That specifically excludes the donations to him and his extended family and anything that he does to benefit his trust fund holdings and . . .$175k, does that include the "donations" from SNC Lavalin?
That specifically excludes the donations to him and his extended family and anything that he does to benefit his trust fund holdings and . . .$175k, does that include the "donations" from SNC Lavalin?
when you get every single expense you can think of paid for by tax payer money $175k a year is a pretty nice salary, his vacations alone cost us over 10x his yearly salaryThat specifically excludes the donations to him and his extended family and anything that he does to benefit his trust fund holdings and . . .
What? The Liberals take both.I look at this way. The liberals take your money. The conservatives take your freedom. I can always get more money.
And remember: No matter who you vote for the government always gets in.
we should give puberty blockers to individuals who still haven't mastered wiping their ass, and who think eating tide pods is entertainment?this is an interesting source if you have some time to kill
see how the Cons actually intend to deal with policy
up/down votes on policy issues from the paid membership
Forums | Final Policy Submissions
ideas-lab.ca
a few eye openers:
Pre-Born Child Protection, exactly what it sounds like, the claim of pro-choice is rubbish
they will attempt an abortion ban if they form a government
approved by the membership
Women: includes a pay equity clause
voted down with insufficient grass roots support, fok women!
Family: The Conservative Party believes that the family unit is essential to the well-being of individuals and society, because that is where children learn values and develop a sense of responsibility----I'm good with that, but then we see this:
Parents have the right to counsel children about sexuality and body-affirming issues. We do not support criminalizing the actions or conversations of parents who seek counselling on these topics. We do not support the use of hormone therapies, puberty blockers or surgery for treatment of gender dysphoria for minor children.
so they are all for Pray the Gay Away
but will criminalize parents accepting their kids gender dysphoria
these Western ******** want to legislate the way people live
we should give puberty blockers to individuals who still haven't mastered wiping their ass, and who think eating tide pods is entertainment?
how magnanimous of you lolif it's not your kid, you should have no say what happens with them
of course there needs to be extensive mental and medical consultation to determine what's best for the person
I see no role for government in determining the outcome of that
that's a better answer than you deserved for that comment
what do you mean we? if it's not your kid, you have no say what happens with them, none of your business
now you're just getting upset and making **** up, I never said I want to regulate the life of others based on my personal opinions. I pointed out that if they have to be 18 to vote, lets at least make them wait that long before to decide they "need" hormone blockers. If they decide they still need them after they are at least old enough to buy tobacco, booze and pot, then have at it. or maybe you think we should get rid of those regulations as well?regulations based on medical science are a good idea
that's not what the party faithful are voting
they have voted for an outright ban with zero understanding of the individual
and they do not have the qualifications to make that determination
neither do you, but I see you want to regulate the life of others based on your personal opinions
bye, Feliciatime to stay out of threads with old idiots that can't think
but figure they know it all, too many of you here
how magnanimous of you lol
I would agree with extensive medical and mental consultation, but I would argue that waiting until the frontal lobe is fully developed might be a good idea