My understanding here, and I could be off... Bank forecloses (owner stopped paying/default), bank tries to sell the property (power of sale) for what they can. If it sells for more than they are owed (I am sure there are fees of course...) they give the delta back to the previous owner, if less the previous owner is on the hook but at that point they have likely declared bankruptcy so the bank is screwed. Of course why would the bank try hard to maximize value (over what is owing) in the sale unless it will sell for less than they are owed. If the property was worth well over market value a smart person would sell instead of defaulting....
On a side note... During the US financial crisis some banks were paying extra cash to the underwater defaulters to not trash the place to protect value. Until the bank takes possession it is your house and you can do whatever (within reason)... it is not like the person did not know they were losing the house. So they were trashing the place or smart ones were selling as much off as they can (cabinets. appliances, copper....) and when the bank took possession it was at a big loss due to the damage.
Canadian Banks are ok with this, in fact it’s a payday for them. Most of their risk is insured.
Banks love volatility, when any market is going wild, whether up or down, banks have the resources to reap incredible profits during turmoil. Just look at the last 2 years.
During real estate crashes banks increase lending margins, tighten credit availability, and buy a lot of discounted debt from small lenders.
cockroaches could learn a thing or two about surviving and thriving from Canadian banks.
Canadian Banks are ok with this, in fact it’s a payday for them. Most of their risk is insured.
Banks love volatility, when any market is going wild, whether up or down, banks have the resources to reap incredible profits during turmoil. Just look at the last 2 years.
During real estate crashes banks increase lending margins, tighten credit availability, and buy a lot of discounted debt from small lenders.
cockroaches could learn a thing or two about surviving and thriving from Canadian banks.
So the bank passes the hit onto an insurer. If the insurer is an insurance company they increase the prices on their other products to make up the loss.
BTW. I expect to see life insurance policies to have some fine print added to cover their arses re epidemics, failure to mitigate (Vaccinate) etc
So the bank passes the hit onto an insurer. If the insurer is an insurance company they increase the prices on their other products to make up the loss.
BTW. I expect to see life insurance policies to have some fine print added to cover their arses re epidemics, failure to mitigate (Vaccinate) etc
The good old CDIC, Canadian Deposit Insurance Corporation. Guaranteeing up to $100,000 per account in case the bank fails. Note the Canadian government owns the Corporation but as it is a corporation, the owner doesn't have to cover its debts if it fails. If there is a massive bank meltdown the CIDC can't cover it all and the owner doesn't have to cough up for the shortfall.
CIDC invests the money and if investments fail at the same time there will be another toilet paper shortage.
Older than most here, I grew up thinking Canada would stand on guard for me as well. That has changed. If you look at the gist of this thread, it come out that Canada has allowed big money and foreign influence to wipe out, in one generation, the concept of being rewarded for hard work and diligence.
The good old CDIC, Canadian Deposit Insurance Corporation. Guaranteeing up to $100,000 per account in case the bank fails. Note the Canadian government owns the Corporation but as it is a corporation, the owner doesn't have to cover its debts if it fails. If there is a massive bank meltdown the CIDC can't cover it all and the owner doesn't have to cough up for the shortfall.
CIDC invests the money and if investments fail at the same time there will be another toilet paper shortage.
Older than most here, I grew up thinking Canada would stand on guard for me as well. That has changed. If you look at the gist of this thread, it come out that Canada has allowed big money and foreign influence to wipe out, in one generation, the concept of being rewarded for hard work and diligence.
I was more referring to CMHC and banks offering lower rates if you have less equity as they can't possibly lose money as gov't (ie. taxpayers) will foot the bill.
That goes back to my argument of smaller dwellings to allow cheaper rent. I never rented anywhere with more than one bathroom. My first house would only have had one but my wife dug her heels in at 1.5 minimum so that's what we got.
That goes back to my argument of smaller dwellings to allow cheaper rent. I never rented anywhere with more than one bathroom. My first house would only have had one but my wife did her heels in at 1.5 minimum so that's what we got.
I'm trying to see if this makes sense but the numbers don't work in my favour. I'm only saving ~$2,000/year and I am downgrading into a shoe-sized apartment. $2,000/year extra for double the space and some freedom for wfh wifey is worth it???
Just eat out less, go on less trips etc and there is the $2,000.00/year ???
I'm trying to see if this makes sense but the numbers don't work in my favour. I'm only saving ~$2,000/year and I am downgrading into a shoe-sized apartment. $2,000/year extra for double the space and some freedom for wfh wifey is worth it???
Just eat out less, go on less trips etc and there is the $2,000.00/year ???
Are you talking about the 2bed2bath? Cause that is anything but a shoe-sized apartment.
You should see the studios and 1beds in most of the GTA. I have closets bigger than some.
Are you talking about the 2bed2bath? Cause that is anything but a shoe-sized apartment.
You should see the studios and 1beds in most of the GTA. I have closets bigger than some.
Our last tenant before we sold rented a unit for $1625/month + hydr Lakeshore and Islington.
1+1 but we advertised it as 2 bedroom (600sqft) with 1 parking spot.
and I’m an idiot for renting out the place 2 years prior for 1250/month. **** if I was more in line with rents I would’ve been way ahead but NOOOOOOOOOOO I wanted to be ‘nice’ to my tenants. LoL
Trust me I want to and am looking into it. But 3 plex units are going for 1.5M….the rents don’t cover the mortgage.
EDIT: @george__ we had a few tenants that lived far away (Collingwood / Peterborough) and they would live in their units Monday to Friday and then back home to their families for the weekend. Difficult on the family but the time/cost of commuting made it worth it for them. Just a thought.
EDIT2: a few rooms available near UTM for 500-700/month. Your gas bill would thank you and it’d be a wash.
Trust me I want to and am looking into it. But 3 plex units are going for 1.5M….the rents don’t cover the mortgage.
EDIT: @george__ we had a few tenants that lived far away (Collingwood / Peterborough) and they would live in their units Monday to Friday and then back home to their families for the weekend. Difficult on the family but the time/cost of commuting made it worth it for them. Just a thought.
EDIT2: a few rooms available near UTM for 500-700/month. Your gas bill would thank you and it’d be a wash.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.