This is tricky territory. I'm not a religious person, but I've always been interested in how religion interplays with politics.I understand it, but I don’t agree with decisions made on religious principles. I don’t think religion has any part to play in the daily running of people’s lives from a legal perspective. I liken it to a hobby, it’s yours to pursue how you wish in the confines of the law but don’t let it bleed into other people’s lives.
For first trimester, it's reasonable to expect near 100% be dobe using oral medication. I think some countries are already there, Sweden comes to mind.A fraction of 1% of abortions are as you detailed. 93% are first trimester and 44% of those abortions are now chemical. The Supreme Court could have left things as they were. As it is, my feeling is that the availability of chemical abortions will now increase through whatever means is available (unmarked US post mail etc).
What happens if religion and philosophy is blanked out and all we have left is scientific cold hard facts?
A car is made of metal, metal begins as a rock. So a car is a rock. Right?A human being begins at conception
You have abortion laws that respect the rights of women to decide what happens to their own bodies, laws that respect the sanctity of "SELF". Sorta the definition of FREEDOM, the FREEDOM that americans keep shouting about, waving flags about... but DON'T HAVE.What happens if religion and philosophy is blanked out and all we have left is scientific cold hard facts?
But open carry of pistol or ownership of an AR-15 assault rifle is okay.You have abortion laws that respect the rights of women to decide what happens to their own bodies, laws that respect the sanctity of "SELF". Sorta the definition of FREEDOM, the FREEDOM that americans keep shouting about, waving flags about... but DON'T HAVE.
What's the next FREEDOM to go? Contraception? Gay rights? (today being PRIDE day), conscription?
Slippery slope? In one fell swoop these asshats got to the bottom of the hill.
It could have been VERY simple for Scotus to rule on Roe v Wade, but give the states time to work out ruling on this VERY important decision. They had Roe v Wade for 50yrs, one more ain't gonna hurt... and no one could get a Scotus challenge in a year.As for leaving things as they were, that would not be possible given their ruling. Scotus is the final stop in challenging US laws, it would be a travesty of justice if Scotus drew a conclusion that a law was wrong then buried the decision because correcting it meant a lot of work.
err NOSlavery once was okay, but now it isn't.
NOT affect. NOT affect.Woooosh.
They literally wrote it that way to get around the constitution. And the right wing Judges ate it up. Imagine a law that says that anyone who sells a gun that is then used in a crime can be sued by any individual in the state? what will the judges say then?The laws you think you're talking about are civil... and it's private citizens suing private citizens, not involving the state.
Texas can't prosecute someone for something they did in another state.
Interstate travel is a constitutionally protected right...
How does the minority get what they want.....through denying Democratic Judges/placing judges who lie to get on the SCOTUS. Saved you a lot of typing for next time.Finally, how does a minority get what they want? That's a little more complex. Scotus' decision was the 14th amendment did not guarantee a right of choice, that R v W decision erred interpreting due process and right to privacy. Scotus ruled it did not expressly confer a right to choose, which under US law makes it matter for each state to legislate by elected officials. Now it's complicated - each state now makes the rules - states full of conservatives go one way, liberals the other. I'm guessing within each state, the majority will prevail - which is exactly the way the US Constitution says it should work.
How does the minority get what they want.....through denying Democratic Judges/placing judges who lie to get on the SCOTUS. Saved you a lot of typing for next time.
Minor correction, Scotus judges are nominated by Potus, confirmed by the senate.SCOTUS Judges are nominated by the ruling party that was elected by the people at the time a sitting judge retires/dies... it amazes me how anytime something doesn't go the lefts way they want to cancel it and call it unfair/racist/misogynist...
The democrats could have made an amendment and solidified abortion rights and gay marriage rights at any point when they were in power over the last 50 years, but they didn't. They instead used the issues as political tools to fear monger people each election with the exact scenario that's happening now, just to get them to go out and vote for them.
Do you even know who Merrick Garland is? Pull your head out of the sand. Do you know what a filibuster is? do you understand how an amendment to the constitution occurs? Please do not answer that. We all know the answer.SCOTUS Judges are nominated by the ruling party that was elected by the people at the time a sitting judge retires/dies... it amazes me how anytime something doesn't go the lefts way they want to cancel it and call it unfair/racist/misogynist...
The democrats could have made an amendment and solidified abortion rights and gay marriage rights at any point when they were in power over the last 50 years, but they didn't. They instead used the issues as political tools to fear monger people each election with the exact scenario that's happening now, just to get them to go out and vote for them.
Do you even know who Merrick Garland is? Pull your head out of the sand. Do you know what a filibuster is? do you understand how an amendment to the constitution occurs? Please do not answer that. We all know the answer.
HUH??? Sauce?Trudeau has even offered to perform abortions for Americans on our tax dime...
IF you can afford to travel to a state where abortions are available... and put your self up in that state for a couple of days if you get a surgical abortion... and PAY for the procedure because being from out of state and being a NON resident you don't qualify for any financial or medical assistanceAt the end of the day they will still be avaliable if someone wants one.
Ivana Trump had no problem getting an abortion.