Ontario Budet Talks 2017 Lane Splitting | Page 3 | GTAMotorcycle.com

Ontario Budet Talks 2017 Lane Splitting

There is NO way that rider should have ever gotten hit. Had he/she been attentive, they had PLENTY of escape options, left tons of room to the front to escape, simply didn't watch their mirrors and when they heard squealing tires turned around rather than get out of the way.

As for the discussed topic, could care less if lane filtering or splitting were made legal wouldn't affect how I would ride, (wouldn't do it), don't care if someone else does it, (once it it legalized), as long as they accept the increased insurance premiums that our GREAT insurers are surely to pass along with the legalization of it.

I find most "arguments" for "safety reasons" IE lane splitting/filtering, loud pipes, et al, can be over come or dramatically decreased by rider better ability. A rider who is a competent and skilled rider, generally can avoid "most" issues where those things develop into being an issue.

Average human reaction time when driving = 1.5 secs
Time from squealing tires and impact = 1.5 secs

It's rather difficult to determine whether a person is going to stop behind you or not and not likely that you can get out of the way in time when someone is coming at you full speed, but the hearing the tires squealing argument is not one.

Please tell me again how the rider shouldn't have gotten hit.
 
So insightful! I have to ask, why didn't you just duck or swerve when that bird crossed your path; plenty of options for competent riders...

Yeah I'm being facetious and a bit of an *******, but seriously.

Exactly... everyone's reaction and vision is 20/20... until a moment of not paying attention causes them to miss where the squealing brakes are coming from... or where a bird is coming from.

I've hit birds before on the road... and have very nearly been rear ended. Filtering at the very least should be legal for safety reasons. And this safety reason isn't ********.
 
In fact, according to this study: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/811366

12.2% percent of crashes at intersections are into stopped vehicles... i.e. rear ended, which to motorcyclists means serious injury or death. One of the only higher percentages is 22% for left turn accidents.

If we can decrease our chances of being rear ended by filtering, it should be legal and we should be doing it.
 
So insightful! I have to ask, why didn't you just duck or swerve when that bird crossed your path; plenty of options for competent riders...

Yeah I'm being facetious and a bit of an *******, but seriously.

LOL ..... Priceless catch. Did that really happened? If so talk about monster irony.

I just find it hilarious how the local motorcycle enthusiasts of GTAM will verbally fight against lane splitting. It sounds almost as bad as a union worker rejecting a better deal with longer paid vacations .... I bet the same guys who say they never speed, ever.
 
I can see why even some bikers may not embrace splitting but I would think everyone would be on board with filtering.
 

Back
Top Bottom