Canada is ******

Citation?

I think we may be surprised at how some other countries view Canada vs the USA and may "conveniently" ship us more than they might otherwise have early on. Trump for example didn't make any friends at Pfizer when he rushed to the microphone and twitter to take full credit for a vaccine produced by a company that didn't take a dollar of government money to research and produce.

One thing I will say about JT (although I'm not a big fan and didn't vote for him, as I've said before) is that they do have some master communicators in the government and have in the last few years managed to get results that have benefited Canada against all odds. Against what seemed like impossible odds quite often, actually.
money talks and we have no idea what the contracts say. under the circumstances i imagine there are some very explicit due dates and quantities spelled out when it hits mass production.
 
I dont have a saved link to this stinker. JT and CF have said multiple times that they gave money to drug companies to ensure canada got something. Part of the negotiation was the companies can keep the money even if the vaccine failed or was released too late to matter.
lol
 
As MP stated, it's not that the vaccine development has been rushed, it's all the other bureaucratic bumbling has been removed for this effort and the reasons for that should be very clear. Have not heard one medical expert disagree with this analysis yet.
For those who want to stand at the back of the line to see what happens to others getting the vaccine ..... thank you! I'll gladly step in front of you. What I wonder about most is the triage process and who will handle that. Hopefully not the government! I expect there will suddenly be a rush of people with "pre-existing medical conditions". What will people be required to show to prove their claims? Age is a no brainer but other medical claims?
 
I expect there will suddenly be a rush of people with "pre-existing medical conditions". What will people be required to show to prove their claims? Age is a no brainer but other medical claims?
This, they have not opened there mouths about this part of the vaccine and if they even are going to give the vaccine to pre-existing people
 
For those who want to stand at the back of the line to see what happens to others getting the vaccine ..... thank you! I'll gladly step in front of you.

You're very welcome.

Like I said, I'm not an anti-vaxxer. I'll definitely recommend to my parents who are in their 80s to get the vaccine.

But I'm in a low-risk group so I'm happy to let others ahead of me, if they need it. I will also take it when it is my turn so we can achieve the numbers needed for herd immunity.

Not afraid it will give me autism or anything, but I'm concerned about the effectiveness. I don't want to have to take another vaccine 6 months after because this one did not take.
 
@PrivatePilot @Evoex Some citations.

"Full payments to drug companies are contingent on the vaccines passing clinical trials and obtaining regulatory approval. All contracts the Government of Canada signs with vaccine developers contain off-ramps and exit provisions, should they be required."

"In all, Canada has committed $1 billion to buy at least 154 million doses of vaccines from five different companies, and most of that money will not be refunded even if the vaccines never get approved."
 

Canada is ******? You are trying too hard to create a popular thread.Nothing to see here.Canada is just fine.Stay safe everyone.​


Well it seems pretty popular right now. But yeah, I'm not worried. Then again I never was. The best thing about other countries getting it first is that if it makes them mutate into zombies, we'll avoid the apocalypse. I just know Justin Trudeau thought of that - that's why he wisely put us at the back of the line. He's so smart.
 
"In all, Canada has committed $1 billion to buy at least 154 million doses of vaccines from five different companies, and most of that money will not be refunded even if the vaccines never get approved."

For the record, I believe you’ll find contracts between vaccine companies and pretty much all countries that signed them have the same clauses.

If successful, awesome, give us the shots. If not, well, you couldn’t have even tried without the funding.

ROI on what amounts to research funding with a likely positive outcome is turning out to be very high at this point.

There’s no mention (given admittedly cursory glance) of delivery timeline commitments however, so that’s up in their air and likely open to change at this point.
 
You're very welcome.

Like I said, I'm not an anti-vaxxer. I'll definitely recommend to my parents who are in their 80s to get the vaccine.

But I'm in a low-risk group so I'm happy to let others ahead of me, if they need it. I will also take it when it is my turn so we can achieve the numbers needed for herd immunity.

