it wont come to the app store unless they get a huge sum of money for it.
Thats impossible, thats not how the App Store works. Apple (or Android for that matter) doesnt pay ANYONE for their apps.
it wont come to the app store unless they get a huge sum of money for it.
Google tightening control of Android, insisting licensees abide by 'non-fragmentation clauses'?
A storm seems to be brewing over the realm of Android development. Bloomberg's Businessweek spies have received word from "a dozen executives working at key companies in the Android ecosystem" that Google is actively working to gain control and final say over customizations of its popular mobile OS. That might not sound unreasonable, and indeed Google's public position on the matter is that it's seeking to stabilize the platform and ensure quality control, but it does mark a major shift from where Android started -- an open source OS that was also open to manufacturers and carriers to customize as they wish. Not so anymore, we're told, as apparently Mountain View is now demanding that content partnerships and OS tweaks get the blessing of Andy Rubin before proceeding. The alternative, of course, is to not be inside Google's warm and fuzzy early access program, but then, as evidenced by the company recently withholding the Honeycomb source code, you end up far behind those among your competitors who do dance to Google's pipe.
Things have gotten so heated, in fact, that complaints have apparently been made to the US Department of Justice. They may have something to do with allegations of Google holding back Verizon handsets with Microsoft's Bing on board, ostensibly in an effort to trip up its biggest search competitor. Another major dissatisfaction expressed by those working with Android code is that Google needs an advance preview of what is being done in order to give it the green light -- which, as noted by a pair of sources familiar with Facebook's Android customization efforts, isn't sitting well with people at all. Google and Facebook are direct competitors in the online space and it's easily apparent how much one stands to gain from knowing the other's plans early. As to the non-fragmentation clauses in licenses, Andy Rubin has pointed out those have been there from the start, but it's only now that Google is really seeking to use them to establish control. The future of Android, therefore, looks to be a little less open and a little more Googlish -- for better or worse. As Nokia's Stephen Elop puts it:
"The premise of a true open software platform may be where Android started, but it's not where Android is going."
Samsung mass-producing 22-inch transparent LCD, your desktop monitor seethes with jealousy
They said they would do it, and by golly it's nearly here -- Samsung just revealed that its assembly lines are starting to churn out see-thru computer screens that don't require power-sucking backlights to function. Unfortunately, it looks like the amazing AMOLED variety is still on the drawing board, but ambient light-powered LCDs are on the way, with Samsung offering a 22-inch, 1680 x 1050 resolution panel with a 500:1 contrast ratio to begin with. Sammy suggests we'll see it in HDMI and USB-compatible monitors and suspects it'll be used in advertising and teleconferencing first -- which suggests this display won't come cheap -- but we all know the true killer app will be a nice big frameless laptop screen.
[video=youtube;HvaeYVr2aoc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HvaeYVr2aoc[/video]
[video=youtube;GsPCsW3_aUY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsPCsW3_aUY[/video]
Somehow not a single person gets hit. Surprising considering how their neighbor china has CCTV videos of the most retarded collisions ever seen.
smoke this
Heads roll at competitors as Apple continues to churn out hit products
So, Apple has revolutionized the music business, reinvented the phone and is leading the charge with its iPad. Plus, they make some computers as well. Not bad for the 35-year-old company that its co-founder Steve Jobs likes calls the world’s biggest startup. Each time Apple entered a new market, it caught its competitors on the wrong foot, leaving them perplexed and dumbfounded. Steve Ballmer who laughed off the iPhone isn’t laughing anymore.
RIM executives who thought the original iPhone was impossible in 2007 because it would have terrible battery life had found out when the device was released that it was virtually all battery plus some silicon. Nokia bosses used to point out how their day’s or week’s worth of sales matches Apple’s quarterly handset sales and now they’re going to bed with Microsoft – of all companies – to become relevant again. As of late, computer companies like Acer and smartphone vendors like Nokia and LG Electronics have seen their CEOs step down due to the Apple effect. Read on…
Struggling to keep pace with Apple’s string of smash hits, several competitors have axed their CEOs, citing their inability to come up with the right recipe to stop the Silicon Valley consumer electronics powerhouse, sources tell Digitimes.
This includes Acer’s ex-CEO and president Gianfranco Lanci, with the company pledging to “overhaul its operations” in the wake of the iPad challenge.
Nokia’s ex-CEO Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo and LG Electronics’ ex-CEO Nam Yong also stepped down in part due to the iPad’s coming out party, author Monica Chen explains:
The sources pointed out that the appearance of Apple’s iPad significantly impacted the netbook market in 2010 and messed up Acer’s lineup for the entry-level notebook market, causing the company to see almost no growth in shipments. Although Acer revealed its own tablet PC products in November 2010 aiming to grab back some market share, comparing to either iPad or Asustek’s Eee Pad, Acer’s devices are still outmatched in terms of both hardware and software.
In the smartphone world, the iPhone is instilling fear in Apple’s rivals because it’s disrupted the industry and grabbed a significant portion of the mind share, if not market share:
Since first-tier smartphone and PC brands are still unable to find an effective strategy to counter Apple’s advance with Lanci the most recent victim of Apple’s assault, the sources believe executives of brand vendors such as Motorola, Sony, Toshiba, Asustek Computer and Lenovo are all in danger of being dragged off by the wave.
