Oh, and I use four fingers. I wouldn't want to pinch a couple of fingers under the lever, and lose out on some braking potential, after the weight has shifted forward. Those with shorty levers can do it different.
Oh, and I use four fingers. I wouldn't want to pinch a couple of fingers under the lever, and lose out on some braking potential, after the weight has shifted forward. Those with shorty levers can do it different.
For street riding, I like to ride conservatively enough to only use the back brake + engine braking 95% of the time. I treat my front brake like an emergency brake for when I absolutely have to stop way shorter than I originally thought I would, like coming up to a light that changes unexpectedly or when someone cuts me off or whatever. I just find that if I use the weak brake gives me a lot more "oh ****" room than if I am already braking at 90% of what the bike can give me.
Oh, and I use four fingers. I wouldn't want to pinch a couple of fingers under the lever, and lose out on some braking potential, after the weight has shifted forward. Those with shorty levers can do it different.
25 years of riding never had a problem yet, probably will keep doing it my way.
Found some video of someone who took the advice to only use your front brake:
My point being there are examples of people ****ing up using front brake, just as there are videos of people ****ing up using back brake. As long as both wheels are touching the road who cares how you get it done?
Originally Posted by PrivatePilot![]()
![]()
This! "Only 30% of braking effort from the rear wheel", some say, so why bother.
Sure...but using both together gives you 30% more braking! Use both together..practice until it's second nature, then in a panic situation it won't be something you'll have to think of, so instead of crashing while only using 70% of your bikes stopping ability (front brakes only) you may avoid the crash by using all 100% of it.
Well, I disagree with you completely.
If a sport bike is at maximum stopping ability, the rear gets extremely light and will start to lift. If it gives me more than 3% (not the 30% you mentioned) braking ability I would be extremely surprised.
I use my front brakes for the bulk of my stopping power, but I do also use the rear at the same time, even if only enough to have my foot resting on the pedal. And trust me, having practiced emergency stops on my bike, not using the rear brake dramatically lengthens my stopping distance - I can haul down fast using threshold braking on both wheels, but if I mash the front only the bike just squats, feels unstable, and of course takes a lot farther to get stopped.
For me it was always one or two fingers and just the front brake, I never used the rear brake at all.
I didn't see any gravel there, but I did see was rider error brought on by a blind corner tightening, which caught him off guard. .
It was an excuse, remember street riders never make mistakes, it's always gravel or someone else.The video description itself directly on YouTube attributed it to gravel, and it makes sense - he goes down right at intersection of what appears to be a gravel driveway or road. He certainly didn't appear to be into the brakes anywhere near hard enough to lock the front IMHO nor did he appear to hang a peg into the ashphalt or anything.
Hand brake is used to stop the bike from wheeling out of a corner, has nothing to do with slowing the bikeJust because Schwantz didn't use a rear brake doesnt mean he didn't know how.
I can link you to articles about MOTOGP teams spending big money developing new rear brake tech including hand actuated ones for their riders to use...
There's NO argument. The brake allows for direct control over the rear wheel and suspension. If you don't know how to use it you're lacking a vital skill. Period.
My point being there are examples of people ****ing up using front brake, just as there are videos of people ****ing up using back brake. As long as both wheels are touching the road who cares how you get it done?