rinomato1
Well-known member
forget triumph for a moment.. out of the big 4 which is the most "user friendly" for someone stepping from a different kind of motorcycle to an SS. because some of the machines the big 4 make aren't that bad looking.
forget triumph for a moment.. out of the big 4 which is the most "user friendly" for someone stepping from a different kind of motorcycle to an SS. because some of the machines the big 4 make aren't that bad looking.
Would you recommend me getting on the second hand side say an F4i or something? something that has the best of both worlds, I've ridden an F4i around and I found it quite comfortable
The guy owns a 600 pound Harley, ofcourse he is going to be ok with a little 600CC supersport. 600ss bikes are weak and gutless anyways, and would make a perfect beginners bike, but he is not a beginner so even a 1000 SS would be perfectly fine for him.
forget triumph for a moment.. out of the big 4 which is the most "user friendly" for someone stepping from a different kind of motorcycle to an SS. because some of the machines the big 4 make aren't that bad looking.
And what almighty and powerful bike do you ride?
The guy owns a 600 pound Harley, ofcourse he is going to be ok with a little 600CC supersport. 600ss bikes are weak and gutless anyways, and would make a perfect beginners bike, but he is not a beginner so even a 1000 SS would be perfectly fine for him.
The guy owns a 600 pound Harley, ofcourse he is going to be ok with a little 600CC supersport. 600ss bikes are weak and gutless anyways, and would make a perfect beginners bike, but he is not a beginner so even a 1000 SS would be perfectly fine for him.
If you are used to the torque of a Harley, you might want to look a V-Twin, like the KTM you mention, as an inline 4 is not going to do it for you
I don't think there's anything weak or gutless about a 600cc SS bike, and I think the statement itself is ridiculous. It's even more ridiculous to claim that a 600cc SS is a perfect beginner bike when it's very clear that it's not.
I think everything about a 600cc supersport is weak and gutless. They take forever to get going, develop a paltry 30ft-lbs of torque until you rev well past the midrange and into the top-end, by which point you're already breaking any speed limit in Ontario at the top of 1st gear.
I also don't think its ridiculous to have a 600cc SS as a first bike. The power delivery is downright docile, completely linear and un-surprising, and the gears are so tall that you're not even hitting the powerband in 1st until you're approaching highway speeds. What makes it "dangerous" to a newb? My wife started on a 600 years ago and dominated the hell out of that bike. I did too. Plenty of friends and acquaintances also started on 600 supersports without any problems at all.
This mentality that supersports are impossible-to-tame beasts and that even a paltry 600 should be deathly feared by all newbs is retarded. If you can't handle a 600 you can't handle any motorcycle and shouldn't be riding at all. I've met very few people who were clumsy and uncomfortable on their 600s, and all of them had upgraded from 250s which they were equally clumsy and uncomfortable on.
Top all this off with the OP already being an experienced rider (albeit on a cruiser, but who cares) and the argument turns ridiculous to a whole new level. The fact that this guy is actually questioning whether he's "ready" for a 600 when he's already an experienced rider just goes to show how many vocal people at these forums are so full of ****. "Ready" for a 600? :lol: gimme a break.
You're taking the performance of a 600 and lining it up against the practical limits of street riding. And you're right, anyone who rides any SS with that mindset is going to fare well. The difficulty is when riders look to experience the performance of an SS in it's entiretly, or even just get a taste of it before they've figured out all the risks and difficulties of riding in the real world. That's when things get hairy and that's why the difference between a safe and unsafe SS rider is the mindset of the rider, not the bike itself.
I think everything about a 600cc supersport is weak and gutless. They take forever to get going, develop a paltry 30ft-lbs of torque until you rev well past the midrange and into the top-end, by which point you're already breaking any speed limit in Ontario at the top of 1st gear.
I also don't think its ridiculous to have a 600cc SS as a first bike. The power delivery is downright docile, completely linear and un-surprising, and the gears are so tall that you're not even hitting the powerband in 1st until you're approaching highway speeds. What makes it "dangerous" to a newb? My wife started on a 600 years ago and dominated the hell out of that bike. I did too. Plenty of friends and acquaintances also started on 600 supersports without any problems at all.
This mentality that supersports are impossible-to-tame beasts and that even a paltry 600 should be deathly feared by all newbs is retarded. If you can't handle a 600 you can't handle any motorcycle and shouldn't be riding at all. I've met very few people who were clumsy and uncomfortable on their 600s, and all of them had upgraded from 250s which they were equally clumsy and uncomfortable on.
Top all this off with the OP already being an experienced rider (albeit on a cruiser, but who cares) and the argument turns ridiculous to a whole new level. The fact that this guy is actually questioning whether he's "ready" for a 600 when he's already an experienced rider just goes to show how many vocal people at these forums are so full of ****. "Ready" for a 600? :lol: gimme a break.
Would you really recommend a 600cc SS bike for all those people in the course as a beginner bike? Even the people who had to retake the course?
I don't think there's anything weak or gutless about a 600cc SS bike, and I think the statement itself is ridiculous. It's even more ridiculous to claim that a 600cc SS is a perfect beginner bike when it's very clear that it's not.