redridernl
Well-known member
if they want to go after anyone, they want the people that are hosting/sourcing the stuff. Which I think is foolish.
Netflix has shown that people are willing to pay for a product that delivers their needs. $200/mth for 65 channels of crap doesn't meet peoples viewing needs. Technology and viewership is adapting faster than distribution companies and tv/film studios.
Heck, most shows you can watch free of charge right on the website of your local station (with commercials of course).
It's a matter of time until artificial, geoblocking, blackout rules are revised and everyone has access to everything, for a fair price. Until that happens, these alternatives (just like FTA boxes, Satellites, reprogrammed cable boxes, etc before them) are what folks will use.
I'm with you. I'm just saying that if they wanted to crack down like with torrents, they could. When you watch something on the ctv website for instance, they get paid due to advertising revenue. In that case you have the permission of the commercial rights holder. When you get it from another source, that permission is not given.