Backlash for comments

Buddy would have been better off if he watched this before he started typing **** in an inappropriate place. Hahaha
[video=youtube;F7pYHN9iC9I]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7pYHN9iC9I&feature=youtu.be[/video]
 
Buddy would have been better off if he watched this before he started typing **** in an inappropriate place. Hahaha
[video=youtube;F7pYHN9iC9I]http://www.yoube.com/watch?v=F7pYHN9iC9I&feature=youtu.be[/video]

Lol


Sent from my phone using my paws
 
Buddy would have been better off if he watched this before he started typing **** in an inappropriate place. Hahaha
[video=youtube;F7pYHN9iC9I]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7pYHN9iC9I&feature=youtu.be[/video]

That is so awesome and true that's why I rarely keep anything online except for business stuff. No personal information unless absolutely necessary.
 
Your employer can fire you anytime. You work entirely at the pleasure of your employer. Point is simply whether or not you were fired "with cause" or 'without cause." Among many differences between the two, one is how much severance the employer has to pay. Obviously the employer has to pay less if you are fired with cause.
 
Actually, it seems to be more about bottom line. His employer doesn't want to be in any way, shape or form associated with his comments. It's quite possible that those who made the decision don't give a toss about Amanda Todd or his comments - but they know perfectly well the media attention flying around this story.

Whether people feel it's overkill or not, this is the new reality with social media. If he does decide to sue, I'm curious as to how it's going to pan out.

I agree with you on that

my response was directly to the people who suggested that it was a free speech / Charter issue. Kindly read my post in the context of the post being responded to.

As to the "big" difference between being dismissed with cause or without cause ( fired doesn't mean anything ). The nature of his job wouldn't suggest a big severance package. Maybe you guys are more than a little sue happy.

Besides. at the end of the day. I think its rather ironic that he didn't learn the exact lesson taught by the Amanada Todd story, which is that you shouldn't post things you don't want public on facebook. Then he does and posts that on her memorial page. Not to say he did or didn't deserve it. I don't really have a position on the matter.

I'm not sue happy in the least. But if I were dismissed for something like this I would consider legal action just out of principle.
He's not the only one who didn't learn something. The witch who went to the trouble of finding out where he works and complaining to his employer is ironically perpetuating "e-bullying" herself.

All I'm saying is two people made a mistake and both paid for it more dearly than they deserved because a couple of mean spirited fools decided to take things too far.
 
. The witch who went to the trouble of finding out where he works and complaining to his employer is ironically perpetuating "e-bullying" herself.

Lol, what trouble? It's been awhile since I was on Facebook, but didn't she just have to click on his name FROM THE MEMORIAL PAGE HE POSTED ON, then click on his info? That doesn't seem very much trouble.
 
Back
Top Bottom