Jay Alexander
Well-known member
As a younger person (close to 40, but pretty sure younger than the median age here), I see a lot of anecdotes about really naive/misinformed/straight dumb younger people being referenced in this thread.
Making a sweeping generalization comparing two generations is meaningless. Pointing a finger at a stupid 20 year old kid saying "See? This generation is wasted" is not only a common bias (frequency illusion and salience), but it's also not constructive.
The fact is that cost of housing (rent AND owning) in the GTA has far outpaced the median incomes of people new in their careers. It is actually insane the difference a low-skilled factory job provided for 20-30 years ago compared to today. Simply put, the younger generation - naive/dumb/smart/lazy/hard-working - all have the shorter end of the stick of people who simply bought earlier.
This market is messed.
Making a sweeping generalization comparing two generations is meaningless. Pointing a finger at a stupid 20 year old kid saying "See? This generation is wasted" is not only a common bias (frequency illusion and salience), but it's also not constructive.
The fact is that cost of housing (rent AND owning) in the GTA has far outpaced the median incomes of people new in their careers. It is actually insane the difference a low-skilled factory job provided for 20-30 years ago compared to today. Simply put, the younger generation - naive/dumb/smart/lazy/hard-working - all have the shorter end of the stick of people who simply bought earlier.
This market is messed.