We need to start treating hit and run much differently. Until the penalties are an order of magnitude higher than almost any other charge, people will keep running as they have little to lose (and concurrent sentences if they get caught).
The driver who fled the scene of a collision in downtown Toronto that left a homeless man dead Tuesday morning has been located, police say.
www.cp24.com
Stiffer extreme penalties can bring on the unintended consequences of more people running and doing more damage.
There's a balancing act of the potential of getting caught, the level of punishment and the cost of doing the right thing, driving carefully.
IMO, driving on the sidewalk was either murder or DUI.
If enforcement was 100% effective, the level of punishment could be increased to any level. There is no escape. You are screwed. It's my stick a finger in a light socket analogy. It immediately hurts every time and is 100% unbiased. Even people that have never had a shock are terrified of electricity.
Can we achieve that level of enforcement? I think not.
Our next best option is better driver training. Should I have posted that in the Jokes thread?
In urban settings we need 24/7 judges that can rule on police evidence and immediately send drivers off to jail. No HTA 172 punishment without trial. Yeah, yeah, yeah legalese right to their attorney who happens to be in Fiji for a month blah, blah, blah. That brings up my decimation theory that if enough people get hammered hard the story gets out to their friends and it may scare some of them straight.
If some guy in Kapuskasing got thrown in jail it doesn't scare me as it's too far away. If my neighbour gets jailed I'm going to be more cautious.
Isn't is about time we gave some rights to the victims?
We've done it with the family reform act. The courts don't care about who cheated on who. It's all about the kids getting a chance at life in the best way possible because they are the most innocent in the mess.