's innocent. No, he's a predatory POS.

So now there are 10 accounts of JG's douchey behavior. All these accounts published in the media. The problem is, one could argue yes, it's Similar facts, and other would argue that the victims have corroborated their stories. I don't mean it's done on purpose, but it's that they have heard the other accounts. Evidence cannot be biased. That's the problem now, the evidence is biased.

However, I stand firmly behind my statement, JG is a predatory POS.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The best part of that Star article was the comment Hounslow attributed to Ghomeshi that Hounslow was "macho, violent and homophobic." Typical deflection; making the victim into the bad guy. If he'd done the same to me, when I was that age, he'd have been picking up teeth rather than just nursing a sore arm, and it wouldn't have had anything to do with homophobia. It would have been a violent reaction to a sexual assault.
 
So you're talking about the case of Lucy DeCoutere and assuming that her saying that she "saw him twice again" meant that she went on two more dates with him over the weekend, rather than was just in the same place at the same time? I've already commented on that a couple of times before now.

I agree with your interpretation which is how I read it. Especially since most of the time actresses are in Toronto are for press or media obligations so its not uncommon to bump into the same people all weekend long at events. Its hard to avoid people in this industry as its so small.

I feel if Lucy meant 'saw him' as more than just visual she would have explained in more detail about those encounters as opposed to the passing reference when you just see someone.
 
He seemed like such a nice fellow on the radio. I don't have any sense of how much of a challenge he would be in a street fight tho. Of course if I were socially or professionally engaged with him I'd have sized him up as I do with every male. If I'd felt reasonably confident, including accounting for adrenalin rush, I'd have beat the snot out of him. Hate to admit this in these gentle times but homophobia would have been major driver. Oh well.
 
Back
Top Bottom