Yes and no. Bellmedia could also be accused of homogenising their content to the point of absurd blandness instead of letting people make interesting things. Look at the absolute debacle they made of taking over CityTV, turning it from an interesting and very local outlet offering something nobody else could, into the beigest of beige corporate pablum that nobody could bear watching.
There's lots of evidence that the death of so-called 'linear' programming is very overstated. Radio is a good example, where studies show people are still very happy to have something they can just turn on and listen, without having to futz around to download a podcast or pick an artist to stream. This is especially true if you can offer local content that's actually relevant to people, instead of some cost-cut and AI programmed 'feed' with interchangeable so-called DJ's simply filling a few seconds between algorithmically selected songs. There's lots of evidence that people like linear TV, too, and the streamers are all moving to offer shows with set release times etc. The fact that there are buyers for all these radio stations that supposedly can't be profitable says a lot.
The problem is more that Bellmedia are run by a bunch of MBA idiots who treat the entertainment business exactly the same as running a widget factory, and then blame external factors when they fail spectacularly. They happily took millions in government subsidies (for which the idiot feds deserve equal blame for handing over a blank cheque with what appears to be zero conditions), rake in billions in profit over our excessive internet and mobile plans, but refuse to offer anything of benefit to the general public. All the Canadian telecom and media conglomerates are disgusting, but Bell is especially so. Everything they touch on the media side has been made worse, never better.