Interview with Harper - Debt Crisis imminent | Page 3 | GTAMotorcycle.com

Interview with Harper - Debt Crisis imminent

Status
Not open for further replies.
That specifically excludes the donations to him and his extended family and anything that he does to benefit his trust fund holdings and . . .
when you get every single expense you can think of paid for by tax payer money $175k a year is a pretty nice salary, his vacations alone cost us over 10x his yearly salary
 
I look at this way. The liberals take your money. The conservatives take your freedom. I can always get more money.

And remember: No matter who you vote for the government always gets in.
What? The Liberals take both.

Conservatives try to give back what liberals took before them.
 
Ahh Mike you weren't watching Harper very close. Were you not following my "Campaign of Shame" letter writing.
 
this is an interesting source if you have some time to kill
see how the Cons actually intend to deal with policy
up/down votes on policy issues from the paid membership


a few eye openers:

Pre-Born Child Protection, exactly what it sounds like, the claim of pro-choice is rubbish
they will attempt an abortion ban if they form a government
approved by the membership

Women: includes a pay equity clause
voted down with insufficient grass roots support, fok women!

Family: The Conservative Party believes that the family unit is essential to the well-being of individuals and society, because that is where children learn values and develop a sense of responsibility----I'm good with that, but then we see this:

Parents have the right to counsel children about sexuality and body-affirming issues. We do not support criminalizing the actions or conversations of parents who seek counselling on these topics. We do not support the use of hormone therapies, puberty blockers or surgery for treatment of gender dysphoria for minor children.

so they are all for Pray the Gay Away
but will criminalize parents accepting their kids gender dysphoria

these Western ******** want to legislate the way people live
 
Pray the gay away! you can't make this stuff up
 
this is an interesting source if you have some time to kill
see how the Cons actually intend to deal with policy
up/down votes on policy issues from the paid membership


a few eye openers:

Pre-Born Child Protection, exactly what it sounds like, the claim of pro-choice is rubbish
they will attempt an abortion ban if they form a government
approved by the membership

Women: includes a pay equity clause
voted down with insufficient grass roots support, fok women!

Family: The Conservative Party believes that the family unit is essential to the well-being of individuals and society, because that is where children learn values and develop a sense of responsibility----I'm good with that, but then we see this:

Parents have the right to counsel children about sexuality and body-affirming issues. We do not support criminalizing the actions or conversations of parents who seek counselling on these topics. We do not support the use of hormone therapies, puberty blockers or surgery for treatment of gender dysphoria for minor children.

so they are all for Pray the Gay Away
but will criminalize parents accepting their kids gender dysphoria

these Western ******** want to legislate the way people live
we should give puberty blockers to individuals who still haven't mastered wiping their ass, and who think eating tide pods is entertainment?
 
we should give puberty blockers to individuals who still haven't mastered wiping their ass, and who think eating tide pods is entertainment?

what do you mean we? if it's not your kid, you have no say what happens with them, none of your business

of course there needs to be extensive mental and medical consultation to determine what's best for the person
I see no role for government in determining the outcome of that

that's a better answer than you deserved for that comment
 
if it's not your kid, you should have no say what happens with them

of course there needs to be extensive mental and medical consultation to determine what's best for the person
I see no role for government in determining the outcome of that

that's a better answer than you deserved for that comment
how magnanimous of you lol

I would agree with extensive medical and mental consultation, but I would argue that waiting until the frontal lobe is fully developed might be a good idea
 
what do you mean we? if it's not your kid, you have no say what happens with them, none of your business

figure of speech, might be time to switch to decaf ;-)
 
regulations based on medical science are a good idea
that's not what the party faithful are voting
they have voted for an outright ban with zero understanding of the individual
and they do not have the qualifications to make that determination

neither do you, but I see you want to regulate the life of others based on your personal opinions
 
time to stay out of threads with old idiots that can't think
but figure they know it all, too many of you here
 
regulations based on medical science are a good idea
that's not what the party faithful are voting
they have voted for an outright ban with zero understanding of the individual
and they do not have the qualifications to make that determination

neither do you, but I see you want to regulate the life of others based on your personal opinions
now you're just getting upset and making **** up, I never said I want to regulate the life of others based on my personal opinions. I pointed out that if they have to be 18 to vote, lets at least make them wait that long before to decide they "need" hormone blockers. If they decide they still need them after they are at least old enough to buy tobacco, booze and pot, then have at it. or maybe you think we should get rid of those regulations as well?
 
time to stay out of threads with old idiots that can't think
but figure they know it all, too many of you here
bye, Felicia
 
It's all history. Trudeau is going to get re-elected, that is very clear. Canadians aren't smart enough to understand what a debt crisis is.
 
how magnanimous of you lol

I would agree with extensive medical and mental consultation, but I would argue that waiting until the frontal lobe is fully developed might be a good idea


I'd argue to let them decide themselves.

The government can try to force all the acceptance they want, but we all know this poor boy dug their own grave lol

EDIT: Damnit, **** got removed. Was a video of a 13~ year old boy, dressed like a girl, enacting a TikTok video of a girl dancing, and someone in the class screaming "BRO WHY!" at the very end.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom