So are harleys
Why you gotta do him like that
Isn't the Bmw GS 1200 one of the best adventure bikes? It would have to be pretty reliable for that reputation.
So are harleys
I think this is in the eye of the beholder. Big GS are notorious for the number of issues rider face over very small distances - you will find lots electrical, corrosion, leaks, other mechanical issues. Buyers don't often whine about their new bikes, a year or two in they start complaining. If you want to get a clearer picture, drop by any Motorad dealer in the spring... there will be plenty of shocked customers willing to share their stories.Why you gotta do him like that
Isn't the Bmw GS 1200 one of the best adventure bikes? It would have to be pretty reliable for that reputation.
Pretty much anything made in the last 15-20 years by a mainstream manufacturer is going to be pretty good. There isn’t a lot of junk being manufactured these days. I think it’s mostly non owners that spread a lot of the noise about failures and issues./QUOTE]
But...But...But….THE INTERNET FORUMS!!
I'm with you 100%. I recently sold my KTM 990 SMT to a long-time rider from Ottawa area. Chatting about the bike prior to selling I told him it was mechanically stone-stock. No blocking-off this, no screwing about with that, I figured the team of engineers that developed the bike knew more than some dude hacking around in his garage and posting on the forums. He paid more for mine because it was stock and properly maintained than a similar one that was "farkled" with.
A few years ago I had a 1987 BMW K100RS that I owned (from new) for 18 years and wouldn't hesitate to ride it coast to coast today.
So are harleys
No they aren't.
Pointless trivia. Obviously BMW and HD owners have CAA coverage while most Yamaha and Honda riders do not.
By all means, go ahead.
If I really wanted a classic(expensive) bike with a lot of history, I would def go triumph over HD, nothing personal, I just like triumphs