I don't have an issue with the backgrounds of the athletes, monied or not. They're doing what they love at an incredible level for little to no monetary return. Naturally that's going to lend itself to people whose backgrounds permit that. I watched highlights of archer Eric Peters from Kitchener in a shoot-off tie break in an early round, and they were having so much fun and enjoying the moment. Every four years, these athletes get people appreciating the thing they dedicate their lives to, and as surreal as that is, it's also pretty powerful.
The problem I do have is with the IOC and the various national sports federations, most of whom are as corrupt as they come, and have built a huge industry of grift on the backs of the above amateur athletes. I also have a problem with the cost of the games being borne by citizens of the cities where they're held, often at huge financial loss.
As for the trans thing, while I'm theoretically opposed in terms of the thought experiment, I'm going to reserve my manufactured outrage for when it actually becomes an issue...
I read an essay yesterday about luge athletes in the US. The premise was that there are some of the more obscure sports in some countries that allow the wealthy to compete at a high level. These are most likely not the best at their sport, just the best at their sport that can afford to participate. Granted, the issue is much much bigger for the Winter Olympics than for the summer Olympics.
I like the better/stronger/faster element of the Olympics and the breathtaking skill involved (I watched a clip of that archery). I have zero interest in watching rich wankers get their jollies off though. One of the issues with British tennis for example is that the barrier to participating in the sport is a huge class system that exists for players at the club level. The result? Youngsters get turned off and do something else and thus we are pretty crap at the game on a global level.
As for the horse sports, unless the horse actually gets the medal and is on the podium the whole thing is just daft. Trinny the inbred debutante from Cheltenham Ladies College with a IQ of 6 was just the passenger.
Now rant time…I don’t know why certain sports found their way from the X Games to the Olympics. I think the two were a good complement to each other. I don’t want to watch some 13 year old on a BMX bike do a trick with a name I’ll instantly forget or a pothead from Colorado do something weird on a snowboard.
Also while we are on a controversial topic…since everyone’s talking about genetics. Can we discuss why we even have basketball as a sport since it’s really only dominated by genetic mutants and, for the US in particular, seems to make a mockery of the Olympic ideal in terms of who participates.
I’d like to thank a very nice half bottle of Cabernet Sauvignon for the above screed.
Burp.
Last edited: