I have to say that I got to play around with a PlayBook a few weeks back and I was actually VERY impressed. Most of the "missing features" that the reviewers seem to be bitching about are actually features that are perhaps being mis-understood. I think the playbook is actually a VERY VERY solid product and the OS that it's running seems VERY capable and smooth. If RIM can apply the same kind of quality OS to a phone I would be perfectly willing to go back to RIM and get a BlackBerry again.
I have to say that I got to play around with a PlayBook a few weeks back and I was actually VERY impressed. Most of the "missing features" that the reviewers seem to be bitching about are actually features that are perhaps being mis-understood. I think the playbook is actually a VERY VERY solid product and the OS that it's running seems VERY capable and smooth. If RIM can apply the same kind of quality OS to a phone I would be perfectly willing to go back to RIM and get a BlackBerry again.
I don't know why anybody has a home phone these days. I guess if you yap on the phone all day long or make long distance calls often it makes sense as it's probably cheaper than a cell phone.... but f' having 2 numbers and 2 phones to pay for.
It's small and nobody develops software for it. The Playbook was vapourware before it even hit the market. By now everybody in the industry knows that if you can't attract developers, you're dead in the water. This is why the iPad is a success... it's a single device with huge consumer market appeal, so developers flock to it because it's easy to build for and there's only 1 platform to develop towards. They also know that when the next iteration of the product comes out, it'll still run all their software.
Android tablets? No such luck. Every one is different and every one runs a different version of the OS. Developers don't wanna waste their time when making money in the iOS market is so much simpler.
If you want apps, you go with the iPad. If you want web/mail functionality, you go with Android.