Ice fisherman billed for rescue

Status
Not open for further replies.

klr_guy

Well-known member
Site Supporter
Generated quite a few comments for and against. Curious how GTAM will view things.

http://www.durhamregion.com/news/article/1572870--shwa5

pre-emptive tl;dr - warnings are given that ice is not safe, guy goes ice fishing, tries to head back to his truck at 7pm and goes through the ice, 911 is called


SCUGOG -- An Oshawa man says Scugog's decision to bill him nearly $5,400 after firefighters pulled him from Lake Scugog sets a worrisome precedent that could have deadly consequences.An avid angler with more than 30 years' experience fishing on Lake Scugog, Neil Robbescheuten trekked his way out to a patch of ice just north of Scugog Island on the afternoon of Jan. 13 in hopes of catching a few fish.
Instead, he landed himself a bill for $5,392.78 from the Scugog Fire Department after he became disoriented on the ice after a thick fog rolled in and called for help after getting stuck in mud while trying to make it ashore.
"The precedent this sets is huge," said Mr. Robbescheuten, who received the bill Jan. 23. "Scugog council needs funding, they have fiscal challenges, but to try and recoup money from 911 services is dead wrong."
The Oshawa angler says he knows of no other municipalities that charge for rescues requested through 911 calls and says that Scugog's decision to bill for services is "a huge change" in 911 protocol that could have grave consequences.
Specifically, he's concerned that someone needing help may not call 911, worried about the cost of emergency services, or they may waste precious minutes while they consider whether they can afford the help of first responders.
"What happens to a poor person or a young person who hesitates to call or they don't want to call 911 because of their fear of billing?" asked Mr. Robbescheuten, 62. "The ramifications of this could be huge."
For years, Scugog councillors have grumbled about the costs and dangers associated with rescuing boaters, anglers and snowmobile enthusiasts from the local lake.
The Township, however, has been handcuffed by provincial privacy laws which prohibit the municipality from using personal information -- such as names and addresses -- garnered from a police report for billing purposes.
Last fall, Scugog Fire Chief Richard Miller told councillors he would ask his firefighters to try to collect personal information from anyone rescued, specifically so that Scugog could try to recoup some of its costs.
"When you're on the lake and you call 911 and we come and rescue you, you should expect a bill for fees and services as council has directed the fire department (to send)," said Chief Miller on Monday.
Mr. Robbescheuten "was in a position where he recognized he shouldn't be in" and was charged accordingly under Scugog's bylaws, said the fire chief.
As for the Oshawa man's assertions that Scugog is changing 911 protocols, Chief Miller stressed: "He's giving (the public) that perception, not us."
Mr. Robbescheuten, however, contends that he did nothing wrong on Jan. 13.
It was a unseasonably mild day and he wandered about 130 yards from the northern tip of Scugog Island for his fourth trip of the 2013 ice-fishing season. At one point, the former Durham school principal called his wife and three friends to remark about the wonderful weather as he fished on ice about five inches thick.
"It was a perfect day," said Mr. Robbescheuten, who was wearing a survival suit that afternoon.
As twilight neared, a thick fog began to roll into the area, covering the shoreline and the lake. Mr. Robbescheuten decided to give the fog some time to dissipate, but finally chose to try to make his way ashore around 7 p.m.
"It was a blanket of fog like I've never experienced before," said Mr. Robbescheuten, who could only see about four feet ahead with his Coleman lantern. "I had no idea where I was going, the fog was so dense."
Pulling a sleigh with all his ice-fishing gear, he realized he was wandering off-course but thought his luck changed when he spotted some weeds and bullrushes.
As he walked towards a marshy area just west of the Crozier Lane boat launch, where he left his truck, Mr. Robbescheuten suddenly went through the ice -- first his left leg, then his right.
He didn't sink very deep, but he did end up knee-deep in mud, his lantern extinguished by an unexpected drop into water.
Mr. Robbescheuten tried his best to get out of the mud, pulling on bullrushes and rolling on the ice, but couldn't budge his boots from Lake Scugog's mucky bottom.
"I thought I had a bear trap on my feet. I thought those were my last moments there," he said, noting he sprained a ligament in one of his legs from all the attempts to get out of the mud.
Finally acknowledging his predicament, Mr. Robbescheuten called two of his friends for help but realized they'd probably end up stuck like him. Reluctantly, he called 911.
"I was not in grave danger, I just wanted someone to show me the direction back to shore so I could get back to my truck," said Mr. Robbescheuten.
A 911 operator stayed on the line with Mr. Robbescheuten for more than 20 minutes as Scugog firefighters made their way to him. He was then helped from the mud and dragged to shore in a zodiac boat.
"And now all of a sudden I'm sent a bill for $5,400 is unbelievable, it's unbelievable," said Mr. Robbescheuten, who stressed he has no intentions of paying the invoice.
Instead, he says he will appear before Scugog councillors at the March 4 municipal committees meeting to outline his concerns.
"I cannot pay this bill. I will not pay it on principle," he said.
 
I understand that emergency services are often underfunded and are forced to levy user fees, but if it gets up to this level... I'll definitely think twice before calling 911 or letting anyone call them, for that matter. What's next? Fees for police response?
 
If billing for rescue becomes the new norm, the 911 dispatcher should inform the caller about the fee before sending help. The same way when dispensing cash from an ATM that is not from your bank, it warns you of the surcharge before you agree to take the money.
 