Thats it.... I'm selling my bike.
.
You're a fanboy and didn't even know it.
Google 'clamps down' on world of Android partners
Alert Print Post comment Retweet Facebook
When open means all changes must be approved by Google
By Cade Metz in San Francisco • Get more from this author
Posted in Developer, 31st March 2011 19:52 GMT
On Demand Webcast : The realities of SaaS and security
Google has not only decided to keep the Android Honeycomb source code closed for the foreseeable future, preventing all but a few select partners from using the latest version of its mobile OS, it has also clamped down even harder on those select partners, telling them they can't make changes to the platform or form partnerships of their own without the approval of head Android man Andy Rubin, according to a report citing close to a dozen executives with knowledge of the situation.
The report, from Bloomberg Businessweek, says that Google has come down particularly hard on companies that wish to offer Androids devices with proprietary Google services such as Google search and Google Maps. In other words, if they don't play by Google's rules, they can't bundle such services. According to the report, Google has also tried to prevent partners from bundling rival services such as Microsoft's Bing search.
Google declined to comment on the story.
Bloomberg says that Google's clampdown affects big-name partners such as LG, Toshiba, Samsung, and – wait for it – Facebook. Previously, Facebook has denied that it's developing a phone, but apparently, it's trying to build some sort of Android device, and Bloomberg says it's a smartphone.
But the point here is that Google is playing favorites. It has always done so, but it's clear that the company has now gone several steps further. Google is demanding that Android licensees adhere to "non-fragmentation clauses" that give Google the right of refusal on changes to the Android interface, the use of services atop the platform, and, in some cases, who manufacturers and carriers can partner with. Citing two people familiar with the matter, Bloomberg says that Google has tried to hold up the release of Verizon Android devices that use Microsoft Bing.
According to Bloomberg sources, such moves have prompted antitrust complaints to the US Department of Justice.
When Google first announced that it was building Android in the fall of 2007, the company billed it as an open source operating system. But the initial version was developed entirely behind closed doors, and Google didn't open source the code until the first device was released. Subsequent updates have followed a similar pattern. Select partners are given the closed source code, and the code isn't open sourced until around the time the first devices are released.
This gives certain partners a head start on everyone else – and Google tends to choose different lead partners for each release. With the first version of Android, Qualcomm was the chip partner and HTC was the device partner. With Android Honeycomb – designed specifically for tablets – Nvidia was the chip partner and Motorola was device partner. The setup has created a situation in which these big name companies must abide by Google's rules if they want to maintain this sort of preferred status, which gives them an oh-so-valuable head start on other companies in the market. The newest phones sell the best.
But Google has additional leverage. Parts of the Android platform are not open source, including the Android Market and services such as Gmail and Google Maps. And Google retains control of the Android trademark. If you want a true Android phone, you have to play under Google's rules as well.
This past fall, Skyhook Wireless – a Boston-based outfit that offers a service for pinpointing a mobile device's location via Wi-Fi and cell-tower signals – hit Google with a pair of lawsuits, and as Skyhook CEO Ted Morgan told us recently, one of the suits shows that although Google bills Android as open, it's not.
Filed in Massachusetts state court, the suit accuses Google of using Android to force handset manufacturers into using Google's location tech rather than Skyhook's. According to the suit, Google head Android man Andy Rubin told Motorola co-CEO Sanjay Jha that if Motorola handsets did not drop Skyhook, Google would yank official Android support from the handsets.
What's more, Google has now indefinitely delayed the open sourcing of Honeycomb, preventing anyone outside a small group of partners from getting started on new devices.
Google says it this merely because Honeycomb isn't suited to phones yet. "Android 3.0, Honeycomb, was designed from the ground up for devices with larger screen sizes and improves on Android favorites such as widgets, multi-tasking, browsing, notifications, and customization," a company spokesman told us. "While we’re excited to offer these new features to Android tablets, we have more work to do before we can deliver them to other device types, including phones. Until then, we’ve decided not to release Honeycomb to open source."
But whatever the reason for delaying the open sourcing, the effect is the same: the world does not have access to the code.
What makes Google's behavior so troubling is that it has gone to great lengths to paint Android as an open platform. Last year, at the company's annual developer conference, Google vice president of engineering Vic Gundotra said that Mountain View developed Android in an effort to avoid "a Draconian future, a future where one man, one company, one device, and one carrier would be our only choice," a clear reference to Apple and Steve Job. As he spoke, an image appeared on the wall behind him that read "Not a Future We Want. 1984", re-spinning the famous Apple television ad that announced the original Macintosh.
This fall, on an Apple earnings call, Steve Jobs called Google's open talk "disingenuous", and Andy Rubin soon responded with a tweet that read:
the definition of open: "mkdir android ; cd android ; repo init -u git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git ; repo sync ; make"
The implication was that Android is open because you create a directory from a command line, download the Android source code, and build your own OS. But such posturing moves into the realm of the ridiculous when you consider Google's decision to keep Honeycomb closed.
As Bloomberg points out, Google's methods are in stark contrast to the way that, say, Microsoft handles new OS releases on the desktop. The source code is closed but it treats all partners equally. Everyone gets to release Windows machines at the same time. Who's more open? We're not going to answer that. The problem is that Google is claiming that it's far more open than everyone else, when the facts paint a very different picture. ®