You must know different teachers than I do. It’s a tough job....
This needs an asterisk after it with a grass-is-always-greener footnote at the bottom of the post.
You must know different teachers than I do. It’s a tough job....
If you're hired at 18 by 22 you'd be promoted enough to make 100k. In reality they 'prefer' applicants to have life experience. You have a better chance of being hired at 25+.
While it's true that a degree/2nd language/visible minority/female gets your resume to the top of the pile it's certainly not a requirement.
If you're in the private sector there's a good chance you're making a wage that's competitive and commensurate with your skills. Doesn't work that way in the public sector, particularly in the big union segments.
You're right, there's little chance of big changes, entitlement roll backs get you unelected - not going to happen.
CEO's get what they are worth in the public sector. Think about it for a moment -- the head of a big bank might make $10mill a year, he's probably among the best in the biz. Drake makes more. Lebron makes more. Stamkos make more.Ahhh...so the CEOs are ok to make millions and they are worth that? Gotcha.
CEO's get what they are worth in the public sector. Think about it for a moment -- the head of a big bank might make $10mill a year, he's probably among the best in the biz. Drake makes more. Lebron makes more. Stamkos make more.
He's paid that much because he's proven to his shareholders he can make them a boatload of money and they determine he/she's worth it. If she fails, he gets the same fate as a Drake, Lebron and Stamkos -- the faucet gets turned off.
The nice think about this country is you too can become the CEO of a big company and claim your millions.
I could -- wait... I am already!I don’t think anyone is worth millions but along this line of thinking, you are also welcome to be a police officer or teacher.
This is all fine and dandy, but even if true it doesn't defend what you said earlier that I criticized:Minister Kathleen Wynne, later Premier, signed the Cabinet directive to cancel the Oakville gas plant and payout the penalties. Needing Mississauga, she did this again 1 week prior to the election (she was McGinty's campaign chair). It exposes her character and penchant for vote buying.
In 2013 Ontario's Privacy Commissioner Ann Cavoukian said "Wynne government has provided inaccurate and incomplete information in my initial investigation. As a direct consequence of the incomplete response, the public has been misled…about the ability of staff to retrieve potentially relevant information.” Her quote -- not mine. Wynne signed the deals, she had carnal knowledge, it's hard to divorce her from the scandal.
You haven't described anything that bought her any election.I think you saw her true colors, it's about her and her ideas. He 'not sorry' campaign is a feeble attempt at creating a legacy. Wynne watched Ontario jobs and businesses flee the province, she hired those people into made up gov't jobs - not sorry for that. Wynne bought the last election using the public credit card (gas plant scandal, public service union gift giving etc) - not sorry for that. Wynne borrowed the public credit card and took it on a spending adventure that will costs the province $1billion/month for the next 30 years - she is not sorry for that.
The electorate fired her and took the card.
I'll remember her for.... wait ... I just want to forget her.
Not wrong. If they hadn't settled there would have been more arbitration. A settlement meant the government owed the union money, not sure what you expected to happen other than a payout.Wrong again. As for the $31 million gift, that was after arbitration. All arbitration said was work something out -- other unions got a promise the practice will not be repeated, this union got $31mil gift or $2000/member right before an election. You figure it out.