Pic.
Lastly, a correction you are not a "witness" a witness is someone who actually viewed the incident. You provided a "background statement".
Please feel free to forward YOUR correction to the SIU as their media release stated "Four witness officers and seven civilian witnesses were interviewed."
Eleven people were not standing on the side of the highway that night.
Funny how the same accident just happened up the road and what do you know the driver is being charged
The driver of the Camry faces a maximum sentence of six months in jail.
The 21-year-old driver was also charged with start from stop, not with safety.
21 year-old Georgina woman has been charged with careless driving
God damn if the situation was reversed , it would be different.
the cop got a get out of jail free card for carelessly ending someone's life. While the driver in this situation , gets charged and jailed.
Was the motorcyclist in this crash doing 160kph? If so, then you have a point....
What if he was doing 130 kph?
So apart from simply the sort of incident, are there any other similarities? This second incident occurred in the afternoon, not late at night, so presumably visibility wasn't an issue. Speed was not stated to be an issue. Presumably the construction isn't the same as it was at the time. What was the weather like?
please feel free to forward your correction to the siu as their media release stated "four witness officers and seven civilian witnesses were interviewed."
eleven people were not standing on the side of the highway that night.
The bike is 100 times easier to see and hear at night. Going the speed it was would make it easier to hear, and the cop was at idle before turning into him. You ever not hear a bike ripping while your sitting at idle? Nope.
rob, you hate to admit your wrong, you will completely beat this thread to death before admitting your wrong.
If this was one of your loved ones you would be on here defending the cop? Lol of corse not. We all know there is too many politics involved in convicting the officer, it would presumably snowball into a lot of other cases being reopened, news reports (because media loves that crap) and the whole department looking like unthoughtfull poorly trained cops.
Which in my opinion is why it was ruled the way it was. It's a corrupt selfish sad world we live in
I wouldn't use "simply the sort of incident" as a reference to the similarity. It was a car making a Uturn in front of a motorcycle. The movements of the vehicles are very similar.
We can talk about visibility and conditions all we like, but the way I see it, all the conditions that would have made the Uturn difficult to perform safely show that the officer was acting unreasonably.
The bike is 100 times easier to see and hear at night. Going the speed it was would make it easier to hear, and the cop was at idle before turning into him. You ever not hear a bike ripping while your sitting at idle? Nope.
rob, you hate to admit your wrong, you will completely beat this thread to death before admitting your wrong.
If this was one of your loved ones you would be on here defending the cop? Lol of corse not. We all know there is too many politics involved in convicting the officer, it would presumably snowball into a lot of other cases being reopened, news reports (because media loves that crap) and the whole department looking like unthoughtfull poorly trained cops.
Which in my opinion is why it was ruled the way it was. It's a corrupt selfish sad world we live in