Well the LTB doesn’t apply in certain situations…it’s been a while since I’ve read the rules but certain units / rentals are exempt from LTB regulations IIRC.Will the LTB enforce the no drinking ???
View attachment 50432
Well the LTB doesn’t apply in certain situations…it’s been a while since I’ve read the rules but certain units / rentals are exempt from LTB regulations IIRC.Will the LTB enforce the no drinking ???
View attachment 50432
Sounds like a discrimination grievance is in order….
To what end? You don't want to start off a relationship with the landlord ****** at you. It would be helpful if the landlord got a meaningful fine (thousands) to amend their attitude but I would be shocked if that happened. Imo, spending anymore time on that property is not worthwhile.Sounds like a discrimination grievance is in order….
When I used to rent there were countless ads specifically looking for just females. If I was a single female renting a portion of my house out, I would also have some pretty specific guidelines about who I would rent to. But for self contained units like condos or full houses not sure if there is language that specifies against this. Maybe guys tend to trash places more often. I lived with 3 girls when I first moved out - made things so easy finding a house to rent.Sounds like a discrimination grievance is in order….
EDIT: I can’t believe someone would be stupid enough to put that in writing…
Well that sucks. I don't have a good answer for that one though. If the landlord can get quality candidates for hundreds more a month, why would they want to take less?Another recent story. I offered the landlord ~$150 less / month and the landlord replied back they are actually increasing the rent due to high demand and the ad is wrong
Could have also been a response to what was perceived as a low ball offer.Another recent story. I offered the landlord ~$150 less / month and the landlord replied back they are actually increasing the rent due to high demand and the ad is wrong
Maybe guys tend to trash places more often.
Maybe... but probably not on the buy a more expensive house. Expensive houses have not appreciated as much as entry levels. If you bought a 3000sq house in the north part of York Region in 2000 for $350 it would be worth $1.5M today. A $115K starter would be $700K - 3 of them $2.1M total.That's an argument for buying a more expensive house and/or improving the one you have. You made your 80K a year whether your mortgage was 500k or zero with the 500k invested elsewhere.
While you will have more gross dollars with multiple houses, as long as the primary residence tax exemption remains in place, I suspect the difference in net dollars after you liquidate all properties wouldn't be worth the hassle. In your example, you owe CG tax on 1.17M so ~300K in tax so still ahead with multiple dwellings but not as far as it looked initially. If you are talking purely investment properties then yes, more cheap dwellings will almost always blow away the return of a more expensive rental dwelling.Maybe... but probably not on the buy a more expensive house. Expensive houses have not appreciated as much as entry levels. If you bought a 3000sq house in the north part of York Region in 2000 for $350 it would be worth $1.5M today. A $115K starter would be $700K - 3 of them $2.1M total.
Another thing to consider is risk - the higher end property will suffer cataclysmic losses in a market correction, the low end ones probably nothing, may even go up as it did in the 1994 correction.
If my house was bigger than my needs, I'd sell it and buy 2 smaller rather than one bigger.
Very possible. Emailed a guy about something he was selling for $500…Could have also been a response to what was perceived as a low ball offer.
The other problem with the big house is market correction. Years ago a friend was talking to a guy that had a house valued at four million but he got downsized and went to sell. Real estate told him not to expect a million dollars. The big stuff got slammed. The average family home got hit but nowhere nearly as bad. As the high end jobs topple the guys in the four million dollar houses want to move to the blue collar neighbourhoods.Maybe... but probably not on the buy a more expensive house. Expensive houses have not appreciated as much as entry levels. If you bought a 3000sq house in the north part of York Region in 2000 for $350 it would be worth $1.5M today. A $115K starter would be $700K - 3 of them $2.1M total.
Another thing to consider is risk - the higher end property will suffer cataclysmic losses in a market correction, the low end ones probably nothing, may even go up as it did in the 1994 correction.
If my house was bigger than my needs, I'd sell it and buy 2 smaller rather than one bigger.
Well the LTB doesn’t apply in certain situations…it’s been a while since I’ve read the rules but certain units / rentals are exempt from LTB regulations IIRC.
Somethings weird about that story. The only reason you need to downsize is if your mortgage/operating/maintenance/tax is more than you can pay. Was he sitting on mortgage over 1M so he had big payments and negative equity? How did the price collapse so far? Was it crazy pricing at the beginning (eg. a neighbourhood in a frenzy as the next hot thing and that plan collapsed?). Did they find a nuclear waste dump in the back yard?The other problem with the big house is market correction. Years ago a friend was talking to a guy that had a house valued at four million but he got downsized and went to sell. Real estate told him not to expect a million dollars. The big stuff got slammed. The average family home got hit but nowhere nearly as bad. As the high end jobs topple the guys in the four million dollar houses want to move to the blue collar neighbourhoods.
I can't recall the year many decades ago but it was the time to buy a mansion if you had cash and could afford the upkeep. I bought an industrial condo for half the price a year earlier and others in the complex went for half of that.Somethings weird about that story. The only reason you need to downsize is if your mortgage/operating/maintenance/tax is more than you can pay. Was he sitting on mortgage over 1M so he had big payments and negative equity? How did the price collapse so far? Was it crazy pricing at the beginning (eg. a neighbourhood in a frenzy as the next hot thing and that plan collapsed?). Did they find a nuclear waste dump in the back yard?
Exactly. In the last few corrections the big $$$ homes got whacked, the rats fled their big houses for cheaper housing, entry level prices were forced up. In 93, the last big correction I recall, I did that, sold a house for $300 that I paid $375 to build 3 years prior. Bought a smaller place for $150 that sold for $135 the year before. Doesn't sound like big money these days, but for many a 75K loss left them owing the bank after selling.The other problem with the big house is market correction. Years ago a friend was talking to a guy that had a house valued at four million but he got downsized and went to sell. Real estate told him not to expect a million dollars. The big stuff got slammed. The average family home got hit but nowhere nearly as bad. As the high end jobs topple the guys in the four million dollar houses want to move to the blue collar neighbourhoods.