Marriage appeal?

Sorry, I am getting married ;)

Why is it that when a girl teases but don't go forward with action they call themselves cock tease

But when a man does the same they are called "all talk but no action"

You need help, let me suggest:
QMRUn.jpg
 
You need help, let me suggest:
QMRUn.jpg

Ohhhhh, it hurts, lmao! Congrats on the upcoming wedding zx600, don't listen to that ******** about "make sure you don't go to bed angry" only thing that will leave you is awake and angry! Also night before wedding bachelor parties are brutal, spent night and morning of pukin out organs! Once you put on that ring you'll see what I mean about women coming out the woodwork!
 
You need not worry about these things ZX, you are getting married! One woman for the rest of your life :) :D


you forgot, Again.

Not his first rodeo.
 
I've started some stupid threads but this one beats any of mine.

Any woman who hits on a married man has some insecurities to face and vice-versa. It's disgusting, pathetic display to get an ego boost. It goes both ways.
 
If the wife is still with you, then you have some credibility with other women as not being a total <your favorite derogatory word here>!
 
If the wife is still with you, then you have some credibility with other women as not being a total <TURBODISH>!
...
 
its humourous and another testament to how most women are walking contradictions because they almost all state they don't want a player/cheater/unfaithful man at the top of their grocery list...
 
Any woman who hits on a married man has some insecurities to face and vice-versa. It's disgusting, pathetic display to get an ego boost. It goes both ways.

I couldn't agree more, it just seems to me that telling someone your married nowadays don't carry the same weight it used to, in fact it now seems to be a selling point to some people. I got a buddy I hadnt seen in a while tell me two days ago his wife took his kids and left him, for his best friend!! What kind of shite is that. Red is right, some bitches do be crazy. I don't care if my buddy beat her WITH one of the kids a man don't deserve that from his supposed "best friend"
 
A bit of a tangent but I think to some degree the whole "when I'm single there is no opportunities but when I'm taken there is tons" is MOSTLY all in your head.

When I'm single it seems like there is no chicks to date or bang but in reality there is a lot of chicks I'm flirting with, texting with, going on dates with, etc. The problem is that I pursue those opportunities and they all lead to dead ends (chick is psycho, a flake, not that interested, etc.) and I find out at the end of the day, that I don't have any REAL leads.

When you're in a relationship though you notice those same "leads"....chick flirting with you at a club, chicks checking you out in public, that coworker eyeing you like a piece of meat, etc. but you are taken so you CANNOT pursue those opportunities to see where they lead. The truth is, that most of these would be dead ends just like when you're single but you will never know so they all look like missed opportunities at first glance.

Just my 2 cents.
 

Is this a legit question? I don't waste my time. Just like there are lot's of women out there that are a disappointment to you men there are even more men out there that are a disappointment to us women. Men are always after women so they talk a good game to snag them, then they can't follow through. If women were just won over mainly by appearance like men are, it would be easier. But we will take a pass on looks for other things like personality and intelligence. Makes the pickings more slim. It's easy to be pretty.

Either you two are among the 1% or you're both full of ****. Laws of probability suggest it's the latter.

Women want a fairy tale that doesn't exist. They want their Hollywood love story and will keep their blinders on in pursuit of it. I've been guilty of having my blinders on but it's the opposite, I have had tunnel vision and missed other opportunities because I was so focused on another. Women are the opposite, they will miss what's right in front of them because they're waiting for a guy that doesn't exist.

That fairy tale has two parts. Passionate and companionate. The passionate part comes first, the so called "honeymoon stage" of the relationship. That inevitably fades and the only way for a relationship to remain solid is for a strong companionate connection. Unfortunately the two stages have nothing to do with each other. A good passionate stage in no way indicates whether or not the companionate stage will be as strong. This is why girls date d-bags. They're strong and aggressive and take charge, but in the end they don't have what is needed to be best friends with their partner. Those men are a disappointment because once the honeymoon stage fades there is no strong friendship (because it becomes evident that they're d-bags).

My views on love are different than most, and they have repeatedly got me into trouble. I am looking for a girl to be my best friend, not just my girlfriend/wife/whatever..... then i get 'friend zoned'. You call it a waste of time, I consider it getting to know them a bit before I decide if there is any potential for a companionate connection.

In closing.

nice-guys-friend-zone.jpg
 
Last edited:
"You call it a waste of time, I consider it getting to know them a bit before I decide if there is any potential for a companionate connection."

I agree with this 100%.

There are plenty of physically attractive girls, one thats beautiful on the inside... tougher, and its way better to find that out earlier.
 
Back
Top Bottom