The Star was running an article about how the parents of kids are buying the houses for them or giving them giant down payments. I believe it.
Then there are all the foreigners with their vast wealth buying at the ask price, sometimes sight unseen.
Renting isn't really an answer either. It can be but also not. Why? Because on my mortgage that I'm overextended on, at least when I sell I'll get my principal payments back. Renters get **** all except what they say they saved in the difference.
It sucks. Yes it is cheaper to live outside Toronto. You also pay more in tax ($6000 a year in Brooklin, Whitby where partner's parents live) and more to commute. Go just raised fares 35-55 cents a ride beginning Feb so that's an extra $300 a year for people commuting from the end of the line. Last year was also a fare increase. My pay increase for the coming year as of Jan 1 is $200. So techically I am now $100.00 poorer at the end of next year. You get the picture. It sucks.
Ahhh the good old "rent is a waste of money argument", i knew this was going to come up sooner or later.
Lets break it down, 2995 monthly mortgage payment, of which btw 30% is interest, or 900 dollars roughly.
Add in property tax of 350 a month and other bills which on the conservative side will be another 350 (hydro etc) we'll leave maintenance out of it just to make it easy.
So right there you wasted 1,600 a month in money you will never see again. For the exact same price you can rent a 2 bedroom plus den condo at square one, with everything included.
Take the initial down payment, invest it and throw in the difference into the bank every month of what you'd be paying towards the house.
At the end of it who do you think will be better off? I can run the math for you, but there are several ways this can go and there are a lot of variables that all have to line up in your favor, like interest rates, inflation, will homes go up or will they finally take a **** at some point in the next 25 years? You still got a couple of furnaces, acs, roofs, and other things to get for your house over the next 25 years. None of these things are cheap.
BTW in order for you to break even on a 600,000 house in my scenario your house will need to be worth somewhere in the 1,800,000 - 2,000,000 range in 25 years.
Given 3% inflation ofcourse.
Considering all of the above, if everything works out you might be able to break even or be a bit ahead of the game. However, if things go south, it aint gonna be pretty.
So is sinking 25 years of your money, well actually borrowed money, into one thing the best idea?