iPad 3 just released

Like any Apple thread, it has devolved into a fanboy vs fanboy argument, right on time

And like all Apple threads, less than 10% of the users actually know jack **** about the differences between operating systems!

But hey, Apple did a great job, to sum up acceptable stupidity levels for usage, it would go in this order:

Any Apple OS <-- You can be demented and still use it.
Windows <-- Retards can still use it
Linux gui based distributions <-- You have to actually have some degree of logic
Linux bash/korn/whatever shells or Windows DOS <-- You have to have logic
IBM iSeries/Unix <-- Math is your major
 
油井緋色;1742540 said:
And like all Apple threads, less than 10% of the users actually know jack **** about the differences between operating systems!

But hey, Apple did a great job, to sum up acceptable stupidity levels for usage, it would go in this order:

Any Apple OS <-- You can be demented and still use it.
Windows <-- Retards can still use it
Linux gui based distributions <-- You have to actually have some degree of logic
Linux bash/korn/whatever shells or Windows DOS <-- You have to have logic
IBM iSeries/Unix <-- Math is your major

What's "Windows DOS"? Must be some new-fangled super-OS I've never heard of.


The non-sense you just listed has nothing to do with users having "logic" in order to be able to use the operating systems. It only has to do with familiarity and knowledge of the inner workings of those operating systems. Mac OS is entirely based on Unix and at its core is a hugely flexible and complex system. The GUI which Apple laid over it is cleverly designed and simple to use, but that doesn't mean the guts of the system aren't powerful. Windows is a bloated joke in comparison; from file system and up. You don't need "logic" to use Linux or Unix... you need knowledge.


Methinks you don't actually have a clue what you're talking about. You should get a Mac ;)
 
油井緋色;1742540 said:
And like all Apple threads, less than 10% of the users actually know jack **** about the differences between operating systems!

But hey, Apple did a great job, to sum up acceptable stupidity levels for usage, it would go in this order:

Any Apple OS <-- You can be demented and still use it.
Windows <-- Retards can still use it
Linux gui based distributions <-- You have to actually have some degree of logic
Linux bash/korn/whatever shells or Windows DOS <-- You have to have logic
IBM iSeries/Unix <-- Math is your major

Perhaps I'm ignorant, but I fail to see your point. Are you implying that the harder the OS is to use, the smarter it's user is? Or the easier the OS is to use, the smarter it's design? Personally, I'm a fan of the latter

PS, on my Mac I have OS-X Lion, Windows 7, Backtrack Linux distro, and SSH into an ArchLinux Pogoplug. Do I win a prize?
 
WOW you MUST be a math major... cuz you know, you need MATH to be able to use Unix & stuff!
 
Perhaps I'm ignorant, but I fail to see your point. Are you implying that the harder the OS is to use, the smarter it's user is? Or the easier the OS is to use, the smarter it's design? Personally, I'm a fan of the latter

PS, on my Mac I have OS-X Lion, Windows 7, Backtrack Linux distro, and SSH into an ArchLinux Pogoplug. Do I win a prize?

The average population is incredibly stupid when it comes to computers or math. The proof behind this is that they "dumbed down" calculus in high school because it was apparently the hardest subject and causing students to fail...now instead they're failing in first year uni calculus!

The further up the chain of "dummy proof" operating systems, the more of the population it attracts. Remember when formatting a computer and installing an operating system wasn't hitting ENTER over and over again?

Oh, and btw mmmnaked, if you knew anything about operating systems and their purposes you would understand that 99% of the time iSeries and Unix are implementations for mainframes. No one works with UNIX or IBM operating systems unless they're from computer science, business or math background.

And no, I'm not a math major and I don't know jack **** about the iSeries or UNIX OS. I only used them for a month or two to play with assembly.

Apple penetrated the market, just like World of Warcraft did, by making "user friendly" design choices...and that means removing (or hiding) control that the user has on less user friendly OSs.

EDIT: I'm gonna leave my typo up there as Windows DOS to piss other ppl off.
 
Last edited:
油井緋色;1742577 said:
And no, I'm not a math major and I don't know jack **** about the iSeries or UNIX OS. I only used them for a month or two to play with assembly.

YOU DON'T SAY!!! :lol: I never would've guessed it.

I still wanna know what math has to do with knowing how to use an operating system... that's comedy gold right there. I often found myself needing to solve complicated mathematical equations when working with Linux servers :lol:
 
YOU DON'T SAY!!! :lol: I never would've guessed it.

