I'm not surprised. It's easier to bang a drum and complain than it is to ensure the business is viable.I think that was an offer made about 20 years ago. Union said no thanks.
I'm not surprised. It's easier to bang a drum and complain than it is to ensure the business is viable.I think that was an offer made about 20 years ago. Union said no thanks.
We've had those boxes in Alliston for 30 plus years. I don't understand what the big deal is. Seriously, unless someone needs something to whine about.Then there will be a huge revolt by the people not wanting superboxes…
They will definitely reduce labour costs in the long run, but initially, it would be a very very hefty investment. If CP is as bad off as they say, then this can’t be accomplished due to the amount of capital expenditure necessary.
And the sun still shines.They are all over Georgetown,
That’s the thing.We've had those boxes in Alliston for 30 plus years. I don't understand what the big deal is. Seriously, unless someone needs something to whine about.
As this point, I don't really care what whiney people want. The system is broken. I would say start charging $100/yr for door delivery but that won't work as a few would take the offer and a postie would still have to walk the route. Maybe the number needs to be more like $1000/yr to get almost everyone into superboxes.Superboxes make mail delivery much easier for sure. But people like the luxury of door to door. CP is in a hard place here.
At least CP would have a plan going forward and be able to justify a government bailout to the taxpayers. Maybe they should defund the CBC to cover the initial cost to change everyone over to super boxes.Initially, it would cost them millions upon millions of dollars.
The superboxes are not cheap. They are installed by contractors. They need to get city approval for locations of the boxes.
Then they need to buy a sh1t ton of delivery vehicles.
Need to restructure all of the routes, which takes several months to accomplish.
Then there will be a huge revolt by the people not wanting superboxes…
They will definitely reduce labour costs in the long run, but initially, it would be a very very hefty investment. If CP is as bad off as they say, then this can’t be accomplished due to the amount of capital expenditure necessary.
While planned boxes are normally within a few hundred feet of their houses, I expect retrofit boxes may be slightly further. For instance, put 15 or 20 superboxes in a neighbourhood park to service the area. That has minimal use when the posties need access and normally some accommodation for vehicles stopping/parking.I don't even know where a superbox would go in my area, we have no sidewalks here, very little boulevards.
Plus even though I want CP re-structured I do like my door delivery.... too much??
I think you have to go back to 2011 to see the beginning of the end. Before that, CPC had something north of 65% of the package business in Canada, and 90% of the packages delivered to residential destinations. They were making money. In the last 5 years, they have lost more than 1/2 their package delivery market share in Canada - most of that in the highest profit routes.Oh clearly they are miss managed. There doesn't seem to be a viable long term strategy. They've been doing this longer then anyone else, but didn't see the rise of Amazon, and all other kinds of disruptions to lettermail and packages. Seems they want to keep the status Quo and hold onto the position of where they have priority access over make changes.
Yeah the union doesn't do itself any favours here, similar to why the TTC is the way it is and makes it harder to get better service because the union can't see the forest for the trees kinda senerio.
IF they can't get a deal in place before the end of the year, that would be shameful.
Years ago when a buddy bought his first house I waited until he left for work during his 2nd week of ownership and printed up some official looking Municipality of Durham letterhead with a notice that they would be installing a bus shelter in front of his house and posted it on his door for him to come home to. I also spray-painted a big rectangle on his lawn by the curb. Hook line and sinker (he even called the municipal office to complain).Super boxes are all fine and dandy until they put it on your front or side yard... When that happens to you I imagine everyone becomes a whiner.
The superbox would be everywhere already , except CP messed it up completely about fifteen years ago . They started just placing concrete pads and boxes where CP engineers said that would be best . Towns said , wait a minute you idiots , we have bylaws on set backs and installs and your parking your box with no install permits, and no application. One town does it and they all follow, so the super box goes into new areas , but refitting went on hold in most neighborhoods.
Warren Buffet bought a company in the midwest as it was about to go belly up. He saw that it had too many employees and a massive inventory of parts worth only scrap metal prices. He cut staff 25% IRC and inventory purchase were cut back until things balanced out.As a start, this constant battle for living wages and raises to match inflation is a fools game. While laudible goals, if there isn't enough money to accomplish the goals, you just speed the path to bankruptcy and entire workforce unemployed. Sadly, it you want to make more money sometimes that involves changing employers and/or jobs. Where it gets a little murky is maybe CP has enough money to pay CUPW ask but blows it on stupid stuff which is entirely plausible. But still, that is reality. CP loses money fast with no clear path to fixing the economics of their business. Paying employees more doesn't do anything to fix that fundamental issue.
Part of me wonders if unions should buy an ownership stake in businesses. Sure, that is a slight conflict but on the flipside, if their employee demands bankrupt the business the union investment is wiped out. That would help to balance requests vs reality. Right now they can complain about the boogieman and needs for more money and have zero concern about how the business funds the wishlist. If the business dies the union loses income but no capital. Normally they are light on employees and heavy on compensation so bonuses for union leaders would be down a bit but otherwise business as usual. Employees are unwitting pawns in the game. Propped up by ra-ra unions and echo chamber discussions about how bad they have it and how much more they deserve. The last sentence is not specifically directed at CUPW, ime that is a relatively common scenario and especially prevalent in public sector unions that believe the purse in infinite.
I suspect CP has much higher costs than the competition. On the plus side CP doesn't extort us with ridiculous brokerage fees. That would be an easy one for them to add to increase revenue.I don't understand how CP is losing money on their deliveries. Whenever I have the option to receive a package from the US for example. I always chose USPS to Canada Post vs UPS. The package arrives just as quick, good service and I don't get scammed for the duty fees that UPS charges. Maybe alot of people don't know about CP as a delivery option?
I found them reliable and quick. Maybe they should promote this service more?
CP is mandated to deliver to every address. Not all those addresses are cost effective;I don't understand how CP is losing money on their deliveries. Whenever I have the option to receive a package from the US for example. I always chose USPS to Canada Post vs UPS. The package arrives just as quick, good service and I don't get scammed for the duty fees that UPS charges. Maybe alot of people don't know about CP as a delivery option?
I found them reliable and quick. Maybe they should promote this service more?
That is an interesting point. The mandate doesn't appear to have a timeline enshrined but does require that revenue is sufficient to cover costs. While most of our discussions have been around urban areas and issues with mail volume, maybe there can be progress on rural areas first. Waste less time driving by sending a postie out on their long route less often.CP is mandated to deliver to every address. Not all those addresses are cost effective;
Paying someone $31/hr + benefits to drive his truck 1-2hrs in rural canada to drop off 1 or 2 boxes then come back, etc.
F9 uses CP, and it's pretty quick.I don't understand how CP is losing money on their deliveries. Whenever I have the option to receive a package from the US for example. I always chose USPS to Canada Post vs UPS. The package arrives just as quick, good service and I don't get scammed for the duty fees that UPS charges. Maybe alot of people don't know about CP as a delivery option?
I found them reliable and quick. Maybe they should promote this service more?