So whats the dealio with front to rear linked braking systems? How would that factor into this discussion? Do they compromise emergency braking?
So whats the dealio with front to rear linked braking systems? How would that factor into this discussion? Do they compromise emergency braking?
Brakes are only linked when ABS is present, so that the rear can't be locked even while the rider focuses solely on applying brakes at the lever (which is exactly what people are proposing as a basic riding principle).
So there isn't 0% braking at the rear? Very interesting.
Well said.
But, like most things with motorcycles, your common sense or use of physics will not dissuade anyone from their beliefs. Once someone has some idea lodged in their head, you will not get it out. As an example I've spent way too much time trying to convince some cruiser riders that their front brake won't kill them and that "laying 'er down" isn't a braking technique, it's crashing to avoid crashing.
Unfortunately, some noobs will have gleaned from this thread that they need to balance their braking inputs during emergency braking and wiill either not brake as quickly as they could or will lock their rear with the resulting consequences of that. Oh well...
so you are saying that you ride with or know cruisers that prefer to use the rear and actually stay away from the fronts?
What's wrong with that ?
In MSF, we were practicing emergency braking on a rainy day, and I was constantly locking the rear on the CBR125. When I swapped the bikes and got on the cruiser, I was then locking the front all the time.
well read the last few post and find out.
ofcourse on a rainy day you should use the rears but aside from bad road grip conditions and u turns and parking lot manuvers , you stick to the fronts
Dude, all you read on this thread is based under the assumption of a sports bike or at most a regular motorcycle, and def not for the cruisers. That's a whole different chapter.
you are wrong. infact with the less steep rake angle in a cruiser you can get on the fronts in a more comfy manner.
i have a sports and a cruiser. fronts are the best for both
so you are saying that you ride with or know cruisers that prefer to use the rear and actually stay away from the fronts?
Quote Originally Posted by MacDoc View Post
Simply put, all those links are wrong. The simple fact is that the fastest way to come to a stop when there is enough grip to perform a stoppie, is with 0% rear brake.Read the link I sent.
Riding Skills Series: The Basics of Hard Braking
We hooked up our Stalker radar gun and the laptop computer and set out to solve the big braking question: What is the optimum braking procedure, and how do you do it?
.....
For our final test, we modulated both the front and rear brakes simultaneously. Not surprisingly, we brought the motorcycle to a stop in the shortest distance of the three tests: 146 feet. Both brakes together undoubtedly provides the best braking performance.
Read more: http://www.sportrider.com/riding_tips/146_9510_the_basics_of_hard_braking/viewall.html#ixzz2If1ymRKp
so you are saying that you ride with or know cruisers that prefer to use the rear and actually stay away from the fronts?
I sea whut you done their...I try and avoid breaks when riding prefer to stay in one piece. But sometimes I do like to take a break and get a coffee.
No one I ride with, no. People I've talked with, particularly new cruiser riders, have said they've been told by their "experienced" friends that the front brake is a hazard and should not be used. They are also advised to lay the bike down to avoid a collision (which is insane, but there ya go).