I still wanna know what math has to do with knowing how to use an operating system... that's comedy gold right there. I often found myself needing to solve complicated mathematical equations when working with Linux servers :lol:

Ask yourself this: what were the IBM and UNIX operating systems built for? And who uses them?
 
Awww **** someone quickly solve A^x + B^y = C^z I NEED TO EMPTY MY RECYCLE BIN!
 
油井緋色;1742577 said:
The average population is incredibly stupid when it comes to computers or math. The proof behind this is that they "dumbed down" calculus in high school because it was apparently the hardest subject and causing students to fail...now instead they're failing in first year uni calculus!

The further up the chain of "dummy proof" operating systems, the more of the population it attracts. Remember when formatting a computer and installing an operating system wasn't hitting ENTER over and over again?

Oh, and btw mmmnaked, if you knew anything about operating systems and their purposes you would understand that 99% of the time iSeries and Unix are implementations for mainframes. No one works with UNIX or IBM operating systems unless they're from computer science, business or math background.

And no, I'm not a math major and I don't know jack **** about the iSeries or UNIX OS. I only used them for a month or two to play with assembly.

Apple penetrated the market, just like World of Warcraft did, by making "user friendly" design choices...and that means removing (or hiding) control that the user has on less user friendly OSs.

EDIT: I'm gonna leave my typo up there as Windows DOS to piss other ppl off.

I is confused, so making computers easier to use and more accessible is a problem now? I'd throw my computer out the window if my only option was Dos or a Linux shell.
 
Fight fight

fight

fight



perhaps i'm ignorant, but i fail to see your point. Are you implying that the harder the os is to use, the smarter it's user is? Or the easier the os is to use, the smarter it's design? Personally, i'm a fan of the latter

ps, on my mac i have os-x lion, windows 7, backtrack linux distro, and ssh into an archlinux pogoplug. Do i win a prize?
 
can't remember the last time I had to solve any differential equations when trying to use a computer OS, what's going on in this thread?
 
They should've just stopped at the original iPhone and boarded up their doors and windows. It makes no sense to ever release updated products.

btw did you guys hear that all the bike manufacturers are selling 2012 models now??? WTF, we just HAD 2011 MODELS LAST YEAR. JEEEZUS. When will this crazy conspiracy end!!!!!

cool post.

how about this one below....

Apple has announced in a press release that they have sold three million 'new iPads' since its launch Friday.

---
CUPERTINO, California―March 19, 2012―Apple® today announced it has sold three million of its incredible new iPad®, since its launch on Friday, March 16. The new iPad features a stunning new Retina™ display, Apple's new A5X chip with quad-core graphics, a 5 megapixel iSight® camera with advanced optics for capturing amazing photos and 1080p HD video, and still delivers the same all-day 10 hour battery life* while remaining amazingly thin and light. iPad Wi-Fi + 4G supports ultrafast 4G LTE networks in the US and Canada, and fast networks around the world including those based on HSPA+ and DC-HSDPA.**

"The new iPad is a blockbuster with three million sold―the strongest iPad launch yet," said Philip Schiller, Apple's senior vice president of Worldwide Marketing. "Customers are loving the incredible new features of iPad, including the stunning Retina display, and we can't wait to get it into the hands of even more customers around the world this Friday."

The new iPad is already available in the US, Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Japan, Puerto Rico, Singapore, Switzerland, UK and the US Virgin Islands and will be available in 24 more countries starting at 8:00 a.m. local time on Friday, March 23 through the Apple Online Store (www.apple.com), Apple's retail stores and select Apple Authorized Resellers, including Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Macau, Mexico, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden.

The new iPad Wi-Fi models are available in black or white for a suggested retail price of $499 (US) for the 16GB model, $599 (US) for the 32GB model, $699 (US) for the 64GB model. iPad Wi-Fi + 4G for either AT&T or Verizon is available for a suggested retail price of $629 (US) for the 16GB model, $729 (US) for the 32GB model and $829 (US) for the 64GB model. iPad is sold in the US through the Apple Online Store (www.apple.com), Apple's retail stores and select Apple Authorized Resellers. Additionally, the incredible iPad 2 is now offered at a more affordable price of $399 (US) for the 16GB Wi-Fi model and just $529 (US) for the 16GB Wi-Fi + 3G model.
 
Its good to see that Mr Cook grew some cojones and finally offered dividends to stockholders. Something Jobs would have shot down.
 
i see some talk about OS's.....OSX will be getting a new OS in the summer of 2012(OSX Lion july 2011).
Some really cool additions incoming.


