I do unplated "test and tune" runs down the street.
And your neighbours love you for it.I do unplated "test and tune" runs down the street.
Not really a loud pipe guy any more (maturity and all that). I think my sled pisses them off more and it's legal.And your neighbours love you for it.
I don't know if the argument holds but it was "If you and or the vehicle were not qualified to be legally on the road you wouldn't have been there for me to crash into so I can't be held responsible for your loss."We all understand that. I'm not sure it matters all that much in your scenario (other than upping the pita factor as the uninsured rider will have to fight harder to get money.)
And that's a reasonable argument for lawyers in court.I don't know if the argument holds but it was "If you and or the vehicle were not qualified to be legally on the road you wouldn't have been there for me to crash into so I can't be held responsible for your loss."
That's very serious food for thought but since it was written by an insurer it may be biased. Will it hold up in court?And that's a reasonable argument for lawyers in court.
According to an insurance company, it is clean. I don't trust statements by insurance companies. They will do anything possible not to pay (including false propaganda). I would love a court decision to reference but I suspect they will be hard to find as in the face of an impending loss, insurance would settle to keep it sealed.
Can you drive while uninsured in Ontario?
Have you let your insurance lapse? Being uninsured and driving in Ontario is not only illegal, but isn't worth the risks or the cost.isure.ca
"If you are the uninsured driver with involvement in an accident, you will be held personally responsible. This will include responsibility for all the repairs to your vehicle, as well as any medical bills. You will also be financially responsible to pay for the damages to any other vehicle(s) in the accident. This will apply even if you’re not at-fault for the collision. "
Soft. Seen plenty of 2500-3500 casesThat's very serious food for thought but since it was written by an insurer it may be biased. Will it hold up in court?
Do judges go soft on the minimum $5000 fine or are these issues absolute?