Ahh, the old "if I have to wear protective equipment, it must not be safe" argument.
No, that's not the argument.
If you really feel that way, then feel free to give up riding.
Now you're just trying to look dumb.
Last edited:
Ahh, the old "if I have to wear protective equipment, it must not be safe" argument.
If you really feel that way, then feel free to give up riding.
even with that, i'm still against speed limit laws and drunk driving laws. just another thing that the government has to put its nose in.. speeding/drunk driving laws or no laws, i won't go 100kph thru a school zone at 3:15pm impaired, but it's my choice.
Just another candidate for the Darwin Award!! I'd vote for him.
No, that's not the argument.
Now you're just trying to look dumb.
We're too far gone now. So many safety labels and regulations have been put in place that at this point half the world's population would disappear very quickly if it was all taken away.
Pardon me?!? Is that the way you respond to an argument? With name calling? Besides I was discussing with Paul his feeling that riding was dangerous. What does that have to do with you?
Paul was replying to a post about one person being affected by someone else's "poor decision". He gave an example of a guy who thinks that riding motorcycles is a poor decision (link to a previous post with the corresponding article). This is the real problem here, i.e. to what extent people can decide things for themselves in the society, and to which degree the society can impose limits on the behaviour of an individual.
As far as his post makes a lot of sense, yours makes none.