:happy1:Oh so I suppose you rode many supersports so you came to that conclusion?
Says in your profile you ride a 250.
S.N.A.P.
:happy1:Oh so I suppose you rode many supersports so you came to that conclusion?
Says in your profile you ride a 250.
Just make sure you go over 10k rpmOver the last 8 years I have owned 3 litre bikes, two ZX10R's and currently own a Ducati Streetfighter, so I know what I am talking about, I am not talking out of my ***.
Just make sure you go over 10k rpm
Whats dangerous about the 600 when you take it to the edge, that wouldn't be dangerous about a 250? You go too hot into a corner on either bike, as a newb, you're ****ed. The displacement makes no difference.
Whats dangerous about the 600 when you take it to the edge, that wouldn't be dangerous about a 250? You go too hot into a corner on either bike, as a newb, you're F'ed. The displacement makes no difference.
The only difference would be a hamfisted rider spinning up the rear coming out of a corner. But all that stuff is rider error and can apply on just about every bike. Its not a function of the bike, its a function of the potential idiot riding it. It's not as if you can afford to turn your brain off while riding a 250 and survive a trip on the 401.
edit: read your post again and actually I agree with what you're saying; the supersport might tempt people to go faster or try harder to find the limits of the bike... its an encouragement. but again, that's the fault of the rider, and not an inherent danger of the bike.
All bikes are dangerous when taken to their limits of course. But anyone driving to that extreme is going to be in trouble regardless of whatever bike they get. It's not like a 250 can be ridden with total lack of judgement; of course it can kill someone pretty fast too.
The difference is that someone with poor judgement or poor coordination will hve a greater margin for error on just about any bike over an SS. For several reasons...
For one, the riding position. It puts a lot of weight on the rider's arms, which is where all the important controls are. Applying both strength (to hold yourself up) and dexterity (to handle the controls) at the same time is a skill that takes practice. Heavier bikes compound this effect by requiring firmer input from the rider.
So that's number two; weight. The bike will respond sluggishly to timid steering inputs compared to a smaller bike, plus the rider will get less seat-of-the-pants feedback to his inputs on a heavier bike, so he won't learn as quickly what inputs have what effect on the bike's balance and direction. On the other hand, throttle, brake, and clutch are more sensitive to input on sportier bikes.
So the third point is the sensitivity of controls. For example it takes practice to avoid lurching the bike around over the bumps because of the sharp throttle response. Or clutch control when launching from a stop.
Another thing new riders aren't ready for is the speed at which everything starts to unfold when the bike nears it's performance zone. An experienced rider will be prepared exactly for their bike's reactions before they input any controls, his thoughts are able to keep pace with the dynamics of the bike. Nobody without powersport experience is prepared for the sheer speed at which everything unfolds when things get going, so their thoughts are way behind where the bike actually is on the road meaning they're effectively no longer in control on the bike.
What you say about the docile powerband at low RPM is true though, but for some people that very aspect of the bike will prompt them to push a little harder to find the thrill they were expecting when they bought the bike. A smaller/lighter or torquier bike will give most newbies enough thrills to assuage their need for speed (until they start to get accustomed to it and become bored). Very few will look at the pussycat powerband as a learning opportunity.
All these things can be tempered with a less performing bike, but of course the risks are never eliminated, since stupid knows no bounds.
If the gradual approach doesn't make sense, why is it so prevalent in every sport, including motorsport? You move up the ranks and you're expected to learn a little more with every step until you're ready for the big leagues. Eventually, riders learn to stop going to where the puck is and they start going to where it will be. It all has to be learned. Eventually you start envisioning entire plays in your head before they happen on the ice, and no one ever gets there all in one
Very well said
All bikes are dangerous when taken to their limits of course. But anyone driving to that extreme is going to be in trouble regardless of whatever bike they get. It's not like a 250 can be ridden with total lack of judgement; of course it can kill someone pretty fast too.
The difference is that someone with poor judgement or poor coordination will hve a greater margin for error on just about any bike over an SS. For several reasons...
