That's expensive for society (and the kids). All the kids lose a year at their highest ever salary if that happens.I heard that some of the states in the US are actually thinking of making next year a repeat year for all students mandatory...IIRC it was TN but not 100% sure...in some ways I agree with it, in that combine last year's shutdown and this year's up and down roller coaster, a lot of kids would benefit from repeating the material they learned/should've learned this year...tough call for sure...
but yeah, the unions don't like it...
It would be an interesting poll but it would never be done (and if by some miracle it was done, it would never see light) if you asked the teachers if the investments the OTPP made should be in companies that offer benefits and compensation schemes similar to the teachers in the union (not absolute dollars but livable wage, pension for employees, months of vacation for all, etc). Yes or no. If you pick yes, your pension income is reduced as the investments are less profitable (my guess is 50% or more reduction). Do ethics really matter the most or really it's money that trumps and virtue signalling where possible?Whats an Ontario teachers definition of unfair working conditions? Having to work after 4pm or during a "holiday"?
They think money comes from a money tree.
Ethics dont matter. The virtue signallers, SJWs etc just pretend they do.Do ethics really matter the most or really it's money that trumps and virtue signalling where possible?
is this any different from anyone? I don't understand the problem.....everyone is allowed to be hypocritical all the time. Everyone has investments. most don't give 2 ***** how those investments make money.It would be an interesting poll but it would never be done (and if by some miracle it was done, it would never see light) if you asked the teachers if the investments the OTPP made should be in companies that offer benefits and compensation schemes similar to the teachers in the union (not absolute dollars but livable wage, pension for employees, months of vacation for all, etc). Yes or no. If you pick yes, your pension income is reduced as the investments are less profitable (my guess is 50% or more reduction). Do ethics really matter the most or really it's money that trumps and virtue signalling where possible?
I don't have an organized group running PR bitching about my investments moral stance. I choose to avoid what I consider evil companies regardless of the returns they give (Robellus, Enercare, etc) but I have no problem if others choose to invest in them. If this organized group was able to enact change and push Wine Rack closer to an employee focussed business, I would have no doubt that they would ***** about returns being below expectations. Just ***** ***** ***** publicly. Useless wankers.is this any different from anyone? I don't understand the problem.....everyone is allowed to be hypocritical all the time. Everyone has investments. most don't give 2 ***** how those investments make money.
To some extent I care about the environment but I could never call myself an environmentalist as I like things that are not exactly good for the environment.is this any different from anyone? I don't understand the problem.....everyone is allowed to be hypocritical all the time. Everyone has investments. most don't give 2 ***** how those investments make money.
And the group bitching is neither of those. They are all beholden to the same stakeholders though. We get who we deserve (because it will come up again, there are some really hard working dedicated teachers that I love, I believe they are in the minority and sliding fast to be replaced by the wankers).Sorry but Teacher's Unions ≠ Teacher's Pension Plan
Do people actually think they are run by the same people????
She’s not a phony….she’s a savvy investor.Then we find out she bought several investment properties in predominately white areas. Typical virtue signalling phony.
Sponsoring pride is an interesting topic on its own. I considered it and reached out to a few people that are well connected and ultimately decided not to. Their take was pride is the big party that brands like to attach to for the recognition but if you want to make a difference, you are far better donating to different organizations with little recognition but positive impact punching above their weight.I can find an article but there was an X number of companies that push the Pride narrative, while backing anti-Pride groups. It’s all show.
She likely doesnt know jack **** about investing. Anyone can prop down money for an investment property, doesnt make her savvy at all.She’s not a phony….she’s a savvy investor.
She realizes, like you and others say, financial investments are rarely reflected in peoples values. Unless it’s making money…then they match.
I can find an article but there was an X number of companies that push the Pride narrative, while backing anti-Pride groups. It’s all show.
Sorry I meant ‘savvy’ similar to people buying houses and the value goes up. But they’re poor little guys when the value goes down.She likely doesnt know jack **** about investing. Anyone can prop down money for an investment property, doesnt make her savvy at all.
Shes the very definition of a phony. I cant think of anyone who is more of a phony than her.
Lewis Hamilton etc telling the world it needs to stop pollution, meanwhile the three of them have the carbon footprint of a small city.