jolomatic
Well-known member
Griffin: fair enough, but that would be on account of the obvously high likelyhood that you had stopped operating the motor vehicle only with the intention of avoiding the impared charge. The essential assumption beeing that you HAD been operating the motor vehicle immediately before encountering the checkpoint.
I would think that if you could prove to a judge that you had ONLY been pushing the bike (ie: the bike was inoperable), that you would win the court case.
I would think that if you could prove to a judge that you had ONLY been pushing the bike (ie: the bike was inoperable), that you would win the court case.