And if there had have been a collision you would have been deemed at fault.
Sure about that?
And if there had have been a collision you would have been deemed at fault.
The HTA explicitly states that you have to make a right turn into the right lane of the road that you are entering, left5 turn into the left lane of the road that you are entering, unless there are multiple turn lanes. I now see perhaps as much as 90% of drivers make illegal turns. This is not only a dangerous practise, but it also serves to slow traffic for no good reason. It's one of the things that I think needs serious enforcement.
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90h08_e.htm#BK215
I have heard, however, that driving schools are even teaching this patently illegal practise.
I would agree about the 90%. That's my rough estimate as well.
At Goreway and Queen, there is a double turning lane coming south. Queen is 3 lanes here, and coming north I have a yield into the third right-most lane. I can't tell you how many times a transport truck will honk at me when I make that right because they want to turn into the third lane.
(I am, of course, assuming that I have yielded to oncoming traffic because that truck should be turning into the second *middle* lane, at their advanced green)
You're turning right on a red. RTFH. It doesn't matter how many lanes the vehicle turning left on an advanced green is using.
Yes, it does, because there is the possibility that oncoming traffic will be making a right turn into a lane that should legally be free of traffic at that time. Please see the link that I posted, to the appropriate section of the HTA.
Transports are a bit of a different issue but they should make every effort to minimize the amount of lane space they use.
Sure about that?
Are there exceptions to the laws for transport trucks?
Yes, it does, because there is the possibility that oncoming traffic will be making a right turn into a lane that should legally be free of traffic at that time. Please see the link that I posted, to the appropriate section of the HTA.
Transports are a bit of a different issue but they should make every effort to minimize the amount of lane space they use.
On a related note....I keep hearing about the 401 being the busiest highway in North America etc. That may be so but my observations have been that traffic would actually flow really quite freely if lane discipline was observed, it doesn't seem busier than say the M25 in the UK.
Look at point five of the section you posted. Lefts weren't supposed to be made at the same time as rights.
One might be turning right at the driveway through the intersection.
he problem is that everyone is in a hurry, they make poor lane choices, and then break the first rule of driving.
Yes, it does, because there is the possibility that oncoming traffic will be making a right turn into a lane that should legally be free of traffic at that time. Please see the link that I posted, to the appropriate section of the HTA.
Transports are a bit of a different issue but they should make every effort to minimize the amount of lane space they use.
Transports can be maneuverable but yeah I'd give them some slack.
http://www.wimp.com/truckboss/
One additional problem is that one bad driver sets the pattern forcing others to follow. I often make a left at a particular intersection and then after a short block, make a right. If I turn left lane to left lane the A-holes behind me, taking the same route go left to right lane, a wider path and therefore a faster track, and they plug the right lane forcing me to do a cut off. Of course I could out accelerate them and risk a HTA 172.
Transports can be maneuverable but yeah I'd give them some slack.
http://www.wimp.com/truckboss/
One additional problem is that one bad driver sets the pattern forcing others to follow. I often make a left at a particular intersection and then after a short block, make a right. If I turn left lane to left lane the A-holes behind me, taking the same route go left to right lane, a wider path and therefore a faster track, and they plug the right lane forcing me to do a cut off. Of course I could out accelerate them and risk a HTA 172.
To piggy back on this topic; I am noticing a lot more in the last year or two that drivers will make sudden lane changes to advance themselves 1 or 2 cars ahead when approaching a red light.
I've even seen people do it when they are completely stopped. The lane beside them has 1 car waiting at a light, the lane they are in has 3 cars, they'll make a sharp turn to become car #2 in the lane next to them, instead of being car #4 in their original lane.
Incorrect. They can be made at the same time, if everyone is obeying the law and there are multiple lanes. Where things fall apart is where people are ignorant of the law, flout the law, or just don't give a good goddamn about anyone but themselves.
The lane beside them has 1 car waiting at a light, the lane they are in has 3 cars, they'll make a sharp turn to become car #2 in the lane next to them, instead of being car #4 in their original lane.
Can you post where it actually says that they can be made at the same time?
I'm guessing it doesn't and some people are assuming yes and some no.
The two philosophies collide where the velocities intersect.
I've had one close call and that's enough for me.
I like to be ahead or behind unless there's more than two lanes.
Plus, in the city the right lane is usually full of parked cars.
If there's a collision, chances are you could both be cited, and found liable.
To piggy back on this topic; I am noticing a lot more in the last year or two that drivers will make sudden lane changes to advance themselves 1 or 2 cars ahead when approaching a red light.
I see it done, and am guilty of it myself at times as well. But usually when there is no one in said lane as they ventured into left or right turn lanes.
What blows my mind is when they cut drivers off to do it.
And when they jump in front of a tractor trailer at a stop light-- they know trucks need more room and can crush them like a bug, right?