2012 gsxr 1000 | GTAMotorcycle.com

2012 gsxr 1000

gideel

Well-known member
From: http://www.asphaltandrubber.com/bikes/2012-suzuki-gsxr1000/

2012-suzuki-gsxr-1000-25.jpg



Surely not the update that Gixxer lovers were hoping for, the 2012 Suzuki GSX-R1000 sees a modest retooling as the Japanese company’s liter bike most noticeably goes back to a single exhaust can design. Officially dropping 2kg (4.4 lbs) from its curb weight, we assume the weight savings to the new Suzuki GSX-R1000 can be accounted purely from the new exhaust layout, though Suzuki lists a number of small weight savings throughout the Gixxer’s refined design. Despite a bevy of minor improvements, the big changes include the addition of a beefier midrange, better throttle response, Brembo monoblock calipers with .5mm thinner brake discs, and an improved fuel efficiency by 8%. Photos after the jump.


Evolving the GSXR-1000′s motor further, Suzuki has lightened Gixxer’s pistons by 11%, while maintaing their strength and durability. The piston-pin bosses are narrower, while the piston skirts are shape-optimized, with asymmetry between the intake and exhaust sides. Additionally, the pistons’ valve recesses are smoother for better combustion efficiency, which creates more torque and better acceleration at low and mid-range engine speeds, as well as better throttle response, and lower fuel consumption.


Other changes in the four-cylinder motor’s design include pentagonal ventilation holes, which help lighten the motor and have lower pumping losses and accordingly better combustion efficiency. Suzuki has also been able to revise the exhaust cam profile for a slight reduction in valve overlap, and has increased the compression ratio to 12.9:1 (up from 12.8:1). The 2012 Suzuki GSXR-1000′s ECU has also been re-mapped to account for the 4-2-1 exhaust system and other engine refinements.


2012-suzuki-gsxr-1000-27.jpg


What a huge disappointment. 4.4lbs? That's probably less than what the other side of the 2010 exhaust weigh. Improved fuel efficiency? That's the last thing a literbike buyer would be looking for. The styling looks way outdated (the blue and white fairing stickers looks outright hideous) and is still porky compared to the newer competition.

No TC, and more importantly ABS. Time to scratch out Suzuki from my 2012 literbike shopping list :D
 
Its a GSXR son, if you need abs and tc then go drive a car. whats next? u want an automatic transmission too?
 
Its a GSXR son, if you need abs and tc then go drive a car. whats next? u want an automatic transmission too?

why doesn't your bike have a kick start? real men ride bikes with it. if you want electric start then go drive a car.
 
You know, there's nothing wrong with it. It's still a stupid fast bike and it can be raced at the highest levels if you put some work into it.

But..... dammit, what is Suzuki trying to do, re-invent the ZX-9R?
 
Improved fuel efficiency? That's the last thing a literbike buyer would be looking for.
What they really meant was "better emissions". Look at how they murdered the R6 just for emissions :(

-Jamie M.
 
Well after Suzuki stated "No new GSXR1000 for 2011 but the 2012 will be amazing" I had high expectations. I agree the bike was already very good but I had hopes it would get slimmer and lighter, some updated styling, and some more ponies up top and especially in the midrange. I don't feel those expectations were too high and unfortunately it looks like they haven't been met. Looks like I'll be keeping my '06 for another year (nothing against my '06 of course as it's a stud).
 
You know, there's nothing wrong with it. It's still a stupid fast bike and it can be raced at the highest levels if you put some work into it.

But..... dammit, what is Suzuki trying to do, re-invent the ZX-9R?

Of course theres nothing wrong with the 2012 GSXR 1000. Any literbike is already stupid fast enough and more bike than 99.999999% any human can handle unless you are stoner or rossi.

But the problem is, when you go shop for something (at least for me) you look at what the competition offers and make a decision based on that. Now, why would I buy a bike that lacks the "bells and whistles" of ABS/traction control when there are other brands that offer it? Will I even ride the bike to the limit where TC will engage on the street? Probably not, but it might save my *** one day. ABS on the other-hand would've more than likely save my butt on a number of occasions or made close-calls not as close.

When you compare them side-by-side, the package that the GSXR brings is a lot weaker than the BMW, Aprila, Honda, kawai, and duc (tba) IMO. The only advantage the GSXR might have is pricing.
 
The GSXR is boring. It essentially looks the same as it has since 2005. They're in need of a ground-up redesign.
 
Can't tell the difference between this generation and the last several generations.
 
If you build it, squds will buy it. It still sells so why change it, it's a gixxer yo!
 
why doesn't your bike have a kick start? real men ride bikes with it. if you want electric start then go drive a car.

my bike does have kick start cause im a real men...seems that this hobby has been infiltrated with feminine males
 
I like it. Should have taken it to the next level but it's a nasty economy to recover that type of expense. Perhaps 2014?
 
still a good poser bike
 
Was hoping for some extra HP to put the BMW behind. Suzuki has always had great and fast motors, so I don't know why they didn't add a few more HP's. Like Shaman said though, bike is still stupid fast, and the added exhausts on it for lighter weight is pretty much a waste since those will be modded off.
 
At least it is back to a single can, instead of those two god-awful organic-looking curved contraptions.
 

Back
Top Bottom