Thought this was against the civil rights of Canadians
Police departments are functionally immune from getting in trouble. How many scandals has the RCMP been a part of and they just swap a staff member or two and continue on? Law enforcement in Canada needs many grenades. Starting from scratch would be far better than trying to fix a system that is rotten to the core (and overpriced and underperforming).Thought this was against the civil rights of Canadians
FIFYPolice departments are functionally immune from getting in trouble. How many scandals has the RCMP been a part of and they just promote a staff member or two and continue on? Law enforcement in Canada needs many grenades. Starting from scratch would be far better than trying to fix a system that is rotten to the core (and overpriced and underperforming).
If you haven't watched his recent video about being threatened (again) with a lawsuit by a SovCit, it's well worth the time.I don't know if we've had this linked here before. Ian Runkle (canadian lawyer) with a good video on police discipline and what changes he thinks should happen to clean up the stink.
'Suspended with pay' is a slap in the face to any good office, the public, the taxpayer, and goes against everything the badge should stand for.I don't know if we've had this linked here before. Ian Runkle (canadian lawyer) with a good video on police discipline and what changes he thinks should happen to clean up the stink.
That is every job in the world other than police officer or politician.In my job...if they so much as get a whiff of conflict of interest (even if it's just perceived) then I'm getting a call from HR, and very possibly kicked out the door WITH NO PAY.
If you know there are laws (even dumb ones) and choose to break them, sometimes that costs you. They could have chosen not to travel. They chose to do what they wanted and relied on religion to protect them. Not a whole lot different than sovereign citizens in this instance in my mind.this is criminal
![]()
Ontario court upholds $20K ArriveCan fines for Amish families
Several Amish families in Ontario are facing $20,000 in COVID-related fines for violating the Quarantine Act after an Ontario court denied their application to reopen the tickets. The families were represented by The Democracy Fund and are part of the group's larger effort to defend over 30 Amishtruenorthwire.com
'Suspended with pay' is a slap in the face to any good office, the public, the taxpayer, and goes against everything the badge should stand for.
If I had the power, the officer's pay would be put into a trust, and if they're found guilty then they get zero. If they get found not-guilty...then they get their full pay with any interest earned.
'But how about living without a salary for all that time?'
Well maybe...don't do things at work that end up with you getting suspended, investigated, and potentially charged.
In my job...if they so much as get a whiff of conflict of interest (even if it's just perceived) then I'm getting a call from HR, and very possibly kicked out the door WITH NO PAY.
While I agree to a point. The flip side of it is that there are officers that go for years, are found guilty, and yet effectively had a paid vacation.Here's the thing though... You either have innocent until PROVEN guilty for EVERYONE or no one.
'Seen MANY cases of guys getting suspended (with pay) and in the end it's determined they did nothing wrong.
Add to that the occasional malicious persecution/suspensions launched by shady and corrupt "leadership"
Y'think its right those guys have their pay cut off on the basis of an accusation..?
Recently had a fellow exonorated after a two year suspension over what turned out to be a made up /BS complaint over something that never happened.
Innocent until proven guilty is a criminal court concept. It has nothing to do with employment. Every other employer uses balance of probability to determine consequences. If it is more likely than not the offence was committed, fired and feel free to sue if you think we got it wrong. The root of the problem is police do not deal with employment issues until after the entire criminal trial is exhausted. That is insane. I agree that a complaint alone shouldn't result in suspension without pay. It should trigger a rapid investigation and PSB hearing on whether continued employment is reasonable. Many cops are on paid vacation with many witnesses and evidence of them committing actual crimes. As it is now, they just go on vacation for years and resign seconds before the axe drops.Here's the thing though... You either have innocent until PROVEN guilty for EVERYONE or no one.
'Seen MANY cases of guys getting suspended (with pay) and in the end it's determined they did nothing wrong.
Add to that the occasional malicious persecution/suspensions launched by shady and corrupt "leadership"
Y'think its right those guys have their pay cut off on the basis of an accusation..?
Recently had a fellow exonorated after a two year suspension over what turned out to be a made up /BS complaint over something that never happened.
I'm not saying change it overnight. Psa needs to change first. Then collective agreements need to be modified to comply with the law. As it sits, it is probably the worst possible system for everyone except the criminals in blue.Another reality is, wether you like it or not here are often collective agreements in place and contracts to be adhered to.
Every other employer isn't the government, which has the duty to try someone charged with a crime.Innocent until proven guilty is a criminal court concept. It has nothing to do with employment. Every other employer uses balance of probability to determine consequences. If it is more likely than not the offence was committed, fired and feel free to sue if you think we got it wrong. The root of the problem is police do not deal with employment issues until after the entire criminal trial is exhausted. That is insane. I agree that a complaint alone shouldn't result in suspension without pay. It should trigger a rapid investigation and PSB hearing on whether continued employment is reasonable. Many cops are on paid vacation with many witnesses and evidence of them committing actual crimes. As it is now, they just go on vacation for years and resign seconds before the axe drops.
Cops are not much different than metrolinx, Healthcare, teachers and every other person that works for government through a subsidiary. That argument should apply to all or none. Again, I am talking about employment not criminal culpability. The bar for employment is far lower and is not at all affected by who prosecuted criminal charges.Every other employer isn't the government, which has the duty to try someone charged with a crime.
this is criminal
![]()
Ontario court upholds $20K ArriveCan fines for Amish families
Several Amish families in Ontario are facing $20,000 in COVID-related fines for violating the Quarantine Act after an Ontario court denied their application to reopen the tickets. The families were represented by The Democracy Fund and are part of the group's larger effort to defend over 30 Amishtruenorthwire.com
If you know there are laws (even dumb ones) and choose to break them, sometimes that costs you. They could have chosen not to travel. They chose to do what they wanted and relied on religion to protect them. Not a whole lot different than sovereign citizens in this instance in my mind.
I was pretty specific in my qualifier, which doesn't apply to those other groups.Cops are not much different than metrolinx, Healthcare, teachers and every other person that works for government through a subsidiary. That argument should apply to all or none. Again, I am talking about employment not criminal culpability. The bar for employment is far lower and is not at all affected by who prosecuted criminal charges.