Windows 7 Oct 2009, with a late 2012 release set for windows 8.

Vista Jan 2007..... XP Oct 2001.
 
[h=1][/h][h=1]New iPad’s Retina Display Reduces Eye Strain, Expert Says[/h]
retina-display-pete-600-275x171.jpg
We’ve seen how the new iPad‘s ultra-high-resolution retina display can improve the visibility of type and images, making the whole experience of interacting with the tablet more pleasing. But can it also ease the inherent strain that goes hand-in-hand with staring at a glowing screen, sometimes for hours on end?
Gary Heiting, an optometrist and associate editor of the site All About Vision, says yes.
“A key factor in something that’s called computer vision syndrome, or just eye strain from computer use, is screen resolution,” Heiting says. “The new iPad, with twice the resolution of the iPad 2, 264 ppi (pixels per inch) instead of 132, people are going to notice less pixelation, especially in a small typeface. It’s not just an enjoyment issue or an aesthetic issue, but it’s definitely a visual comfort isue, over time.”
Why is screen resolution such a key factor? It ties back into the whole rationale for creating a retina display in the first place, which is loosely described as a screen so sharp that it becomes impossible for a normal person to resolve individual pixels when it’s held at normal viewing distances. As Heiting describes it, the closer you can get the screen resolution to be similar to the human eye itself, the better it’s going to be in terms of visual comfort.
SEE ALSO: Is a Retina Screen on the iPad Overkill?We all use our iPad’s differently, however, with some using it mainly as an book and news reader, others as a video hub and some as a gaming device (among many other uses). Heiting says reading is where users will get experience the most comfort benefit.
“For the typical user, it’s really going to be more about [type],” he says. “That’s going to put the greatest demand on their vision.”
The iPad’s retina display would also ease some of the eye strain of playing games, says Heiting. Since games aren’t static like photos, they put more stress on the eye. Although the dynamic nature of games will always fatigue eyes faster than type, the upgraded screen can still help.
“When you’ve got movement going, that’s a whole new level of neurology involved in vision,” Heiting says. “So the greater clarity, the greater color saturation for gaming should make the new iPad significantly more comfortable on people’s eyes than the previous models.”
The term “retina display” first arrived with the iPhone 4. At the time, some experts claimed Apple was exaggerating in its claims that the screen was more dense than the human eye could see. Now that the retina tent is expanding, it’s worth asking: Is it fair to call the new iPad’s screen a retina display?
SEE ALSO: Here’s How Apple Put a Retina Display in the iPadHeiting explains that it all depends on how close you hold the device to your eye. At typical distances — 12 inches for a smartphone, 15-17 inches for a tablet — Apple’s claims are true. If you hold your device closer, however, you may be able to see pixels. But he says you wouldn’t want to do that anyway.
“The closer you hold things to your eyes, not only the more your eyes have to focus, but the more they have to converge inwards. So it’s more stressful on your eyes, and your eyes are going to tire a lot quicker.”
At the normal distances for tablets, the human eye’s resolving power is about 240 ppi, which makes the new iPad’s 264 ppi a true retina display. He adds one caveat, though: That holds only for people with normal 20/20 vision.
“There are a lot of people who are capable of seeing more — people with, say, 20/10 vision,” Heiting adds. “That’s twice as good as what’s considered normal. If you wanted to cover those people, you may want to be around the 400 mark for ppi. Is that really going to be noticeable to 80-90% of people? Probably not.”
Do you find that you experience more eye strain on lower-res devices? And is it at all a factor in the gadgets you buy? Let us know in the comments.

[h=2]BONUS: The New iPad’s Retina Display Close Up[/h]
[h=1]9. Non-Retina App, Google Currents
[/h]Google hasn't yet updated its Currents news reader for the retina display, but as you can see here the type still benefits greatly from the extra pixels.




[h=1]9 Stunning Examples of the New iPad's Retina Display[/h]
currents.jpg


http://mashable.com/2012/03/19/ipad...ashable)#544019-NonRetina-App-Google-Currents
 
screen-shot-2012-03-19-at-1-42-06-pm.png
 
i see some talk about OS's.....OSX will be getting a new OS in the summer of 2012(OSX Lion july 2011).
Some really cool additions incoming.


Windows 7 Oct 2009, with a late 2012 release set for windows 8.

Vista Jan 2007..... XP Oct 2001.

You are right, but Apple likes to do small revisions year by year, where Microsoft does a complete redesign (at least on the surface) of Windows. Just different ways to approach updating your product
 
Back
Top Bottom