Church Burnings - Are these Hate Crimes? | Page 3 | GTAMotorcycle.com

Church Burnings - Are these Hate Crimes?

I would think that if the church wanted to bury evidence, they would just disappear it without burning down the building. On the other hand, I think many of the churches burned down were unused so maybe the church decided to monetize their asset (eg insurance fraud) while at the same time hoping the people besmirching their "good" name would take the blame.
Lot of what’s ifs all around. And anything is possible.

‘Never let a good crisis go to waste’
 
I get annoyed by some of those arguments too. For instance fire fighters have to pass a physical fitness test that was theoretically based on the demands of the job. In some cases, females were allowed to do a test with a lower bar. wtf. Was the original test based on the demands of the job? Are the females doing a different job? Sure, look at the test and adjust it if it was not relevant to the work required, but a pass or fail shouldn't be dependent on the participants anything other than score.

People argue that women aren't strong enough to be firefighters. Here's why they're wrong.
 
That's a hate crime. Please report yourself to the nearest rcmp office for processing.


Meanwhile in canada....

Indigenous woman yells 'I hate white people' while punching caucasian, but it's not a hate crime: Judge
If it were "I hate *insert any non white group* people" but not followed by a punch it would be considered a hate crime.

Its only a hate crime if its committed by a white person.

BLM Toronto Co-founder back a few years ago
 
I would think that if the church wanted to bury evidence, they would just disappear it without burning down the building. On the other hand, I think many of the churches burned down were unused so maybe the church decided to monetize their asset (eg insurance fraud) while at the same time hoping the people besmirching their "good" name would take the blame.
Lots of possibilities but that does not fit the white victim narrative....

I agree, likely underused before and very likely after things of late. maybe not used at all... Who owned these buildings and were they insured, did they generate revenue? So if the church owned them or the band, or???, arson for the insurance money is not a hate crime. Great time to do it BTW if you want to deflect blame.

Any evidence in these buildings would be hard to deal with today, someone may notice the actions.... So arson does a good cleansing job. Again not a hate crime.

Maybe the deity (if you believe) decided that given the crimes committed the buildings needed cleansing.... act of god or working in some "mysterious way", leave this one out as far fetched if you do not believe of course. But not a hate crime.

Of course as I noted in my first post in this thread, the victims of the church have more than ample motive, this one could be considered a hate crime or maybe straight up revenge which is not always a hate crime but maybe a fine line.

All the above are crimes and wrong BTW (even the deity IMO). And of course there may be a mix of the above, some were one, some another. Until someone is caught what do we know for sure.

But lets go back to the original narrative that it is all a hate crime, what does that say????? obvious bias without considering the other possibilities.
 
Awesome posts, all of them.
 
Oof….I’m going to start a thread about weight loss. Not cool. I’m hurt.

You’re a racist against Polaks!

Woah now, careful with those baseless accusations.

You might get the Ban Hammer.

Or in your case:

artisan-nail-polish-remover-100-percent-pure-acetone.jpg
 
I guess you can't rule out church leaders torching their own churches. Now I'll have to reconsider thinking that 'white hooded rednecks' burn Black churches in the deep south -- and start considering it might be BLM.
Wouldnt suprise me. Our culture is filled with professional victims and phonies.

Jussie Smollett etc Heres one from a couple of days ago:

 
Awesome. If 70% of the women that attempt the physical fitness test can pass it (and it's the same test as the men who pass 75% of the time), that seems like the system is working to ensure candidates can do the job.
That article is laughable.

It isnt the same test. If it was there would be no way the average female could come close to the same passing rate as the average man.
The fact is these dumb SJWs dont understand that safety takes precedent above silly quotas. Men are significantly bigger and stronger. These are the required traits of a firefighter. The average woman cannot carry a 180-200lb person out of a burning building.

99% of women have no interest in becoming firefighters
 
That article is laughable.

It isnt the same test. If it was there would be no way the average female could come close to the same passing rate as the average man.
The fact these dumb SJWs dont understand that safety takes precedent above silly quotas. Men are significantly bigger and stronger. These are the required traits of a firefighter. The average woman cannot carry a 180-200lb person out of a burning building.

99% of women have no interest in becoming firefighters
The article was slightly ambiguous as to whether the tests were the same. They made some statements that would imply that but avoided outright saying it which made me question. As for the percentage passing, due to your other point (99% of women have no interest in becoming firefighters), it wouldn't surprise me. The women that are there are dedicated and ready to kick ass. Some of the guys will be floating along and get their ass kicked.

As for carrying people out of a building, you haven't hung out with farm girls have you? At 70, my mom could (and did) carry up to ~75 lbs by herself. She has never "worked out" but had no problem doing what is required to get a job done. She is getting older and her joints are starting to be her limiting factor.
 
The article was slightly ambiguous as to whether the tests were the same. They made some statements that would imply that but avoided outright saying it which made me question.

As for carrying people out of a building, you haven't hung out with farm girls have you? At 70, my mom could (and did) carry up to ~75 lbs by herself. She has never "worked out" but had no problem doing what is required to get a job done. She is getting older and her joints are starting to be her limiting factor.
Of course there are women who can do it but they are an exception.

In reality, the average female likely has the strength of a 10th percentile male. When you combine this with the fact that 99% of women have no interest in ever becoming a firefighter, your supply of capable woman firefighters becomes a fraction of mens.
 
The article was slightly ambiguous as to whether the tests were the same. They made some statements that would imply that but avoided outright saying it which made me question. As for the percentage passing, due to your other point (99% of women have no interest in becoming firefighters), it wouldn't surprise me. The women that are there are dedicated and ready to kick ass. Some of the guys will be floating along and get their ass kicked.

As for carrying people out of a building, you haven't hung out with farm girls have you? At 70, my mom could (and did) carry up to ~75 lbs by herself. She has never "worked out" but had no problem doing what is required to get a job done. She is getting older and her joints are starting to be her limiting factor.

My wife took an Outward Bound course decades ago. She was about 108 pounds then. She solo portaged a 75 pound aluminum canoe over a half KM of rock and boulders. She wasn't into weight training either.

Weight isn't everything. I'd rather fight a 20 pound dog than a 10 pound cat.
 
No, like the op said, if it was a Mosque or a Synagogue, things would be different.

Do we need a Christianaphobia law passed?
 
Last edited:
No, like the op said, if it was a Mosque or a Synagogue, things would be different.

Do we need a Christianaphobia law passed?
Well the good thing is we haven’t had any religious beheadings yet…only psychotic ones on a bus.
 

Back
Top Bottom