Strangers taking pics...

I went a few years ago for my gf's stag and omg... i felt bad for the guys. Talk about being treated like a piece of meat!!

I was sitting quietly behaving myself and taking to the MOH and the bride was literally grabbing on everything that walked by.

Not to mention the one scary, mean and old looking chick that was sitting in the dark corner with two of the dancers on either side of her... she treated them like two little lapdogs.

I think men are a lot calmer when it comes to that scene because of the bouncer situation i think women can get away with a lot more in that environment.

yah ok :lmao:
 
I was sitting quietly behaving myself
sitting quietly behaving myself
quietly behaving myself
quietly behaving

6c6.jpg
 
It's not a safe environment for men who don't belong there. Don't hang out by the front door, you're not going to pickup when we come out.
Women in groups are more base, disgusting and just plain wrong than any group of guys I've ever met.
 
It's not a safe environment for men who don't belong there. Don't hang out by the front door, you're not going to pickup when we come out.
Women in groups are more base, disgusting and just plain wrong than any group of guys I've ever met.

Sooooooo true!!!
 
It's not a safe environment for men who don't belong there. Don't hang out by the front door, you're not going to pickup when we come out.
Women in groups are more base, disgusting and just plain wrong than any group of guys I've ever met.

You haven't hung out with a bunch of filthy medics. Take a bunch of dudes that are all very open about the human body, combine that with the army mentality, and you have a very interesting recipe for discussions... I know better than to think women are sugar, spice and everything nice.
 
lmao... this part made me laugh "then led her to the building’s basement where she was raped and later forced to perform oral sex after a second lap dance."

riiiigggghhhhhhtttt! :rolleyes:

can somebody explain to me why the accuser goes un-named? (I don't beleive I saw it in the article) I would understand if she were to have received a decision in her favour, but her claims were dismissed, yet the guy carries the accusation with his name in the public
 
can somebody explain to me why the accuser goes un-named? (I don't beleive I saw it in the article) I would understand if she were to have received a decision in her favour, but her claims were dismissed, yet the guy carries the accusation with his name in the public

Without knowing the background of the case (and I don't care to read the entire thread) it's a privacy matter. He would have been named on an information which formally charged him, that information is public record and therefore can be released. Unless they charge her, they can't arbitrarily release her name.
 
Back
Top Bottom