For one, the riding position. It puts a lot of weight on the rider's arms, which is where all the important controls are. Applying both strength (to hold yourself up) and dexterity (to handle the controls) at the same time is a skill that takes practice. Heavier bikes compound this effect by requiring firmer input from the rider.
So that's number two; weight. The bike will respond sluggishly to timid steering inputs compared to a smaller bike, plus the rider will get less seat-of-the-pants feedback to his inputs on a heavier bike, so he won't learn as quickly what inputs have what effect on the bike's balance and direction. On the other hand, throttle, brake, and clutch are more sensitive to input on sportier bikes.
So the third point is the sensitivity of controls. For example it takes practice to avoid lurching the bike around over the bumps because of the sharp throttle response. Or clutch control when launching from a stop.
Another thing new riders aren't ready for is the speed at which everything starts to unfold when the bike nears it's performance zone. An experienced rider will be prepared exactly for their bike's reactions before they input any controls, his thoughts are able to keep pace with the dynamics of the bike. Nobody without powersport experience is prepared for the sheer speed at which everything unfolds when things get going, so their thoughts are way behind where the bike actually is on the road meaning they're effectively no longer in control on the bike.
What you say about the docile powerband at low RPM is true though, but for some people that very aspect of the bike will prompt them to push a little harder to find the thrill they were expecting when they bought the bike. A smaller/lighter or torquier bike will give most newbies enough thrills to assuage their need for speed (until they start to get accustomed to it and become bored). Very few will look at the pussycat powerband as a learning opportunity.
All these things can be tempered with a less performing bike, but of course the risks are never eliminated, since stupid knows no bounds.
If the gradual approach doesn't make sense, why is it so prevalent in every sport, including motorsport? You move up the ranks and you're expected to learn a little more with every step until you're ready for the big leagues. Eventually, riders learn to stop going to where the puck is and they start going to where it will be. It all has to be learned. Eventually you start envisioning entire plays in your head before they happen on the ice, and no one ever gets there all in one leap.
Just saying, you seem to have a lot to prove, most guys that do don't talkI have redlined all three on many occasions and continue to do so for ***** and giggles. So I don't know what you mean by go over 10K rpm?
I love my F4i, It was my starter bike.
Powerful enough that you won't grow out of it for awhile and nimble enough in the twisties.
Don't have carbs to worry about as it is fuel injected and with the right rider there isn't a 600 out there that will leave it in its dust.
I put almost 1000km's on mine in a day and felt fine, also parts are easy to get and cheap to repair.
Another choice if you can't decide between a 600 and a 1000 is a GSX-R 750?
Get what is in your price range, easy on YOUR eyes and you feel comfortable on.
And what almighty and powerful bike do you ride?
i mean i guess i should start going to dealerships and start sitting on a few... There are a list of bikes i'd love to own but one at a time i had my eye on several bikes:
1. Ducati 848/749 (v-twinss)
2. Triumph daytona 675 (but alot of ppl on the d675 forum discourage any rider including those with experience but never driven ss not to get)
3. Ktm 990 sm/ super duke
4. Ktm rc8 (my ultimate dream bike)
5. Husqvarna sms630
6. Any big 4 600
2. Triumph Daytona 675 (but alot of ppl on the D675 forum discourage ANY rider including those with experience but never driven SS not to get)
I ride a Harley Davidson Sportster 883
Just saying, you seem to have a lot to prove, most guys that do don't talk
OP, if you can actually ride in the dirt on somthing bigger than an 80 you can pick whatever bike is comfortable and looks good to you. A 1000 or twin will have more grunt though
I mean I guess I should start going to dealerships and start sitting on a few... there are a list of bikes I'd love to own but one at a time I had my eye on several bikes:
1. Ducati 848/749 (V-TWINSS)
2. Triumph Daytona 675 (but alot of ppl on the D675 forum discourage ANY rider including those with experience but never driven SS not to get)
3. KTM 990 SM/ SUPER DUKE
4. KTM RC8 (MY ULTIMATE DREAM BIKE)
5. HUSQVARNA SMS630
6. Any Big 4 600