You mean your rational for you and the sheep.
The correct tin-foil-hat term is sheeple.
Just fyi.
You mean your rational for you and the sheep.
Link please . You will never see a real investigation in Canada . The main media is on the government dole.
How exactly is wearing a mask control? Of what exactly?They create fear . Yet do nothing for your safety . There are no standards for theses masks. So the people that implemented these rules know they are not for safety but control.
Which of the obtuse angles do I side with. Anybody have an acute angle on this?
I wouldn't sine in the first place.Not to go off on a tangent, but with your reasoning, I wouldn't trust you enough to cosine a loan with you.
How exactly is wearing a mask control? Of what exactly?
This was posted before. Mounting U.S. deaths reveal an outsize toll on people of colour
Re excess deaths: The above is a CP24 article (CP24 is a division of Bell Media, a private corporation, NOT on the government dole) and they are referencing US information from the CDC. Granted, the CDC is a US government organisation, but they are as non-partisan as can be.
Still think it's "fake news" invented by the government? It's consistent with similar analyses from the UK's Office for National Statistics, and from other countries.
If you think independent government agencies in different countries are all colluding to generate fake death reports (which, by the way, could be cross-checked against real people and real cases), you are beyond help.
It is a distraction from what the government is doing . Federally WE scandal and outrageous spending . While the numbers are negligible .
A mask doesn't have to filter absolutely everything out ... all it has to do is stop most of the big droplets from a sneeze or cough or talking (the big droplets carry virus in suspension) and just about any mask short of one made of fishing netting or knitting will do that (and it has been shown). Masks don't stop us from doing anything ... in fact, mandating their use allows us to go about most of our daily lives while wearing a mask most of the time.
These various infection-reduction measures don't all have to be 100% effective all the time. They just have to be effective enough so that on average, any given infected person infects less than one other person, so that the spread of infection diminishes over time.
Lots of people are being intentionally obtuse about this.
You'll have to excuse me while I go out to grab an evening coffee with a few buddies ... as I've always done ... but this time, while wearing a mask.
Dude read where the numbers are coming from " The Associated Press and The Marshall Project, a non-profit news organization covering the criminal justice system " . The article flips back a forth from CDC to these other organisations. The whole article is mixed with quotes an numbers from different places and people .
You are a great comrade . Uneducated but a great comrade . You need a specific filter to prevent the virus from escaping your mask . Go have your coffee now and fell proud you are doing your bit .
You mean your rational for you and the sheep . The numbers are almost insignificant . But you go guy show people what a good citizen you are .
ahhh...I see, you're one of those people self-elevated above epidemiologists, immunologists and virologists. Let me ask you a question...even if you don't believe what you’re being told by experts with infinitely more qualifications than yourself, what course of action do you think will get us back to normal quicker? Yours or theirs?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?They do nothing unless there is standard for them . Any cloth will do even if it does nothing . It is a distraction from what the government is doing . Federally WE scandal and outrageous spending . While the numbers are negligible .
You are a great comrade . Uneducated but a great comrade . You need a specific filter to prevent the virus from escaping your mask . Go have your coffee now and fell proud you are doing your bit .