Should cyclists be subject to MTO testing and licensing?

Should cyclists be license and insured?

  • Yes, they should be since they are using the same public roads as licensed and insured drivers.

    Votes: 30 66.7%
  • No, they should bare no responsibility.

    Votes: 15 33.3%

  • Total voters
    45
I call BS. You have one post in the intro thread and six posts in this thread, including the initial one sided poll post. You never replied in any other threads, be they about cyclists or not.

IV.jpg




Prediction: gone in 60 seconds

You must be covered in BS. I hope you don't employ your predictive ability towards investing either.
So given my 6 posts as you have pointed out you seem to have missed this one (post #2):
http://www.gtamotorcycle.com/vbforu...-Speed-Limit&p=1826499&viewfull=1#post1826499


It's interesting that the current majority (75%) are in favor of this idea.
 
Last edited:
I think the word "employ" fits the context much better than "implore"....but what the hell do I know?

Back on topic:
I dunno about cyclists, but I wish E-Bikers were tested and licenced, as I watch them ride along, helmetless, two-up or more, ride on road, then when they don't wanna stop at a red light, they retreat to the sidwalk, zip across the crosswalk, then rejoin the road again. It seems they need not heed any rules at all. I feel like driving over them.
 
I think the word "employ" fits the context much better than "implore"....but what the hell do I know?

Back on topic:
I dunno about cyclists, but I wish E-Bikers were tested and licenced, as I watch them ride along, helmetless, two-up or more, ride on road, then when they don't wanna stop at a red light, they retreat to the sidwalk, zip across the crosswalk, then rejoin the road again. It seems they need not heed any rules at all. I feel like driving over them.

Thanks, my auto correct filled it in when I was fixing the spelling. I am glad to see you were able to comprehend the rest of the information and not get stuck on one word.
 
I call BS. You have one post in the intro thread and six posts in this thread, including the initial one sided poll post. You never replied in any other threads, be they about cyclists or not.

IV.jpg




Prediction: gone in 60 seconds

Busted .... LOL
 
Thanks, my auto correct filled it in when I was fixing the spelling. I am glad to see you were able to comprehend the rest of the information and not get stuck on one word.


I believe it would make more sense if you had to get a licence if you constantly were doing something wrong on the road. no point in making the people with common sense be forced to get a licence if they know how to drive.
 
where can someone vote for "stupidly worded poll negates results"?

put me down for that choice. . .

Make that 2 votes

While there is merit in an intellegent discussion of the subject, this one started off with erroneous comments followed by misunderstandings.

The best way to start a troll is to make an erroneous inflamatory statement and wait for the ever expanding over-reactions and over-reactions to the over-reactions. Stir the pot every once in a while with grammer comments so the post floats to the top.
 
Make that 2 votes

While there is merit in an intellegent discussion of the subject, this one started off with erroneous comments followed by misunderstandings.

The best way to start a troll is to make an erroneous inflamatory statement and wait for the ever expanding over-reactions and over-reactions to the over-reactions. Stir the pot every once in a while with grammer comments so the post floats to the top.

Ah. Just another fine day at GTAM.

:cool:
 
Your statement seems to be contradictory.
How so?

I would not have created a poll if I did not want people to provide their input.
What you did was create a poll with biased answers to provide validation for your opinion. Neither of your options reflect my opinion, for example.[/quote]

I would like YOUR response to question #2
As with anything else the person responsible for the damages is responsible for restitution, obviously. Why?
 
The road were paved because of cyclists, thank one of the next time you see us pedaling away.
 
I missed the signup part outlining your requirements for posting.

Thanks for the welcome.

I think I waited more than 1 post before I turned into a complete *******.
 
Yeah let’s get the government regulate cycling too because government intervention in everything has done well before /Sarcasm.
Another socialist idea.

Stupid ****** Idea.
 
Yeah let’s get the government regulate cycling too because government intervention in everything has done well before /Sarcasm.
Another socialist idea.

Stupid ****** Idea.

Please explain how different it would be if the MTO regulated bicycles vs. how they currently regulate motorcycles?
It would ensure that everyone using the public roads understand the rules and regulations.
 
Back
Top Bottom