Interesting. Of course it has to be $5400.00. It couldn't be $100 hr. per man or something reasonable. It's like a million bucks to fly security vehicles to India. Always padded to the max.

I don't understand how he felt he was not in grave danger. He was still stuck when the rescuers came. How long would he survive stuck in the mud and ice? Why down play the danger now? Because he doesn't want to pay? Odd.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't pay either. It doesn't cost $5,400 to help a dude out of the muck, I don't care how they try to justify it. You also don't render services before agreeing on payment, that's just silly. I'd pay for their gas and maybe a bit on top for their trouble but no more.
 
If billing for rescue becomes the new norm, the 911 dispatcher should inform the caller about the fee before sending help. The same way when dispensing cash from an ATM that is not from your bank, it warns you of the surcharge before you agree to take the money.

I agree!

I always thought those services were free.
Don't our taxes pay for these things? I thought I see it somewhere in the tax break-down
 
Warnings were given that it wasn't safe and he still went ahead with his fishing, that in my opinion was careless on his end and he should pay for his stupidity, perhaps next time he'll use his head a little.
 
As I come across stories like this I get more and more enraged.
What the hell are we paying taxes for?

sent from my wondrous contraption
 
As I come across stories like this I get more and more enraged.
What the hell are we paying taxes for?

sent from my wondrous contraption

The argument I've heard used is that your taxes pay for your municipality. Only bill I got from getting hurt in Richmond Hill was a $50 (I think) ambulance fee. Supposedly it's ok to be billed the second you cross the town/city/whatever's borders for everything else. The BIG costs seem to be the Fire Department. Frankly, they shouldn't be responding unless something's on fire if they're going to charge citizens for it. Police are trained in emergency first aid and ambulances come quick enough.
 
You pay your taxes for "emergency services",someone knowinglly ventures out when warnings are given and gets into trouble is not an "emergency". The other problem is when this crews are out getting this guy out of trouble, what happens if a real emergency comes up and they cannot repsond? If people want lower taxes and live in a "Ford Nation", then this is what kind of charges to expect.



As I come across stories like this I get more and more enraged.
What the hell are we paying taxes for?

sent from my wondrous contraption
 
Watching the news the other day, a guy's hood flew open on the QEW so he safely pulled over to the shoulder. A passing motorist sees it, calls 911, 2 firetrucks rush to the scene. Couple of weeks later an invoice arrives in the mail for $800 for emergency services he didn't even call for in the first place!

http://chch.com/home/item/11436-911-bill
 
Last edited:
Warnings were given that it wasn't safe and he still went ahead with his fishing, that in my opinion was careless on his end and he should pay for his stupidity, perhaps next time he'll use his head a little.

I completely agree. People who ignore warnings and then place others in danger just to rescue their sorry *** should have to pay. Hopefully this will send a clear message to others to think before they venture out onto the ice when it is unsafe. BTW, this is not new as many ski areas have been charging for rescues of those who intentionally venture into closed areas.
 
People who ignore warnings and then place others in danger just to rescue their sorry *** should have to pay.

True, but it creates the potential for someone to delay calling 911 for fear of the cost. It does set a dangerous precedent.
 
I completely agree. People who ignore warnings and then place others in danger just to rescue their sorry *** should have to pay. Hopefully this will send a clear message to others to think before they venture out onto the ice when it is unsafe. BTW, this is not new as many ski areas have been charging for rescues of those who intentionally venture into closed areas.

Motorcycles are dangerous, Track days are dangerous. Are we ignoring those warnings?
 
This case has been discussed over on a fishing forum for a little while now. It's the general feeling there that the ice was known to be unsafe and he had no business out there to start with. Anyone going on the ice that day knew they were taking a risk. He should have not gone out that day.

However, we all pay for emergency services in our taxes. If you should require services outside of the municipality in which you pay your taxes, your municipality should cover that cost. This will never happen since emergency services can and will bill a person more than another city that would actually know how much those services should cost.
 
This case has been discussed over on a fishing forum for a little while now. It's the general feeling there that the ice was known to be unsafe and he had no business out there to start with. Anyone going on the ice that day knew they were taking a risk. He should have not gone out that day.

That makes sense. I have to wonder how much of that $5400.00 was punitive then. Or was it just outrageuosly inflated because, well, that's just the way it's done. I hope next time I hit a guardrail and sail into a ravine they cut me a deal because it didn't happen on purpose.
 
They should send him the latest Best Buy flyer with the GPS units on sale that week circled with a high-liter along with the next bill.
 
That makes sense. I have to wonder how much of that $5400.00 was punitive then. Or was it just outrageuosly inflated because, well, that's just the way it's done. I hope next time I hit a guardrail and sail into a ravine they cut me a deal because it didn't happen on purpose.

I feel if they are billing $5400, then the actual cost of services rendered would be closer to $1500. This is why its more lucrative to bill the individual.
 
no GPS?, they are $99 bucks and he's a retired principle ( lets not start on teachers as idiots)
unsafe ice warnings, idiot
ice fishing to start with? idiot

But I would like to see the cost breakdowns, the fire dept didnt buy the shiney truck with empties they collected. The Zodiac they used wasn't donated and the fireman get paid when they are working or having dinner, its not like they get paid more when they get into the truck is it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom