Others worried about getting infected can control their own risk by not going out.
Ah yes the goalposts have moved now, instead of keeping people out of the hospital
now it's about keeping them out of the hospital
ever. If it means bankrupting our economy and saddling young people like me with tons of debt, then no thanks. Let people assess their own risk and make their own decisions. If you're deathly afraid of catching the bug - stay home.
Speaking of the rules...which rules are we going by? They seem to change all the time. In March - May it was about keeping the hospital curve low. Well, we were under even the model's best case scenario so that was good.
Now we're at 1/6 of what we were at the spring peak...and we're back to closing things again. We've also been at ~800 cases provincially for almost a month. Any sign the new measures are going anything against the case count? Nope.
Sounds a lot more like "I'm at risk and don't want to go out, therefore no one should be able to." About wanting to play -- I'm not asking to open nightclubs or anything like that. But wanting to go the gym and not spend the entire winter cooped up in a 700 sqft apartment doesn't seem totally unreasonable. Also tell the small restaurant owner that they're "wanting to play" by wanting a chance of staying in business this winter. Or all the other small businesses that won't survive this thing due to government imposed lockdowns. They're just selfish right?
We don't know a lot of things. It doesn't mean we should just arbitrarily lock things down. There is a cost for that which we are starting to see now, for example here is a data point:
Most recent News News business news stories and video from CP24
www.cp24.com
We also know the substance abuse, suicides, and drug problems are also much higher than in previous years. Is it worth the cost?
Anyway I'm tired of debating it. You live your life, I'll live mine. See you on roads out there sometime.