Not afraid it will give me autism or anything, but I'm concerned about the effectiveness. I don't want to have to take another vaccine 6 months after because this one did not take.
I fully respect your right to choose and to evaluate your own risk factors. The fact that some will get vaccine early on will help those who don't so it's actually a win for all no matter which camp you're in. The key ingredient here is to get the vaccine and get it into Canadian arms asap! I have no doubt that the vaccines in question at the moment will be effective, based on early reports.
 
For low risk joe-schmoe.

High risk and medium/moderate, Q1.

The next battle is getting people to actually *take* it. Considering all the antivax whackos out there as well as those who automatically fear it because they don't understand it wasn't "rushed" (just properly funded, see my reply above) and assume accordingly that they're guinea pigs, that's going to be the bigger challenge I suspect.
I need a reference for that statement. As far as I know it's made up. No one's leaked any early dates for here, except for possibly Ford, but he also said over a million doses, and one station actually had the nerve to put Kathleen Wynne on to criticize him. Elliot said "expect to see four million doses between January and March. Two million for Moderna." That's not a firm date, and it's basically Q2. We'll be updated closer to then that it's delayed, etc. etc. If not, I'll apologize then if you remind me.

Canada is ******? You are trying too hard to create a popular thread.Nothing to see here.Canada is just fine.Stay safe everyone.​

Why would I try that? Do I get internet points or something? Are they spendable? We've got pretty much the same dog's breakfast going as the U.S., Both Justin and Doug have made some fumbles, anti maskers and anti shutdown people are protesting, people are losing jobs, billions being wasted . . . We just don't have an Operation Warp Speed.

Edit: btw Nice to see you back. Missed you.
Stay home everyone. As much as you can.
 
Last edited:
I was hoping we could be a little faster:
R3faWgHh.png


Mortality Analyses - Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center

Edit: US is way down the list at 2.0%.
Full U.S. numbers are 12,883,264; 263,454; 2.0%; 80.53
 
you've sorted that table by Case-Fatality rate

explain to me how a Warp Speed vaccine plan is going to improve Canada's ranking on that?

is it going to make Canadians healthier?
 
you've sorted that table by Case-Fatality rate

explain to me how a Warp Speed vaccine plan is going to improve Canada's ranking on that?

is it going to make Canadians healthier?
Ask anyone who loses a loved one to COVID in the next nine months.

Once the vaccine is given to everyone who needs it, the case-fatality rate starts falling precipitously after a couple of weeks, hopefully to zero or near zero.

Warp speed would hasten that process.


Edit: @PrivatePilot Still haven't seen your reference for dates yet.
 
Can't the Star even be bothered to run a spelling checker on the article, or identify their sources?
". . . Canada has not even negotiated to right to manufacture doses of them here at home . . ."
"A member of Canada’s Vaccine Task Force — the group tasked with advising the government on locking down doses for Canadians — says . . ."
Does that mean that all members agree with what was said, since it's a generic member? That's kind of like saying "scientists say . . .".

Worst part is that they didn't answer all of the question posed in the headline.
 
Ask anyone who loses a loved one to COVID in the next nine months.

Once the vaccine is given to everyone who needs it, the case-fatality rate starts falling precipitously after a couple of weeks, hopefully to zero or near zero.

Warp speed would hasten that process.


Edit: @PrivatePilot Still haven't seen your reference for dates yet.
if we could vaccinate every Canadian tomorrow
no more new infections
the case fatality rate stays the same, forever

you chose to sort the data that way as it suits your narrative
puts Canada in a poor light that suits your politics
 
if we could vaccinate every Canadian tomorrow
no more new infections
the case fatality rate stays the same, forever

you chose to sort the data that way as it suits your narrative
puts Canada in a poor light that suits your politics
You are correct about the first part. The cases go to zero, not necessarily the rate unless we get better at treating it.

The second part I learned from you. It doesn't rely on my politics, but my empathy for others, and hindsight.
 
Not an anti-vaxxer by any stretch of the imagination, but I'm in no rush to take this vaccine that's been rushed to market (relative to the extensive testing that other vaccines go through).

If they're saying vulnerable members of society and front-line health care workers get first access, than I'm happy to step back and wait.

Clarification: I will get vaccinated, but won't be first in line.
My wife has adamantly said the same...

Sent from my SM-A530W using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top Bottom