The other day I was talking with my brother-in-law about motorcycles. He was a racer in his younger days and did the circuit (semi-pro I believe). We were discussing my new Versys and what a difference it is from my Tiger 955i, different in a very positive way for me, though less HP and cc's.
Out of his mouth came the words that no-one needs a bike larger than 600 / 650 unless you are racing. Having a litre bike is a waste on the streets, and a waste of money. That is not what they were designed for. Fast forward to this morning when I was talking with Tony at Blue Streak, and he mostly agreed with the sentiment. Yes there are instances where a bigger bike may be warranted (extensive touring), but for the typical rider, a 600/650 is more than enough bike.
I have to admit I agree with both my BIL and Tony, though I am sure many on here will vehemently disagree.
Out of his mouth came the words that no-one needs a bike larger than 600 / 650 unless you are racing. Having a litre bike is a waste on the streets, and a waste of money. That is not what they were designed for. Fast forward to this morning when I was talking with Tony at Blue Streak, and he mostly agreed with the sentiment. Yes there are instances where a bigger bike may be warranted (extensive touring), but for the typical rider, a 600/650 is more than enough bike.
I have to admit I agree with both my BIL and Tony, though I am sure many on here will vehemently disagree.